Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Double-Blind Comparative Study of JNS013 in Patients With Post-Tooth-Extraction Pain
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JNS013 with single oral dose administration in participants with pain after tooth-extraction of mandibular impacted wisdom tooth.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 328 |
| Est. completion date | September 2008 |
| Est. primary completion date | September 2008 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 20 Years to 74 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Participants planned to receive a tooth extraction of one mandibular impacted wisdom tooth - Participants who require bone removal and separation of the crown at tooth extraction - Participants whose intensity of pain associated with tooth extraction within 2 hours after tooth extraction is greater than or equal to 50.0 millimeter on the visual analog scale (VAS) - Participants who did not undergo general anesthesia or sedation at tooth extraction - Participants without an abnormality (including laboratory test values) corresponding to Grade 3 in the "Criteria for severity classification of adverse drug reactions" during the pretreatment observation period Exclusion Criteria: - Participants with conditions for which tramadol is contraindicated - Participants with conditions for which acetaminophen is contraindicated - Participants with history of convulsions or the possibility of convulsive seizures - Pregnant participants or those who may be pregnant, lactating mothers, and those who wish pregnancy during the study period - Participants with concurrent, previous, or possible alcohol dependence, drug dependence or narcotic addiction |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. |
Japan,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Total Pain Relief Based on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score | Total pain relief was evaluated using numerical rating scale score ranging from 0 to 32, wherein 0 indicates no treatment response and 32 indicates the most improved. Higher score indicates treatment response. | 8 hours | No |
| Secondary | Total Pain Relief Based on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score Every 4 Hours up to 8 Hours | Total pain relief was evaluated using numerical rating scale score ranging from 0 to 32, wherein 0 indicates no treatment response and 32 indicates the most improved. Higher score indicates treatment response. | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) | Pain Intensity (PI) was assessed using numerical rating scale score ranging from 0 to 32, wherein 0 indicates no treatment response and 32 indicates the most improved. Scores were measured at Baseline (that is, 0 hours after tooth extraction) and 8 hours post-administration of study treatments.Pain intensity difference (PID) was calculated (that is, for 0-8 hours, time point [8 hour] score minus baseline [0 hour] score). | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Sum of Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (SPRID) | The SPRID is the sum of pain relief scores combined with pain intensity difference, score ranging from from (-) 24 (the worst) through 56 (the most improved). Higher score indicates treatment response. Pain Intensity (PI) and Pain relief (PAR) were assessed using numerical rating scale score ranging from 0 to 32, wherein 0 indicates no treatment response and 32 indicates the most improved. Scores were measured at Baseline (that is, 0 hours after tooth extraction) and at 8 hours post-administration of study treatments. Pain intensity difference (PID) was calculated (that is, for 0-8 hours, time point [8 hour] score minus baseline [0 hour] score). | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Hours Post-administration of Study Treatment | Pain was assessed by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 millimeter (mm)=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain. An increase in score from Baseline represented disease progression and decrease represented treatment response. | 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean Change Over Time for Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Hours Post-Administration of Study Treatment | The PID is defined as difference between current pain intensity (PI) and Baseline PI, PI was assessed using numerical rating scale score ranging from 0 to 32, wherein 0 indicates no treatment response and 32 indicates the most improved. Higher score indicates treatment response. Mean change from Baseline (that is, 0 hours after tooth extraction) at specified end time points were evaluated. | 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean Change Over Time for Pain Relief (PAR) at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Hours Post-administration of Study Treatment | Pain Relief (PAR) was assessed using numerical rating scale score ranging from 0 to 32, wherein 0 indicates no treatment response and 32 indicates the most improved. Higher score indicates treatment response. Mean change from Baseline (that is, 0 hours after tooth extraction) at specified end time points were evaluated. | 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Mean Change Over Time for Pain Relief Combined With Pain Intensity Difference (PRID) at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Hours Post-administration of Study Treatment | Pain Relief combined with pain Intensity Difference (PRID) represented pain relief scores combined with Pain Intensity difference (PID) scores. PRID score ranges from -3 (the worst) through +7 (the most improved). Higher score indicates treatment response. Mean change from Baseline (that is, 0 hours after tooth extraction) at specified end time points were evaluated. | 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Time to Reach the Onset of Drug Efficacy and Time to Recurrence of Pain After the Onset of Drug Efficacy | Time to reach the onset of drug efficacy (TOE) means time took by participants for the onset of relief from pain after tooth-extraction and time to recurrence of pain (TOR) after the onset of drug efficacy (that is, duration of drug efficacy) were assessed after study drug treatment. | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Categorical Score for Patient Impressions | Percentage of participants with patient impressions were assessed on categories, that are: worked well; worked; worked a little; and didn't work. | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Number of Participants Treated With a Relief Analgesic | Participants who were treated with a relief analgesic were assessed. Analgesics are the compounds capable of relieving pain without the loss of consciousness. | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Response Based on Evaluation Criteria for Efficacy of Analgesics in Post-Tooth-Extraction Pain | Percentage of participants were assessed with treatment response based on "evaluation criteria for efficacy of analgesics in post-tooth-extraction pain" for the efficacy of analgesics used to treat pain following tooth extraction. Participants were assessed as "very effective, effective, somewhat effective and ineffective" for the following categories: Pain suppression (PS), speed of pain relief (SPR), duration of pain relief (DPR), general effectiveness (GE). Participants judged the treatment as "extremely useful, useful, not useful & could not be assessed" for overall evaluation (OE). | Baseline up to 8 hours post-administration of study treatment | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
| Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|