Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00712712
Other study ID # CDR0000589594
Secondary ID IB-MEDORIB-2007-
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date December 24, 2007
Est. completion date March 16, 2016

Study information

Verified date March 2021
Source Institut Bergonié
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Morphine may reduce pain in patients who have undergone radiofrequency ablation to remove bone metastases. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well morphine works after radiofrequency ablation of painful bone metastases in patients with cancer.


Description:

OBJECTIVES: Primary - Measure the efficacy of morphine sulfate at 8 weeks after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of bone metastases. Secondary - Assess minimum and average pain and analyze use of morphine sulfate before and after RFA. - Determine disease progression by CT scan of bone. - Evaluate the percentage of relief associated with RFA, specifically patient satisfaction, quality of life, anxiety, depression, and physical performance during RFA. - Assess complications and side effects related to RFA and the evolution of possible side effects associated with morphine sulfate therapy. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients complete a pain questionnaire over 1 week before undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Patients also complete questionnaires about pain, physical performance, quality of life (QOL), and anxiety at baseline. Bone metastases are removed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). After surgery, patients receive acetaminophen and patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) morphine sulfate. PCA morphine sulfate continues with a dose increase of 50% bolus every 24 hours. Patients with maximum pain less than or equal to that at inclusion receive standard morphine sulfate therapy instead. Data concerning the total dose of PCA morphine sulfate; minimum, average, and maximum pain intensity; side effects and complications of RFA; and total dose of morphine sulfate (or equivalent) is collected daily. Pain is assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after RFA. Patients complete follow-up questionnaires about physical performance, QOL, and anxiety at 12 weeks. Patients also undergo a CT scan at 12 weeks.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 78
Est. completion date March 16, 2016
Est. primary completion date February 11, 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: - Histologically confirmed cancer - Primary or unknown origin - Painful bone metastases despite radiotherapy or symptomatic relapse into previously irradiated area with no possibility of repeating radiotherapy - Bone metastases may have been treated with bisphosphonates - Osteolytic bone or joint (lytic and condensed) confirmed by CT scan and meeting the following criteria: - Lesion size = 5 cm - No more than 2 painful bone metastases - If 2 lesions are to be treated, distinct anatomical locations can be treated at the same time - Metastatic bone lesions of the pelvis, sacrum (in absence of canal involvement), ribs, or long bones allowed - Pain located at the tumor or in the area - Maximum pain in the last 24 hours > 4 points (numerical scale to 11 points) PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: - Life expectancy > 3 months - Platelet count > 50,000/µL - Prothrombin < 50% - Activated cephalin time = 1.5 times normal - Not pregnant - Fertile patients must use effective contraception - No geographical, social, or psychiatric reason that would preclude follow up PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: - See Disease Characteristics - At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy - At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy or bisphosphonates - At least 1 week since beginning new painkiller therapy or anticoagulation treatment - More than 30 days since participation in another drug study - More than 30 days since prior surgery

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Acetaminophen
Intravenous administration of paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Morphine Sulfate
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), allowing morphine consumption to be titrated to the patient's needs and thus allowing morphine doses to be adapted to an increase in pain in the patient's post-operative period or a rapid analgesic effect of radiofrequency.
Other:
Questionnaire administration
Pain notebook will allow the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned, containing information on : The intensity of the minimum, average and maximum pain of the last 24 months. hours as well as the intensity of the pain of the moment according to a scale 11-point digital, the background morphine analgesic treatment during the last 24 hours, the morphine analgesic treatment taken during painful attacks, the possible undesirable effects of morphine treatment. the morphinic, non-morphinic and co-antalgic treatment is noted, as well as that the total dose of oral morphine or oral morphine equivalent
Procedure:
Quality-of-life assessment
Patients' quality of life will be assessed using the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 at inclusion in the study and at 8 weeks after radiofrequency. ablation.
Radiofrequency ablation
Recent technique of thermal destruction of tumors. This technique consists of inserting an electrode needle into the tumour under X-ray or ultrasound guidance or intraoperatively under laparoscopy for example. This needle carries a current or a light wave depending on the characteristics of the generator to which it is connected (radiofrequency, laser). Radio frequencies are radiation non-ionising electromagnets. In this context of tissue ablathermia wavelengths ranging from 400kHz to 500kHz.

Locations

Country Name City State
France Institute Bergonié Bordeaux

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Institut Bergonié

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants With Maximum Pain Level Decreased by = 2 Points at 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to an 11-point numerical scale
Rate of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their most intense pain, 2 months after the radiofrequency ablation.
This rate is calculated for the evaluable population for the principal outcome measure.
This rate is equal to the ratio of the number of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their maximum pain divided by the size of the evaluable population.
The response rate considered acceptable is 50%, above this threshold the treatment will be considered potentially effective and may be proposed in phase III.
2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Secondary Difference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to a discrete 11-points numerical scale.
Increased/decreased pain is considered as a variation of at least one point on the numerical scale.
If 25 patients or more are observed with pain reduction of 2 or more points, then the treatment will be considered potentially effective.
Inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected at the pre-selection visit.
First algology assessment at pre-selection visit
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected at the inclusion visit.
Second algology assessment at inclusion visit
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected one day before radiofrequency (J-1).
Algology assessment one day before radiofrequency (J-1)
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected one day after radiofrequency (J+1).
Algology assessment one day after radiofrequency: J+1
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected at the discharge from hospital visit.
Algology assessment at the discharge from hospital visit
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected 7 days after discharge from hospital.
Algology assessment 7 days after discharge from hospital
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected 1 month after radiofrequency.
Algology assessment 1 month after radiofrequency
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected 2 months after radiofrequency.
Algology assessment 2 months after radiofrequency
Secondary Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at:
Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation,
Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment)
J-1: one day before radiofrequency
J+1: One day after radiofrequency
Discharge from hospital
7 days after discharge from hospital
1 month after radiofrequency
2 months after radiofrequency
3 months after radiofrequency
Here, are presented only data collected 3 months after radiofrequency.
Algology assessment 3 months after radiofrequency
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Preselection: First algology visit (within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation)
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Inclusion: Second algology visit (One week after the first algology visit)
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
J-1 (One day before radiofrequency)
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
Discharge from hospital
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
7 days after discharge
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
1 month after radiofrequency
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
2 months after radiofrequency
Secondary Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day.
This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency.
3 months after radiofrequency
Secondary Total Intravenous Morphine Dose (mg) Total intravenous dose of morphine 24 hours after the radiofrequency was assessed during the patient's hospital stay.
As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
24 hours after radiofrequency
Secondary Bolus Dose in mg Administered by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). 24 hours after radiofrequency
Secondary Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30) Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions :
5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties;
1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL
Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
Inclusion
Secondary Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30) Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions :
5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties;
1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL
Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
2 months after radiofrequency
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05559255 - Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI N/A
Terminated NCT04356352 - Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04748367 - Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care N/A
Completed NCT05057988 - Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain N/A
Completed NCT04466111 - Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
Recruiting NCT06206252 - Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
Completed NCT05868122 - A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05006976 - A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study N/A
Completed NCT03273114 - Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06087432 - Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT05508594 - Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001 Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03646955 - Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Completed NCT03678168 - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT03931772 - Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program N/A
Completed NCT03286543 - Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System N/A
Completed NCT02913027 - Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams? N/A
Terminated NCT02181387 - Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor? Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06032559 - Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03613155 - Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care

External Links