Pain Clinical Trial
— MEDOROfficial title:
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Radiofrequency Ablation for Reducing Refractory Pain From Bone Metastases
Verified date | March 2021 |
Source | Institut Bergonié |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
RATIONALE: Morphine may reduce pain in patients who have undergone radiofrequency ablation to remove bone metastases. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well morphine works after radiofrequency ablation of painful bone metastases in patients with cancer.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 78 |
Est. completion date | March 16, 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | February 11, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: - Histologically confirmed cancer - Primary or unknown origin - Painful bone metastases despite radiotherapy or symptomatic relapse into previously irradiated area with no possibility of repeating radiotherapy - Bone metastases may have been treated with bisphosphonates - Osteolytic bone or joint (lytic and condensed) confirmed by CT scan and meeting the following criteria: - Lesion size = 5 cm - No more than 2 painful bone metastases - If 2 lesions are to be treated, distinct anatomical locations can be treated at the same time - Metastatic bone lesions of the pelvis, sacrum (in absence of canal involvement), ribs, or long bones allowed - Pain located at the tumor or in the area - Maximum pain in the last 24 hours > 4 points (numerical scale to 11 points) PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: - Life expectancy > 3 months - Platelet count > 50,000/µL - Prothrombin < 50% - Activated cephalin time = 1.5 times normal - Not pregnant - Fertile patients must use effective contraception - No geographical, social, or psychiatric reason that would preclude follow up PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: - See Disease Characteristics - At least 4 weeks since prior radiotherapy - At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy or bisphosphonates - At least 1 week since beginning new painkiller therapy or anticoagulation treatment - More than 30 days since participation in another drug study - More than 30 days since prior surgery |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Institute Bergonié | Bordeaux |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Institut Bergonié |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants With Maximum Pain Level Decreased by = 2 Points at 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) | Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to an 11-point numerical scale
Rate of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their most intense pain, 2 months after the radiofrequency ablation. This rate is calculated for the evaluable population for the principal outcome measure. This rate is equal to the ratio of the number of patients with a decrease of two or more points in their maximum pain divided by the size of the evaluable population. The response rate considered acceptable is 50%, above this threshold the treatment will be considered potentially effective and may be proposed in phase III. |
2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) | |
Secondary | Difference in Maximum Pain Scores Between Inclusion and 2 Months After Radiofrequency Ablation | Difference in maximum pain scores between inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) according to a discrete 11-points numerical scale.
Increased/decreased pain is considered as a variation of at least one point on the numerical scale. If 25 patients or more are observed with pain reduction of 2 or more points, then the treatment will be considered potentially effective. |
Inclusion and 2 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the pre-selection visit. |
First algology assessment at pre-selection visit | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the inclusion visit. |
Second algology assessment at inclusion visit | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected one day before radiofrequency (J-1). |
Algology assessment one day before radiofrequency (J-1) | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected one day after radiofrequency (J+1). |
Algology assessment one day after radiofrequency: J+1 | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected at the discharge from hospital visit. |
Algology assessment at the discharge from hospital visit | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 7 days after discharge from hospital. |
Algology assessment 7 days after discharge from hospital | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 1 month after radiofrequency. |
Algology assessment 1 month after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 2 months after radiofrequency. |
Algology assessment 2 months after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Intensity of Pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) | According to a discrete 11-points numerical scale which ranges from 0 (low pain) to 11 (intense pain), intensity of pain (Minimum, Average, Maximum) has been evaluated at different time point between pre-selection and up to 3 months after radiofrequency.
Assessment of intensity of pain has been done in this order at: Pre-selection visit: First algology assessment within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation, Inclusion visit: Second algology assessment (One week after the first algology assessment) J-1: one day before radiofrequency J+1: One day after radiofrequency Discharge from hospital 7 days after discharge from hospital 1 month after radiofrequency 2 months after radiofrequency 3 months after radiofrequency Here, are presented only data collected 3 months after radiofrequency. |
Algology assessment 3 months after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
Preselection: First algology visit (within a week (± 3 days) after the radiology consultation) | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
Inclusion: Second algology visit (One week after the first algology visit) | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
J-1 (One day before radiofrequency) | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
Discharge from hospital | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
7 days after discharge | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
1 month after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
2 months after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Oral Morphine Consumption or Oral Morphine Equivalent (Immediate and Sustained Release Forms) (mg) Per Day | Patients were provided with a pain notebook. This notebook allowed the patient to describe the pain specific to the metastasis concerned.
In particular, information about the dose of oral morphine consumption or oral morphine equivalent in mg per day. This pain notebook has been evaluated between the radiology consultation and three months after radiofrequency. |
3 months after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Total Intravenous Morphine Dose (mg) | Total intravenous dose of morphine 24 hours after the radiofrequency was assessed during the patient's hospital stay.
As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). |
24 hours after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Bolus Dose in mg Administered by Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) | As a reminder, the post-operative analgesic treatment included intravenous paracetamol (4 g / 24h) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). | 24 hours after radiofrequency | |
Secondary | Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30) | Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions :
5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties; 1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health. |
Inclusion | |
Secondary | Standardised Quality of Life Scores (EORTC - QLQ-C30) | Quality of life Questionnaire -Core 30 (QLQ-C30) developed in 1986 by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) assesses quality of life across 15 dimensions :
5 functional dimensions : Physical functioning, Role functioning, Emotional, Cognitive functioning, Social functioning; 9 symptomatic dimensions: Fatigue, Nausea and vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Insomnia, Appetite loss, Diarrhoea, Financial difficulties; 1 global health dimension: Global health status/QoL Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health. |
2 months after radiofrequency |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05559255 -
Changes in Pain, Spasticity, and Quality of Life After Use of Counterstrain Treatment in Individuals With SCI
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04356352 -
Lidocaine, Esmolol, or Placebo to Relieve IV Propofol Pain
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04748367 -
Leveraging on Immersive Virtual Reality to Reduce Pain and Anxiety in Children During Immunization in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05057988 -
Virtual Empowered Relief for Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04466111 -
Observational, Post Market Study in Treating Chronic Upper Extremity Limb Pain
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06206252 -
Can Medical Cannabis Affect Opioid Use?
|
||
Completed |
NCT05868122 -
A Study to Evaluate a Fixed Combination of Acetaminophen/Naproxen Sodium in Acute Postoperative Pain Following Bunionectomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05006976 -
A Naturalistic Trial of Nudging Clinicians in the Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic. The NSAC Nudge Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03273114 -
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06087432 -
Is PNF Application Effective on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05508594 -
Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Intranasally Administered Sufentanil, Ketamine, and CT001
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03646955 -
Partial Breast Versus no Irradiation for Women With Early Breast Cancer
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03472300 -
Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
|
||
Completed |
NCT03678168 -
A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03931772 -
Online Automated Self-Hypnosis Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03286543 -
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the SPRINT Beta System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02913027 -
Can We Improve the Comfort of Pelvic Exams?
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02181387 -
Acetaminophen Use in Labor - Does Use of Acetaminophen Reduce Neuraxial Analgesic Drug Requirement During Labor?
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06032559 -
Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness Oriented Recovery Enhancement as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03613155 -
Assessment of Anxiety in Patients Treated by SMUR Toulouse and Receiving MEOPA as Part of Their Care
|