View clinical trials related to Neoplasm Metastasis.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to characterize the quality of life change in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to end-stage renal failure.
The goal of this prospective, single-arm exploratory clinical study is to explore the safty and efficacy of whole-brain radiotherapy combined with Thiotepa sheath injection combined With Systemic Therapy for the Primary Disease in the Treatment of Meningeal Metastases in Solid Tumors How works well was the combined therapy？ How safe was combined therapy？ Participants will receive whole brain radiotherapy combined with intrathecal injection of Thiotepa twice a week for a total of 4 weeks. Evaluate the efficacy and safety every 2 cycles. Researchers will evaluate whether this combination treatment is safe and whether it is more effective than previous studies.
To evaluate the efficacy of nilatinib maleate tablets combined with capecitabine in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced esophageal/esophagogastric junction/gastric adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis.
This is a phase Ib/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of zunsemetinib (ATI-450) with capecitabine in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
This is a Phase 3 extension, global, multicenter study to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of tolebrutinib in adult participants (aged ≥18 years) with RMS, PPMS, or NRSPMS who were previously enrolled in the Phase 2b LTS (LTS16004) or 1 of the 4 Phase 3 tolebrutinib pivotal trials (GEMINI 1 [EFC16033], GEMINI 2 [EFC16034], HERCULES [EFC16645], or PERSEUS [EFC16035]). SUBSTUDY: ToleDYNAMIC substudy
To find out if local consolidation therapy (such as radiation therapy with or without other local therapies such as surgery, ablation [the removal or destruction of a body part or tissue or its function], or embolization [a procedure that uses particles, such as tiny gelatin sponges or beads, to block a blood vessel]) to all progressive sites of disease can help to control the disease compared with next-line systemic therapy.
BDMO is an Italian multicentre, observational, prospective study that collects data from all patients with bone metastases referred to each participating centre, using an on-line software 'tailor-made' for data collection.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel minimally invasive drug delivery system for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). It has been considered as a safe and feasible palliative treatment alternative proven by previous phase I studies. Currently available evidence on feasibility, efficacy and tolerability in Asian populations is limited. In this open-label, single-arm, monocentric clinical trial, investigators aim to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and complications of PIPAC with oxaliplatin as an alternative on patients of unresectable colorectal cancer with PM and doxorubicin and cisplatin on patients of unresectable gastric and pancreatic cancers with PM. Alternative regimen can be considered multidisciplinary tumour board meeting. Patients will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria and treated for 3 cycles of PIPAC and concurrent systemic chemotherapy. The goal was to repeat PIPAC every 6-8 weeks for at least three procedures, and the delay of the systemic chemotherapy is 2 weeks before and after each PIPAC procedure. If PM was considered to become resectable during PIPAC, patients were discussed at the multidisciplinary tumour board for curative intent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The primary outcome is the clinical benefit rate (CBR), measured by an independent radiologist according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) assessed by laparoscopy and histopathological tumour response evaluated by pathologists blinded to clinical outcomes. Key secondary outcomes include the major and minor treatment-related adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTACE) up to 4 weeks after the treatment, Cytological tumour response of peritoneal lavage or ascites, treatment-related characteristics, hospital stay, progression-free survival, overall survival and readmission rate. The proposed study duration is 3 years from the start date and the estimated sample size is 51 according to centre capacity.
This study aims at enrolling patients with solid tumors at metastatic stage, considered long responders to immunotherapy (> 6 months) and displaying disease progression. In this study, the investigator wants to evaluate specific modalities of stereotactic radiotherapy, with 3 sessions, each of 8 Gy, lasting 20 minutes and spaced 72 hours apart (Day 1, Day 4, Day 7). The radiotherapy device itself is not the subject of this study and will be used in accordance with its CE mark and indications. The objective of the study is to assess the ability of stereotactic radiotherapy to restore the lost efficacy of immunotherapy. In particular, the abscopal effect will be assessed, i.e. the action of irradiating a particular target lesion and observing an effect on other distant metastases.
This international multi-centre phase 3 randomized control trial investigates whether giving a very high dose of radiation in a single treatment session (ultra-high dose: experimental) using advanced technology called MR-Linac is more effective than a high dose (control) for treating liver tumors that have spread from other parts of the body (liver metastases). This study also aims to identify predictors of treatment response and side effects by analyzing various factors such as imaging markers and genetic profiles. Liver metastases are common in several cancers, but surgery is often not feasible for many patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which delivers focused radiation to tumors, is an alternative treatment option. Previous studies have shown promising results with SBRT, but the optimal radiation dose for liver metastases is still uncertain. This study will look at patients with specific types of primary cancers known to respond well to SBRT. Treatment effectiveness will be assessed by monitoring tumor control, overall survival, and quality of life. By comparing ultra-high dose SBRT with standard high dose, the study aims to determine if the former can provide better tumor control with fewer side effects. If successful, this approach could offer a significant advancement in the treatment of liver metastases, potentially improving outcomes and quality of life for patients.