View clinical trials related to Pain, Procedural.
Filter by:Main objective : Evaluate the effect of using a virtual reality mask during the blood test and pricks tests in allergic children aged from 7 to 13 years. Hypothesis : Using virtual reality mask during blood test and pricks tests for allergic kids from 7 to 13 would reduce anxiety and pain
This pilot study will be testing the feasibility of medical hypnosis through virtual reality during invasive médical procédures in children with cancer. Patients age from 7 to under 18 years whose treatement protocols required a lumbure puncture and a chemotherapy by implantable venous access will be randomly assigned to virtual reality or treatement as usual (nitrous oxide, anxiolytics, opioid analgesics, psychotropic and benzodiazepine). We expect the same benefit by using VR as usual intervention.
The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Children aged 5-9 years with primary molars from suffered symptomatic signs of irreversible pulpitis will be randomly assigned into two groups. The first group (experimental group) will be injected with 4% articaine 1:100.000 epinephrine (inferior alveolar nerve block). For the second group, the mandibular second primary molars will be anesthetized using 4% articaine 1:100.000 epinephrine using inferior alveolar nerve block.
The purpose of this study is to assess the use of virtual reality (VR) as an adjunct or alternative to pharmacologic sedation in pediatric patients undergoing renal biopsy.
Main objective : Evaluate the effect of using a virtual reality mask during the peripheral intravenous catheter insertion in a pediatric day hospital on the pain and anxiety in children from 6 to 11 years old. Hypothesis : Using virtual reality mask during the peripheral intravenous catheter insertion would reduce the 6 to 11 child's pain, the children and parents' anxiety, would improve satisfaction of children, parents and nurse about the care and would reduce time and cost of the procedure.
Medical procedures can be a very frightening experience for children. It is known that children who received painful medical procedures can develop a higher sensitivity of pain during their following experiences. During their treatments for malignant diseases, children are exposed to a lot of painful procedures (eg. needle insertion, lumbar punction, myelogram, etc…) Therefore, medical societies propose the use of interventions like distraction techniques for pain management in complement of pharmacological treatment. In addition, the repetitions of painful procedures and ineffective prevention of pain can create care phobia. Within this context, immersive and participative virtual reality (VR) could be an innovative distraction technique for pain management among children undergoing medical procedures. Attention Pain Theory can explain how virtual reality can reduce the perception of pain. Attention is required to feel pain. When the patient is focused on another subject like an immersive virtual environment, his brain is less available to treat information like painful stimulus from care procedures. The investigators hypothesis is that VR can reduce procedural-related pain and can decrease fear during the following procedures. Results of previous studies are varied : some showed a non-significant reduction of patient's procedural pain despite the use of VR, whereas others concluded to a decrease of pain. The question of the benefit of VR for the patients who are exposed to repeated painful procedures remains still unclear, especially with patients who are likely to feel chronic pain or many pain-related exposures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of virtual reality as a distraction technique for pain management in children and adolescents with onco-hematological diseases, undergoing painful procedures, compared to standard of care.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Xylocaine impregnated compress in reducing per-procedural pain during ultrasound-guided infiltration of Trigger Finger
The aim of this randomized controlled study with crossover design is to examine the effectiveness of mother-driven interventions, skin-to-skin contact (SSC) and recorded mother's heartbeats as sound and vibration (MHB), compared to oral glucose in relieving neonatal acute pain related to heel lance as a painful procedure. The effectiveness of interventions will be assessed using validated pain scales (PIPP-R and NIAPAS), changes in sensory cortex activation (near-infrared spectroscopy, NIRS) and changes in physiological indicators (oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate). The secondary objectives will include evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in relation to infant recovery and evaluating the use of NIRS monitoring in relation to neonatal pain assessment scales.
Preterm infants are at risk of developing ROP (retinopathy of prematurity), an eye condition that can cause blindness. Preterm infants born before gestation week (GA) 30 are therefor screened regularly with eye examinations. These eye examinations are painful and despite a lot of research no clear method of pain relief have been found. Since pain in the preterm infant can lead to both short- and longterm negative consequences an effective pain relief during these examinations are of importance. In this study we will investigate if Clonidine can be effective as pain-relief during ROP eye examinations.
Pupillometry has been used in healthy volunteers to investigate the usefulness of the pupil light reflex as an indicator of pain intensity on pressure as a nociceptive stimulus. In this sense, it is necessary to check if the pupillometry is sensitive to different types or sources of pain. One of these devices is the Algiscan® portable pupillometer (IdMed, Marseille, France), which we propose to use in the present study. This pupillometer has previously been used in healthy volunteers, and in patients admitted to the intensive care unit, subjected to mechanical ventilation and sedation / analgesia. This study in healthy volunteers aims to evaluate whether the PDR can be a reliable and discriminatory measure of the intensity of nociception, applying various types of nociceptive stimuli. If so, this study could lead to the use of pupillometry as an objective measure of nociception in settings where patients cannot communicate, such as intensive care areas or perioperative settings.