Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04375826
Other study ID # 2003-128-111
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 13, 2020
Est. completion date December 31, 2023

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source Seoul National University Hospital
Contact Jin-Young Jang, M.D., PhD.
Phone 82-2-2072-2194
Email jangjy4@snu.ac.kr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a prospective randomized open-label noninferiority trial that compares thoracic epidural analgesia and continuous preperitoneal analgesia after open pancreaticoduodenectomy.


Description:

In the Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), thoracic epidural analgesia (or epidural analgesia) was considered to be a key analgesic method because it not only effectively controls pain, but also lowers insulin resistance and helps restore bowel movement. However, epidural analgesia can cause a number of side effects despite of effective pain control. Epidural analgesia reduces peripheral vascular resistance by blocking sympathetic nerves with local anesthetics and may cause hypotension and decreasing heart rate. In addition, it can cause orthostatic hypotension, which can interfere with early ambulation after operation. In rare cases, there are potential complications of epidural abscess, meningitis, and epidural hematoma. Continuous peritoneal analgesia using local anesthetics has recently been used as an alternative analgesic to epidural analgesia in open abdomen surgery. This is easier to perform than epidural analgesia and is known to have fewer side effects. Recently, a non-inferiority comparison study have revealed that peritoneal analgesic was not inferior to epidural analgesia in terms of pain control. However, this study included a variety of operations other than PD, and most of the incisions were substernal, not midline. In addition, the method for mounting the epidural catheter was not described. The failure rate of the epidural catheter was reported to be 15%. The investigators will examine the effect of continuous peritoneal analgesic postoperative pain control in patients undergoing open PD to improve postoperative pain management and to create an our own ERAS program. To this end, The investigators will test non-inferiority between epidural analgesia and peritoneal analgesia.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 140
Est. completion date December 31, 2023
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years and older - Disease of periampullary lesions - Elective open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD): PD or pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) - Midline incision - Written informed consent : ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent - Performance status (ECOG scale): 0-1 at the time of enrollment - Physical status (ASA) : 1-2 grade Exclusion Criteria: - History of any abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic/robotic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic/robotic obstetrics and gynecology surgeries,Cesarean section, laparoscopic/robotic prostate surgery) - Emergency operation - History of chronic pain - Chronic use of opioid, analgesics, anti-depressant, anti-epileptics (>1year) - Alcoholics - Impossible to control PCA d/t delirium, cognitive impairment - Contraindication for epidural analgesia - Patients with coagulopathy (INR>1.5, Prothrombin time>1.5, platelets <80x10^9perL) or anti-coagulants - Hypersensitive to fentanyl and ropivacaine - Need other organ resection (ex. Liver, colon) - Intubation

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Epidural patient controlled analgesia
The device is connected to the epidural catheter prior to surgery and drug administration is started during surgery. The continuous infusion rate is 4 ml / hr. When the button is pressed, 2 ml is additionally administered and the lock time is 20 minutes.
Preperitoneal analgesia and IV-PCA
During surgery, the preperitoneal analgesia catheters are inserted into the preperitoneal space and these catheters are connected to the pump with ropivacaine.

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Seoul National University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Numerical rating score for pain at 24 hours after operation The scale of the numerical rating score for pain is 0~10 and higher score is worse outcome.
At 24 hours after operation, NRS pain scores are compared between two groups.
24 hours after operation
Secondary Pain related factors The scale of the numerical rating score for pain is 0~10 and higher score is worse outcome.
Numerical rating score for pain on postoperative day 2 and 3 at 4pm
postoperative day 1,2,and 3
Secondary Overall benefit of analgesia score (OBAS) OBAS on postoperative day 1,2,and 3. This include 7 questions. To calculate the OBAS score, compute the sume of scores in items 1~6 and add "4-socore in item 7". The minimum score is 4 and the maximum is 24.The low score indicates high benefit. postoperative day 1,2,and 3
Secondary Recovery related factors Time to first eat meal, time to first move, time to first gas out Within 1 week after operation
Secondary Postoperative complication factors Clavien-Dindo classification, postoperative pancreatic fistula Within 1 week after operation
Secondary analgesic related factors rescue analgesics amounts, opioid amounts Within 2 week after operation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05480111 - The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT06129305 - Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
Completed NCT04401826 - Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile N/A
Recruiting NCT04020133 - the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. N/A
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03546738 - Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03652103 - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Phase 4
Terminated NCT03261193 - ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT03528343 - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02525133 - Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty Phase 3
Completed NCT03244540 - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05316168 - Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04130464 - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT04574791 - Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT04073069 - Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults Phase 4
Completed NCT04526236 - Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05351229 - Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05543109 - Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block N/A
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT04919317 - Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty Phase 2