Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04222010
Other study ID # PI2019_843_0051
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 2, 2020
Est. completion date September 12, 2023

Study information

Verified date September 2023
Source Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute and chronic postoperative pain remains a major concern following thoracoscopic surgery. Firstly because pain constitutes a serious concern for patients after surgery, and secondarily because an ineffective control of pain may lead to postoperative morbidity, especially in lung cancer surgery. To date, several procedures have been described but the best modality of locoregional analgesia for thoracoscopic surgery has not been assessed yet. The main objective of this study is to evaluate efficiency of several validated approaches for preoperative locoregional analgesia, comparing serratus plain block versus paravertebral block versus serratus plain block and paravertebral block for postoperative pain following thoracoscopic surgery. To this end, the investigators will conduct an interventional prospective monocentric, double blind, compared and randomized study. Previously to thoracoscopic surgery, patients will be randomized in one of the three following arms: serratus plain block, paravertebral block or serratus plain block and paravertebral block combined.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 155
Est. completion date September 12, 2023
Est. primary completion date July 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - adult patient over18 years old - without guardianship - video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with 3 trocars - No cons-indications to loco-regional anesthesia (allergy, skin condition) Exclusion Criteria: - patient under 18 years old - patient under guardianship - pregnant - rejection of consent - rejection of loco-regional anesthesia - chronic pain antecedents under morphine medication - pain assessment impossible

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
loco-regional anesthesia serratus plane bloc (Ropivacaine 2 mg/mL, 40 mL) and paravertebral placebo bloc (saline, 20 mL)
Each patient who underwent thoracoscopic surgery will be assigned to one procedure of Loco-regional anesthesia
Loco-regional anesthesia : paravertebral bloc (Ropivacaine 4 mg/mL, 20 mL) and serratus plane placebo bloc (saline, 40 mL)
Each patient who underwent thoracoscopic surgery will be assigned to one procedure of Loco-regional anesthesia.
Loco-regional anesthesia : serratus plane bloc (Ropivacaine 1,3 mg/mL, 40 mL) and paravertebral bloc (Ropivacaine 1,3 mg/mL, 20 mL)
Each patient who underwent thoracoscopic surgery will be assigned to one procedure of Loco-regional anesthesia.

Locations

Country Name City State
France CHU Amiens Amiens

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
Immediately after following thoracoscopic surgery
Secondary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
H1 = one hour following thoracoscopic surgery
Secondary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
H3 = 3 hours following thoracoscopic surgery
Secondary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
H6 = 6 hours following thoracoscopic surgery
Secondary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
Day1 = one day following thoracoscopic surgery
Secondary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
Day2 = two days following thoracoscopic surgery
Secondary Pain Visual analog scale (VAS) score at coughing Visual analogue scales (VAS) are 10-cm lines anchored at the ends by words that define the bounds of various pain dimensions. The patient is asked to place a vertical mark on the scale to indicate the level of intensity of his or her pain.
Numerical rating scales are similar to analogue scales except that numbers (e.g., 0 to 5) are entered along the scale.
With category scales, the patient is asked to circle the word that best describes his or her condition (e.g., for pain intensity: None, Moderate, Severe, Unbearable).
Day3 = 3 days following thoracoscopic surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05480111 - The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT06129305 - Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
Completed NCT04401826 - Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile N/A
Recruiting NCT04020133 - the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. N/A
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03546738 - Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03652103 - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Phase 4
Terminated NCT03261193 - ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT03528343 - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02525133 - Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty Phase 3
Completed NCT03244540 - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05316168 - Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04130464 - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT04574791 - Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT04526236 - Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing Phase 4
Completed NCT04073069 - Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05351229 - Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05543109 - Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block N/A
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT04919317 - Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty Phase 2