Comparison of Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

A comparison study was performed between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in acute setting in tertiary hospital to access the outcome of postoperative pain and hospital stay. As the popularity of laparoscopic appendectomy has failed in major tertiary hospital due to huge amount of patient load in which open appendectomy was performed.This study was performed to prove that outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy are far better than open appendectomy and to increase the use of laparoscopic surgery in acute settings

Clinical Trial Description

Introduction:

Open appendicectomy has been a safe and usually opted mode of operation for acute appendicitis for more than a century, but since last 10 years laparoscopic appendicectomy is gaining popularity, although still not as popular as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comparison of these two is studied in terms of pain outcome as patient perceives and length of hospital stay.

OBJECTIVES:

The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized control trial

SETTING:

Surgical Unit I, Services Hospital, Lahore

DURATION OF STUDY:

Duration of my study was six months after the approval of synopsis i.e 21-02-2015 to 20-08-2015.

SAMPLE SIZE:

Was calculated using WHO method of calculating sample size.

SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:

Non probability consecutive sampling.

DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:

All patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria was admitted through the emergency after taking approval from hospital Ethical committee. A detailed history had been taken including demographic data (age, address). Patients was requested to sign an informed consent. They had been assured regarding confidentiality and expertise used for the procedure. All procedures was done by a single operating surgical team to control bias. All the data/variables was recorded on a specially designed Performa attached which are post-op pain at 12hrs and 24 hrs, post-Op stay and patient satisfaction score. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03947372
Study type	Interventional
Source	Services Hospital, Lahore
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	February 21, 2015
Completion date	August 20, 2015

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05480111` - The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT06129305` - Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
Completed	`NCT04401826` - Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04020133` - the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.	N/A
Completed	`NCT03023462` - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT03546738` - Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT03652103` - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT03261193` - ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain	Phase 3
Withdrawn	`NCT03528343` - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02525133` - Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT03244540` - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05316168` - Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT04130464` - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management	Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT04574791` - Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT04073069` - Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04526236` - Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT05351229` - Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery	Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05543109` - Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block	N/A
Completed	`NCT05346588` - THRIVE Feasibility Trial	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT04919317` - Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty	Phase 2

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparison of Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms