Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III &

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

A comparison study was performed between Ligasure and Milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy to find out the outcome between these two techniques in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids.This advance vessel sealing device is used to seal the pedicle of the vessel and does not burn the surrounding tissues , so the outcome was monitored in terms of operative time, post operative pain pain, duration of wound healing in 3 weeks and return to normal activities

Clinical Trial Description

INTRODUCTION:

Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is conventional procedure in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids but recent advances in ligasure hemorrhoidectomy have shown to produce favorable results. Comparison of these two is studied in terms of pain outcome as patient perceives, operative time, wound healing and return to normal activities.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the outcome of ligasure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV degree hemorrhoids.

STUDY DESIGN:

Randomized controlled trial

STUDY SETTING:

The study was conducted in surgical unit 1, Services hospital, Lahore.

DURATION OF STUDY:

Study was completed in six months after the approval of synopsis i.e. from 1st April 2014 to 30th September 2014.

DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:

After approval from hospital ethical committee, 100 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria has been recruited from outdoor and emergency department. A detailed history had been taken including demographic data (age, address) and all patients had been clinically examined .Patients was divided in two groups randomly using random number tables. Group A: Conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Group B: Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy. Patients had been requested to sign an informed consent. They had been assured regarding confidentiality and expertise used for the procedure. All procedures have been performed by a single surgical operating team to control bias. Preoperatively operative time was noted. Post operatively pain had been assessed after 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours, wound has been assessed in 2nd and 3rd postoperative week to assess epithelization and return to normal activities in days. All data had been collected and recorded on the Proforma ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03848468
Study type	Interventional
Source	Services Hospital, Lahore
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	April 1, 2014
Completion date	September 30, 2014

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05480111` - The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT06129305` - Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
Completed	`NCT04401826` - Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04020133` - the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.	N/A
Completed	`NCT03023462` - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT03546738` - Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT03652103` - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT03261193` - ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain	Phase 3
Withdrawn	`NCT03528343` - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02525133` - Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT03244540` - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05316168` - Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT04130464` - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management	Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT04574791` - Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty	N/A
Completed	`NCT04526236` - Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04073069` - Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT05351229` - Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery	Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05543109` - Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block	N/A
Completed	`NCT05346588` - THRIVE Feasibility Trial	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT04919317` - Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty	Phase 2

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms