Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trial
Official title:
Assessment of Pain in Surgical Patient by PMD 200
The trial will estimate post-operative pain management in elective surgical patients using the PMD-200 device. The device measures physiological parameters by placing a non-invasive sensor on a fingertip and displays an objective pain level in a 0-100 scale. The pain level will be estimated before surgery (baseline), after surgery and during administration of parenteral analgesia. Treatment and analgesia will be given according to clinical considerations and standard ward protocols. The device measurements won't influence the treatment.
1. Background The key to adequate pain management is assessing its presence, duration and
severity, identifying those who require intervention, and evaluating the treatment
efficacy. Pain relates to both the noxious input, via peripheral nerves, and to central
modulation, thereby, integrating different modalities such as affect, experience or
personality. Nociception refers to the peripheral and central nervous system (CNS)
processing of information about the internal or external environment, as generated by
activation of nociceptors. Typically, noxious stimuli, including tissue injury, activate
nociceptors that are present in peripheral structures and that transmit information to
the spinal cord dorsal horn (or its trigeminal homologue - the nucleus caudalis). From
there, the information continues to the brainstem and ultimately the cerebral cortex,
where the perception of pain is generated. The pain is a product of higher brain center
processing, whereas nociception can occur in the absence of pain.
Objective assessment of nociception poses a multitude of challenges. First, sedated or
unconscious patients by definition cannot experience pain. Under these circumstances, it
is more accurate to assess the nociception level. A body of research suggests that not
managing nociception can lead to central changes in pain pathways that predispose
individuals to chronic pain states.
Current "gold-standard" pain assessment tools rely on self-reporting, requiring an
individual both to process external information and to communicate this personal
experience.
Circumstances exist where self-reporting is not possible, or where it is unreliable. In
these situations, surrogate markers utilize changes in behavioral or physiological
parameters. However, their use can be associated with considerable shortcomings. They
may be unreliable, hampered by observational bias, or influenced by disease processes or
pharmacological interventions. Developing an objective method of pain assessment
therefore needs to ensure tools that are sensitive and specific to pain. They need to be
observer-independent, not reliant on the patient's ability to communicate and not
influenced by disease characteristics.
A novel measure of nociception is the nociception level (NoL) index. It is based on
objective measures related to changes in the autonomic nervous system. The NoL index
ranges from 0 to 100 and is based on a nonlinear combination of nociception-related
physiologic variables, specifically heart rate, heart rate variability at the 0.15- to
0.4-Hz band power, photoplethysmograph wave amplitude , skin conductance level, number
of skin conductance fluctuations, and their time derivatives.
In the trial the invastigator assume that combination of several parameters into a
single one (Nol Index) may have a stronger association with pain intensity than each of
the parameters alone.
Medasense Biometrics Ltd. developed the PMD-200, a nociception/pain monitor that is
based on a patented, non-invasive technology enabling objective, continuous assessment
of changes in pain level. Information is collected through a finger-mounted probe that
monitors changes in multiple pain-related physiological parameters (pulse rate,
photoplethismograph amplitude, heart rate variability, skin conductance level and number
of skin conductance fluctuations). This information is analyzed using proprietary
artificial intelligence algorithms, which convert the physiological data to a real-time
nociception Index.
The rationale for developing the device is to provide caregivers with the ability to
measure pain level (or nociception level for unconscious patients) during any procedure
and at any time. This information can prevent unnecessary pain, avoid overdose or under
usage of analgesic agents, enhance recovery and decrease hospitalization time and costs,
while answering the critical need to supervise patients' pain/nociception level.
The finger probe sensor of PMD-200 collects the following signals:
1. PhotoPlethysmograph (PPG) - used to optically obtain a volumetric measurement of
the finger's tip blood vessels. The trace is generated by light emitted from a LED
(~780nm) and collected by a photo diode.
2. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) - used to measure the electrical conductance of the
skin, which varies with its moisture level. The conductance is obtained by
injecting a current between two electrodes placed on the finger and measuring the
voltage.
3. Temperature (TMP) - used to measure the skin temperature using a thermistor.
4. Accelerometer (ACC) - used to measure finger movements The technology consists of
measurements of a number of pain-related physiological parameters that corresponds
with the autonomic nervous system's response to pain, and using the company's
proprietary algorithms, 'translating' these measurements into an index that
represents the pain response, the NoLâ„¢ (Nociception Level) Index. This index is
displayed on a bedside monitor.
The measurements taken by the Medasense monitor include galvanic skin response,
photoplethysmography , skin temperature and movement .
All measurements are taken simultaneously using a single finger probe attached to the
patient's finger. Miniature sensors are embedded into the probe, which includes reusable
and single use components. The finger probe is connected to the bedside monitor for
processing of the data.
Operating the PMD-200 monitor is similar to other standard-of-care systems that track
changes in patients' vital functions, such as heart rate, blood pressure or blood oxygen
saturation. Such monitors obtain their information from sensing element(s) attached to
the patient, display the respective clinical values on a bedside, generate relevant
alerts, and maintain records of the information tracked.
2. Methods Population study - electively patients that are going to underwent laparoscopic
cholecystectomy.
1. First measurement will be taken a day before surgery by placing the device on a
patient's 3rd finger for 3-5 minutes in a quiet environment. The measurement will
be the NOL value (baseline) without pain. The patient will be asked to estimate the
pain level using VAS (visual analog scale) score of 0-10.
2. After determining the NOL value, an IV catheter will be inserted, as required
pre-operatively.
3. The device will continue measuring the pain level while the patient will be asked
to estimate the pain level again using VAS .
4. The patient will be operated.
5. The patient will receive post-operative analgesia according to ward protocol - PRN
IV Dipyrone 1g or PRN IV Paracetamol 1g.
6. The device will measure pain from 5 minutes before until 20 minutes after
analgesics administration. During this time VAS score will be taken. This measure
will be taken up to 3 times during the post-operative hospitalization.
7. The measurement will be taken in a quiet environment without distractions. Any
distraction during measurement will be noted as an EVENT.
3. Aims
1. To examine the response of NoL Index in relation to pain
2. To develop objective tool to assess the severity of pain in post-operative patient.
;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT05480111 -
The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT06129305 -
Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04401826 -
Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04020133 -
the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03023462 -
Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03546738 -
Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03652103 -
Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
|
Phase 4 | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT03528343 -
Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03261193 -
ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT02525133 -
Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT03244540 -
Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05316168 -
Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction
|
Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04130464 -
Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management
|
Phase 4 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04574791 -
Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04073069 -
Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04526236 -
Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05351229 -
Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
| Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05543109 -
Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05346588 -
THRIVE Feasibility Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04919317 -
Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty
|
Phase 2 |