Total Hip Arthroplasty: Multiple Blocks by UltraSound — THAMBUS  

Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trial

Official title: The Effect of Ultrasound Guided Blockade of the Femoral Nerve, the Anterior Division of the Obturator Nerve, and the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve on Postoperative Pain, Morphine Consumption, and Mobilization After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty may experience severe postoperative pain. This is normally treated with opioids, which can cause side effects such as nausea, vomiting, obstipation and sedation. The hypothesis is that patients receiving peripheral nerve blockade of three nerves leading pain stimuli from the hip will experience less pain, will consume less opioid and therefore have less side effects, and will be mobilized more quickly than patients not receiving the peripheral nerve blockade.

Clinical Trial Description

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may cause significant postoperative pain. The patients are often elderly, and frequently have other diseases or ailments. Postoperative pain treatment must focus on effective pain relief, keeping adverse effects to a minimum, enhancing physical rehabilitation and reducing postoperative morbidity.

Postoperative pain after hip surgery can be treated in different ways; i.e. paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids, peripheral nerve blocks and epidural catheter. The choice seems to be influenced by local experience, education and personal preferences. Frequently, a multimodal approach is used with a combination of weak analgetics, opioids and maybe regional anaesthetic techniques.

The sensory innervation of the hip is through branches from the lumbar and sacral plexuses. The femoral nerve (FN), the obturator nerve (anterior branch) (ONA) and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LCFN) all stem from the lumbar plexus. The FN and ONA directly supply the hip joint. LCFN innervates the skin on the lateral part of the thigh, where the incision for THA is often made.

The psoas compartment block provides good pain relief after THA, but the block can be associated with more frequent complications than other regional blockades for the lower extremity. Furthermore, the technique is difficult, and requires sub-specialized anaesthetists. In addition, it is often necessary to use electrical nerve stimulation together with ultrasound guidance to achieve a sufficient block.

Blockade of the FN is standard for hip fractures in our hospital, but not standard for THA. Because of the analgetic effect in hip fractures, the PROSPECT group recommends blockade of FN for THA as well, though specific evidence is scarce on the subject.

Blockade of the obturator nerve has been shown to provide pain relief for the hip joint, although the findings are not consistent, probably because of the varying innervation of the hip. The nerve is difficult to locate blindly, and location by nerve stimulator can be uncomfortable for the patient. Furthermore, the anatomic variations of the nerve and its branches is quite substantial.

Previously, nerves were located by surface anatomic landmarks or by nerve stimulation. In the past 6-7 years, the use of ultrasound guidance has become an increasingly effective aid for applying peripheral nerve blockades with continuingly improving technology.

Ultrasound-guided blockade of the three nerves (FN, ONA and LFCN) for postoperative pain treatment for THA is to our knowledge not previously described in the literature. From our knowledge of the anatomic course of the nerves, the investigators assume that the blockades can provide effective pain relief in this clinical context.

Our aim in this trial is to study the effect of ultrasound-guided periferal nerve blockade of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve (anterior branch), and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve on postoperative pain, opioid consumption and mobilization after THA.

The investigators want to describe the effect of blockade of the three nerves on pain, compared to placebo (injections with a well-known local analgesic drug compared to injections with isotonic saline).

Because it is desirable to have the patient mobilized as quickly as possible after operation, it seems optimal to cause as little motor blockade as possible. The investigators therefore also want to investigate whether pain relief with blockade of ONA and LCFN without blockade of FN is better than or equal to placebo.

The investigators want to study the possible differences in adverse effects, including motor blockade, between the groups with active nerve blockades, with and without blockade of FN. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pain, Postoperative

• NCT number: NCT01276925
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Bispebjerg Hospital
• Contact: Birgitte M Krogh, MD
• Phone: +45 50507405
• Email: sommanbehager@yahoo.dk
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 2011
• Completion date: May 2016