View clinical trials related to Pain, Neuropathic.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of neuropathic pain due to type 2 diabetes on balance and gait. The study is a prospective controlled study. The study is being carried out at the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Center Gait Analysis Laboratory Unit in Turkey. Individuals diagnosed with neuropathic pain due to Type 2 Diabetes and individuals with diabetes without neuropathic pain are included in the study by clinical examination and tests by a physician. At the same time, healthy individuals are participating as the control group. There will 3 groups in the study : Group 1: Individuals diagnosed with neuropathic pain due to type 2 diabetes (n=14) Group 2: Individuals with type 2 diabetes but no neuropathic pain (n=14) Group 3: Healthy control group (n=14) Assessments: Individual and clinical characteristics of individuals: age, gender, height, body weight, marital status, education level, duration of complaints, and dominant side. Douleur Neuropathique en 4 questions (DN4) Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Pain Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Gait analysis Static and dynamic balance The data will be analyzed using the statistical program for social sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). The data will be expressed as mean standard deviation (X±SD) and number (n%). The homogeneity of the groups will be evaluated with the Levene Test. Balance, plantar pressure, and walking values between the groups will be compared using the Kruskal Wallis Test. All the statistical analyses will be set a priori at an alpha level of p<0.05.
Distal sensory peripheral neuropathy (DSP) is a chronic, debilitating painful condition affecting quality of life in persons living with Type 2 diabetes. Treatments prescribed to manage DSP pain, such as nonnarcotic and narcotic analgesics, antidepressants and anticonvulsants, are largely ineffective. This is a preliminary study at assessing the feasibility, efficiency and preliminary efficacy of a novel non-pharmacologic pain management approach, moxibustion, to reduce DSP pain and improve quality of life.
The most common entrapment neuropathy symptoms, the diagnosis of CTS, is determined by examination findings and by means of the results of electro-diagnostic test. With an increase in disease severity, trap neuropathy, whose symptoms are more pronounced at night, negatively affects the daily life of the person. Deterioration in sleep quality may cause depression and anxiety. Conflicting results have been found in the studies related to these findings. However, no study was found in which daytime sleepiness was evaluated in terms of CTS. The investigators aim in this study is to evaluate the relationship between CTS severity and depression, anxiety, sleep quality and daytime sleepiness.
This is a double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) which compares the effectiveness of three surgical techniques for alleviating residual limb pain (RLP), neuroma pain and phantom limb pain (PLP). The three surgical treatments are Targeted Muscles Reinnervation (TMR), Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI), and an active control (neuroma excision and muscle burying). Patients will be follow-up for 4 years.
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether a new spinal cord stimulation paradigm, called Coordinate Reset (CR) Stimulation, can provide equivalent or better pain relief with reduced energy requirements. The investigators will test this new stimulation paradigm in patients who are already undergoing spinal cord stimulation surgery. The investigators will also study whether there are changes in electroencephalography (brain waves) associated with this new stimulation paradigm. The investigators hope to learn whether CR stimulation can provide equivalent or better pain relief with reduced energy requirements. They also hope to learn whether there are changes in brain function with effective CR stimulation compared to conventional stimulation. This study will be testing a specific stimulation paradigm in people who have already consented to have spinal cord stimulation performed for treatment of their chronic pain.
The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility of using information extracted from physiologic signals to automatically adjust stimulation in patients undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS).
The aim of this study will be to investigate the effect of an opioid-free anesthesia regimen with a mixture of dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in the same syringe versus fentanyl analgesia in elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery
The aim of this study will be to compare the effects of morphine versus ketamine when they are used as adjuvants to the local anesthetic in paravertebral nerve blocks performed with the aid of ultrasound. Furthermore, a group of local anesthetic without an adjuvant, will also be compared to the two groups
Neuropathic pain is described as a "pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system". It is thus often a chronic affection, as a difficult-to-treat condition. As such, there is growing proportion of patients with inefficient pain relief. The prevalence of chronic neuropathic pain has been estimated from 6.9 to 10% in the general population and represents a heavy financial burden for the health care systems. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to alleviate severe intractable neuropathic pain (SCS is a reversible treatment option which leads to improve pain relief and quality of life Using conventional SCS, the prerequisite to target any pain relief is to obtain an appropriate coverage of the painful area with induced paresthesia. Despite its effectiveness, conventional SCS has some limitations (Selectivity, Energy consumption …) and in order to address these limitations and challenges, medical devices and neuromodulation industries have developed the Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) stimulation. DRG stimulation appears to be a promising technology that can be proposed to patients with chronic neuropathic pain for several reasons: DRG stimulation has shown promising results in pathologies generating focal pain with more selectively than SCS, lead localization appeared to be less discriminative than SCS. Consequently, DRG seems more stable and efficient to relief pain with lower energy consumption than SCS (therapy can be delivered with very low amplitude compared to SCS). Last but not least, Abbott technology has moved forward to Burst stimulation a couple of years ago and validated this new way of delivering electrical stimulation through several major publications. To our knowledge, applying new waveforms to DRG has not been yet validated. This will represent a fantastic opportunity to refine the design of the next generation of Internal Pulse Generators (IPGs). To date, the baseline study comparing DRG stimulation to SCS is the ACCURATE study. This is a high quality prospective, multicenter, randomized comparative trial conducted in 152 patients implanted with either SCS or DRG stimulation system. Although ACCURATE study is well designed, it has some limitations. To bridge this gap, the investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a crossover design, where SCS and DRG stimulation will be used within patient in three conditions: (i) SCS alone, (ii) DRG stimulation alone (DRGS), (iii) combination of SCS and DRGS (DUAL). Our goal will be to compare SCS vs DRGS vs DUAL therapies in order to establish the superiority of DRG stimulation over SCS in a crossover design, assess the added value of hybrid stimulation (DUAL) over the separate standalone stimulation types, compare the different cortical pathways involved in both techniques, by functional imaging, incl. MRI, analyze energy consumption by optimizing neural targeting. assess the added value of applying Burst on these different targets, after a 3-month follow-up and to reinforce the perception of neurostimulation techniques through the pain community, as the investigators will demonstrate their benefits on pain relief, functional capacity and quality of life, with objectives measures and a randomized design. This study represents a unique opportunity to boost the rationale of SCS/DRGS since each arm of treatment will be blinded for the patient and the implanter.
Fabry Disease (FD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder due to the absence or deficiency of hydrolase α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) activity in lysosomes. This dysfunction results in progressive accumulation of glycosphingolipids in a wide variety of cells, resulting in major organ system damage. Patients with Fabry disease can suffer from neuropathic pain, since lysosomal accumulation affects small unmyelinated nerve fibers. Neuropathic pain is one of the prominent and debilitating symptoms significantly interfering with life quality in FD patients. Current treatment of Fabry patients with neuropathic pain is deficient, as they respond poorly to a conventional pain therapy, often require a high-dose opioids treatment and presentation to the Emergency Department. Sativex® has been shown to be a successful treatment option in neuropathic pain of different origin with minimal neuropsychological influence: in multiple sclerosis (MS), chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain and other. It contains Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) and has recently been licensed in Switzerland for treatment of neuropathic chronic pain in MS. Sativex® is an oral spray.