View clinical trials related to Pain Measurement.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) with an Er:YAG laser on the palatal donor site following subepithelial connective tissue graft (SECTG) surgery. Patient-centred outcomes and wound healing will be compared between a control group, who receives no laser treatment, and the test group receiving PBM therapy. It is hypothesized that laser stimulation will have a beneficial effect on the patient's post-operative experience as well as the healing of the tissues.
The present study is a multicenter, explorative, qualitative study. The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate to which extent the collection of data with regard to pain caused by illness or treatment can be optimized using health technology solutions. For this evaluation semi-structured qualitative interviews with 8-10 patients will be conducted. Secondary variables are the evaluation of the patients' pain experience and the general patients' willingness to collect data with regard to pain by using technological devices themselves or with support of healthcare professionals.
Pain is common following surgery in children. Currently, no recent review of pain profiles at home has been performed on pediatric population in France following general surgery in children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the duration and severity of pain felt by children using a mobile phone application. All children operated in the different centers and leaving home will be included in the study. Children's pain scores will be measured using PPMP-SF scale (Postoperative Pain Measure for Parents Short Form). Data on prescribed and administered analgesia, nausea-vomiting, behavioral problems and parental satisfaction will be collected. The expected results are an inventory's objective observation of postoperative pain profiles at home following the different pediatric surgeries in France. The study will also highlight the different risk factors of postoperative pain (type of surgery, parental causes, reasons due to the child, medical causes).
This is a retrospective, observational study which will utilise the Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre's Tissue Bank to provide samples for IENFD testing in those who have undergone mastectomy surgery for breast cancer. The investigators shall identify all those patients in the Tissue Bank database who have undergone mastectomy surgery for breast cancer. The investigators shall consult the patient's electronic health record, and general practitioner if required, to ascertain whether the patient has died, been diagnosed with cognitive impairment or a psychotic disorder, or receiving ongoing oncological treatment which would exclude them from the study. The investigators shall also exclude all those patients who received surgery within the last year as we intend to elucidate the presence of pain in the immediate post-operartive period up to 12 months post-operatively. Having identified these patients the investigators shall contact them via post with a pack containing an information document, a consent form and questionnaires. As this is an observational study we shall contact all of the identified patients who meet the inclusion criteria with the aim of recruiting as many as possible. The investigators would anticipate a high response rate as has been the experience with previous questionnaire studies of breast cancer patients. Once a signed consent form has been returned the patient's tissue sample would undergo IENFD testing. Their questionnaire responses will allow participants to be split into two groups based upon whether they experience CPSP or not. Blinding of this grouping will take place so that those undertaking the IENFD testing are unaware of the patient's questionnaire responses. Statistical analysis of the two group's IEFD results and questionnaire responses will then be undertaken with the null hypothesis that the pre-operative IENFD at the site of surgery does not predict or correlate with CPSP.
Fighting against the pain caused by the disease or by the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for children is a daily and essential concern of health care in the pediatric sector. The quantification of pain is needed to effectively adjust analgesic therapy while limiting the side effects of treatment. Nowadays many scales are validated for children, but they are based on one-off measures and hetero assessments are often subjective and dependent on many factors including the presence of staff to children's sides. Recent developments in the analysis of the cardiac signal in real time under the influence of autonomic control, have led to the development of a new painful stress quantification index. A monitor has recently been developed and provides an index of nociception and analgesia (ANI index). The validation of this nociception index has not been validated for pediatric care in a sector where particular attention is given to control pain. The main purpose of this study is to show the consistency of the index compared to a validated pain scale and used routinely in non-sedated children hospitalized in pediatric intensive care units. The caregiver will have the opportunity to fine tune the effective treatment.
Background and aim: Postoperative pain is an adverse effect of oral surgeries and may therefore be prevented or minimized. This study compares the efficacy of preemptive ibuprofen and dexamethasone protocols in pain prevention and control after surgical implant placement. Methods: For this prospective, double-masked, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, 117 dental implants were placed. The groups received three different protocols 1 hour before surgery: 1. 600 mg ibuprofen (and another 600 mg dose 6 hours after the first dose); 2. 4 mg dexamethasone (and another 4 mg 6 hours after the first dose) or 3. placebo. Rescue medication (1000 mg acetaminophen) was given to each patient who was instructed to take it if necessary. Pain intensity was evaluated by a 101-point numeric rate scale and visual analogue scale, additionally discomfort was evaluated using a four-point verbal rate scale, hourly for the first 8 hours after surgery and three times a day on the following 3 days.
Study patients are given a hand held device to track pain post surgery.
Reflux is common, especially after large meals. In general, this can do no harm. However, if reflux occurs often and causes troublesome symptoms and or complications, it is called gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Long exposure to gastric acid causes the mucosa of the esophagus to loose its integrity, which is thought to lead to the symptom of heartburn. Several food products can also impair the esophageal mucosa integrity and thereby influence reflux symptoms. One of these products is capsaicin, the pungent ingredient of red peppers. Use of capsaicin often leads to worsening of complaints in patients with GERD and can cause symptoms in healthy volunteers, possibly due to its effect on the mucosal integrity. In this study the investigators want to investigate the effect of capsaicin infusion on mucosal integrity. The investigators will evaluate mucosal impedance and the histology of the esophageal mucosa. In addition, the investigators also aim to assess the involvement of the TRPV1 receptor by evaluating the possible release of neuropeptides in the esophageal mucosa.
The aim of this study is to compare early and long term efficacy of lumbar radiofrequency nucleoplasty and targeted disc decompression in patients with lumbar radiculopathy who failed previous conventional therapy. Medical records of 37 patients undergoing targeted disc decompression, 36 patients undergoing lumbar radiofrequency nucleoplasty were retrospectively examined.Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Functional Rating Index, Backache index, Oswestry Lumbar Back Pain Disability Index, Rolland-Morris Lumbar Back Pain Questionnaire scales were used before treatment and 1,6,12 months after the procedure. North American Spine Society Satisfaction Scale was used at 12th month after the procedure.
To determine whether the rate of wound complications differs based on method of closure of skin incision (staples vs. suture) after cesarean delivery.