Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01301872
Other study ID # 201012005RB
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received February 18, 2011
Last updated December 26, 2012
Start date December 2012
Est. completion date December 2013

Study information

Verified date November 2012
Source National Taiwan University Hospital
Contact Jih-Shuin Jerng, MD,PhD
Phone 0972651075
Email jsjerng@ntu.edu.tw
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Taiwan: Department of Health
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

During the past two decades, there current concept has evolved significantly that ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) may not only impose a direct mechanical stress and subsequent injury to the lungs, but may also induce local as well as systemic inflammation responses, generally referred as biotrauma.1 Patients with ARDS often die of severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiorgan dysfunction2 rather than refractory hypoxemia. Ranieri et al found that patients with less severe ARDS, i.e., a lung injury score of 2.5 or less, receiving ventilation with lung protective strategy involving low tidal volume (7.5 mL/kg PBW) and high PEEP could attenuate the pulmonary and systemic cytokine response compared with conventional ventilation with high tidal volume.3 Stuber et al found an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines in the lung and plasma of patients with ARDS within 1 hour after switching the patients from a protective to non-protective ventilator strategy.4 The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) was recently identified as a marker of injury to the alveolar type I epithelial cells5. Clinical studies showed that the plasma level of RAGE was associated with severity of lung injury and clinical outcome, and low tidal volume strategy ventilation accelerated the decline in plasma RAGE levels. These results suggest plasma RAGE level might be a reliable biomarker of alveolar epithelial injury in acute lung injury and may associated with ventilator induced lung injury6. Although, current approach to mechanical ventilation of a patient with ARDS emphasizes the use of lower tidal volumes with lower plateau pressures to avoid causing lung overdistension and ventilator associated lung injury (VILI)7; however, in the real world, some studies showed that strictly reduction of tidal volume to 6ml/kg PBW was modest in modern time, and was noticed only in patients with greater lung injury scores8. The benefit of VT strictly reduction to 6ml/kgPBW and its effect on VILI in patients with less severe ARDS whose Pplat are already below 30 cmH2O are controversy9. One of the possible solutions is to look at the biomarkers of injury to alveolar epithelial cells. Of these potentially promising markers, the receptor for advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) is of great interest.

We hypothesize that a strategy with strict low tidal volume in less severe ARDS and ALI patients with good compliance may be beneficial to this patient population. Therefore, we wish to propose a prospective single-center study to investigate the effect of mechanical ventilation strategy on the plasma level of RAGE in patients with less severe ARDS and acute lung injury.


Description:

During the past two decades, there current concept has evolved significantly that ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) may not only impose a direct mechanical stress and subsequent injury to the lungs, but may also induce local as well as systemic inflammation responses, generally referred as biotrauma.1 Patients with ARDS often die of severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiorgan dysfunction2 rather than refractory hypoxemia. Ranieri et al found that patients with less severe ARDS, i.e., a lung injury score of 2.5 or less, receiving ventilation with lung protective strategy involving low tidal volume (7.5 mL/kg PBW) and high PEEP could attenuate the pulmonary and systemic cytokine response compared with conventional ventilation with high tidal volume.3 Stuber et al found an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines in the lung and plasma of patients with ARDS within 1 hour after switching the patients from a protective to non-protective ventilator strategy.4 The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) was recently identified as a marker of injury to the alveolar type I epithelial cells5. Clinical studies showed that the plasma level of RAGE was associated with severity of lung injury and clinical outcome, and low tidal volume strategy ventilation accelerated the decline in plasma RAGE levels. These results suggest plasma RAGE level might be a reliable biomarker of alveolar epithelial injury in acute lung injury and may associated with ventilator induced lung injury6. Although, current approach to mechanical ventilation of a patient with ARDS emphasizes the use of lower tidal volumes with lower plateau pressures to avoid causing lung overdistension and ventilator associated lung injury (VILI)7; however, in the real world, some studies showed that strictly reduction of tidal volume to 6ml/kg PBW was modest in modern time, and was noticed only in patients with greater lung injury scores8. The benefit of VT strictly reduction to 6ml/kgPBW and its effect on VILI in patients with less severe ARDS whose Pplat are already below 30 cmH2O are controversy9. One of the possible solutions is to look at the biomarkers of injury to alveolar epithelial cells. Of these potentially promising markers, the receptor for advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) is of great interest.

We hypothesize that a strategy with strict low tidal volume in less severe ARDS and ALI patients with good compliance may be beneficial to this patient population. Therefore, we will to propose a prospective single-center study to investigate the effect of mechanical ventilation strategy on the plasma level of RAGE in patients with less severe ARDS and acute lung injury.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date December 2013
Est. primary completion date December 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- All intubated and mechanically ventilated patients who meet the criteria of American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) criteria for ALI/ ARDS:

Acute onset of illness Bilateral (patchy, diffuse, or homogeneous) infiltrates consistent with pulmonary edema PaO2/FiO2 <= 300 (corrected for altitude): (P/F <300 for ALI and P/F <200 for ARDS) No clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1. Age <18 years 2. Enrolled in other clinical trials 3. Had confirmed alternative diagnoses that would have different clinical course than ARDS/ALI, e.g., diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, vasculitis, interstitial pneumonitis, etc.

4. Congestive heart failure related pulmonary edema 5. Acute myocardial infarction 6. Pregnancy 7. Patients with definite contraindication to the use of low-tidal volume ventilation, e.g., increased intracranial pressure, tricyclic antidepressant overdose, etc.

8. The patient who meets inclusion criteria initially but rapidly improved within 24 hours of diagnosis of ARDS/ALI

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
check biomarker :RAGE
We will check RAGE for all patients who have ARDS included in our study

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Taiwan University Hospital

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary the effect of mechanical ventilation strategy on the plasma level of RAGE in patients with less severe ARDS and acute lung injury. 7 days No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04384445 - Zofin (Organicell Flow) for Patients With COVID-19 Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05535543 - Change in the Phase III Slope of the Volumetric Capnography by Prone Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Completed NCT04695392 - Restore Resilience in Critically Ill Children N/A
Terminated NCT04972318 - Two Different Ventilatory Strategies in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to Community-acquired Pneumonia N/A
Completed NCT04534569 - Expert Panel Statement for the Respiratory Management of COVID-19 Related Acute Respiratory Failure (C-ARF)
Completed NCT04078984 - Driving Pressure as a Predictor of Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Time on Post-ARDS Patients in Pressure Support Ventilation.
Completed NCT04451291 - Study of Decidual Stromal Cells to Treat COVID-19 Respiratory Failure N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06254313 - The Role of Cxcr4Hi neutrOPhils in InflueNza
Not yet recruiting NCT04798716 - The Use of Exosomes for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome or Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Caused by COVID-19 Phase 1/Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT04909879 - Study of Allogeneic Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Non-COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT02881385 - Effects on Respiratory Patterns and Patient-ventilator Synchrony Using Pressure Support Ventilation N/A
Terminated NCT02867228 - Noninvasive Estimation of Work of Breathing N/A
Completed NCT02545621 - A Role for RAGE/TXNIP/Inflammasome Axis in Alveolar Macrophage Activation During ARDS (RIAMA): a Proof-of-concept Clinical Study
Completed NCT02232841 - Electrical Impedance Imaging of Patients on Mechanical Ventilation N/A
Withdrawn NCT02253667 - Palliative Use of High-flow Oxygen Nasal Cannula in End-of-life Lung Disease Patients N/A
Completed NCT01504893 - Very Low Tidal Volume vs Conventional Ventilatory Strategy for One-lung Ventilation in Thoracic Anesthesia N/A
Completed NCT02889770 - Dead Space Monitoring With Volumetric Capnography in ARDS Patients N/A
Withdrawn NCT01927237 - Pulmonary Vascular Effects of Respiratory Rate & Carbon Dioxide N/A
Completed NCT01680783 - Non-Invasive Ventilation Via a Helmet Device for Patients Respiratory Failure N/A
Completed NCT02814994 - Respiratory System Compliance Guided VT in Moderate to Severe ARDS Patients N/A