Clinical Trials Logo

Other clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Other.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06087731 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Thyroid Associated Ophthalmopathy

Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab for TAO

Start date: September 23, 2023
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab treating Thyroid Associated Ophthalmopathy.

NCT ID: NCT06068153 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

AMG510 (Sotorasib) Plus Lenvatinib as Second-line Treatment in Patients With KRASG12C Mutant, Metastatic NSCLC

AMBER
Start date: March 31, 2024
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

AMBER is a multicentre, single-arm phase II trial. The protocol treatment consists of of sotorasib plus lenvatinib, as a second-line treatment. The primary objective of the trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of sotorasib plus lenvatinib, in terms of objective response rate, for patients with KRASG12C-mutant, metastatic NSCLC.

NCT ID: NCT06057636 Withdrawn - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Hypnosis for Pain in Black Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study

Start date: September 8, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare two hypnotic interventions for Black women with advanced cancer pain in preparation for a well-powered phase III study. The investigators plan to enroll 30 adult Black women with advanced cancer pain in a 2-arm pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary aim will be to evaluate the feasibility of conducting the 2-arm clinical trial. It is hypothesized that at least 75% of participants in both study arms will complete study requirements. The secondary aims will be to evaluate the participant's experience with the intervention and to determine the effect size of the intervention on pain severity.

NCT ID: NCT06032247 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Bilateral Versus Unilateral Strength Training After ACLR

BUST
Start date: August 31, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

After rehabilitation completion, there remains large deficiencies between the operative (OP) and non-operative (NOP) limbs in lower-limb outcomes (e.g., size, strength, and function) and these deficits can persist for years. Therefore, further specialized training protocols, such as the ones in the present study, are required to determine if these deficits can be lessened. The proposed project will evaluate the effect of 8-weeks of single-leg and double-leg lower-body resistance training on musculoskeletal function in individuals with a previous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in a randomized control trial. The study will recruit 30-40 males and females between 18-35 years of age that have undergone a previous ACLR. Participants will be randomized to either the single-leg/unilateral (UL) or double-leg/bilateral (BL) training groups. Training will occur three times per week for 8-weeks. The UL group will participate in exercises such as split squats, single-leg deadlifts, or single-leg squats. The BL group will utilize exercises such as double-leg squats, conventional deadlifts, and leg presses. One week prior to (PRE) and one week after (POST) the training program, all participants will undergo a testing battery. Musculoskeletal ultrasound will measure quadriceps and hamstrings muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA), fascicle length (FL), and pennation angle (PA) of both OP and NOP limbs. Strength will be assessed through maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) for the quadriceps and hamstrings, and one-repetition maximum tests for single-leg leg extensions, leg curls, and leg press. Lower-limb function will be assessed through single-leg and double-leg jumps on a dual force plate system for jump height, impulse, rate of force development, and peak force. Data will be analyzed via separate mixed-factorial analyses of variance for the within-subjects factor of leg (OP vs. NOP) and time (PRE vs. POST) and the between-subjects factor of biological sex (male vs. female) and group (UL vs. BL). Post-hoc analyses will include lower-order ANOVAs and t-tests as pairwise comparisons when significance is detected. Significance will be established at p≤0.05. The results of this study will assist practitioners, coaches, sport scientists, and most importantly, the athletes, in the development of post-rehabilitative strength training protocols designed to reduce between-limb discrepancies.

NCT ID: NCT06006286 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Study Evaluating Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Plus ADI-PEG 20 in Patients With Locally Advanced / Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Start date: August 8, 2023
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

To learn about the safety and tolerability of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and ADI-PEG 20 when given in combination to patients with locally advanced or metastatic liver cancer

NCT ID: NCT05999357 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Brain Metastases, Adult

JDQ443 for KRAS G12C NSCLC Brain Metastases

STRIDER
Start date: April 15, 2024
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this phase II clinical trial is to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of JDQ443, a KRAS G12C inhibitor in patients with KRAS G12C+ NSCLC and brain metastases (cohort A: asymptomatic, untreated brain metastases, cohort B: asymptomatic, treated brain metastases). The main question it aims to answer is to evaluate the intracranial efficacy, according to RANO-BM criteria, in patients with asymptomatic and untreated brain metastases. Participants will receive JDQ443 200 mg BID until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.

NCT ID: NCT05980507 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

An Open Label, Single-arm Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of ICI201 Infusion in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Start date: October 9, 2023
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

An open label, single-arm clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ICI201 infusion in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

NCT ID: NCT05967286 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Olaparib and Alpelisib for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer, A ComboMATCH Treatment Trial

Start date: October 23, 2023
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This phase II ComboMATCH treatment trial studies the effect of adding a drug called BYL719 (alpelisib) to the usual treatment of olaparib in patients with breast cancer that has spread from where it first started (breast) to other places in the body (metastatic). Olaparib is an inhibitor of PARP, an enzyme that helps repair DNA when it becomes damaged. Blocking PARP may help keep tumor cells from repairing their damaged DNA, causing them to die. PARP inhibitors are a type of targeted therapy. Alpelisib blocks certain proteins, which may help keep tumor cells from growing and may kill them. It is a type of kinase inhibitor. Giving alpelisib in combination with olaparib may be able to improve treatment results for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

NCT ID: NCT05966233 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Recurrent

R-DHAP vs POLA-R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Transplant as First Salvage Treatment in Patient With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

FIL_POLARDHAP
Start date: January 2024
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Prospective, multicenter, open label, phase II randomized clinical trial in DLBCL patients relapsed or refractory to first line R-chemo, aged 18-70 years and candidate to autologous transplant. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to received 4 cycles of R-DHAP or R-DHAP plus Polatuzumab Vedotin as induction treatment plus autologous transplant.

NCT ID: NCT05962073 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Comparison Physiological Effects According to Preoxygenation Method Using EIT

PreoxyEIT
Start date: August 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hypoxemia during endotracheal intubation is one of this procedure's most frequent and severe complications, which can lead to cardiac arrest and other adverse outcomes. Although various studies have been conducted to ensure the safety of endotracheal intubation, most of them have focused on the physiological changes during the procedure in surgical settings, where general anesthesia is administered to healthy subjects. However, the physiological characteristics of critically ill patients who require endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) may differ from those of healthy subjects. When comparing the oxygen saturation-dissociation curve of healthy subjects and critically ill patients, the latter show a steeper decline in oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 90% when hypoxemia occurs. Clinically, it is difficult to maintain or recover oxygen saturation when it drops. Therefore, preoxygenation is also essential for critically ill patients with a relatively small lung reservoir, as it can help maintain higher and longer oxygen saturation during endotracheal intubation. For this reason, apneic oxygenation was proposed in the 1950s as a method of oxygen delivery during general anesthesia for surgery, and clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applying it to critically ill patients in the ICU have been conducted since 20 years ago. In an observational study by Macamn et al., the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of a bag valve mask was 1, while that of a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was 5.75 and that of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was 0.10 when different preoxygenation methods were used. n FLORARI 2, a large-scale clinical RCT comparing NIV and HFNC with or without apneic oxygenation, NIV was significantly more effective than HFNC in reducing severe hypoxemia. Based on these previous studies, the investigators can infer that supplying oxygen during laryngoscopy is not very effective in preventing hypoxemia in critically ill patients. However, there is no guideline on which device to choose for preoxygenation in the ICU, and NIV or HFNC are selected according to the operator's preference. This is because few studies have examined the physiological effects of these devices on patients. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aim to compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events of NIV and HFNC as preoxygenation methods for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure and to evaluate their physiological effects using electrical impedance tomography.