Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00208468
Other study ID # CT99/02
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 3
First received September 13, 2005
Last updated October 6, 2016
Start date February 2000
Est. completion date March 2015

Study information

Verified date October 2016
Source DePuy International
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Austria: Federal Ministry for Health and Women
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This post-market clinical follow-up study was designed to compare hip replacement outcomes of the European Hip against 3 controls (Omniflex, Zweymuller, and Spotorno), however Omniflex did not end up being used. The first patient had surgery on February 18, 2000 and the final patient had surgery on September 2, 2005. There were 317 subjects consented but only 301 had hip replacement surgery (subjects received: 220 European hips, 33 Zweymuller, and 48 Spotorno). The study took place at three sites. Each site used their standard device as the control. The Austrian site enrolled 69 European hips and 33 Zweymuller hips. 92 European hips and 48 Spotorno hips were enrolled in Germany. Finally, the site in Italy enrolled 59 European hips. Although the study protocol intended collecting DEXA and RSA outcomes, the data collected by the sites did not include these outcomes.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 317
Est. completion date March 2015
Est. primary completion date June 2005
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 55 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

i) Administrative - The subject is able to understand the study, is willing to give voluntary, written, informed consent, will co-operate with assessment procedures and is geographically able to comply with the post-operative follow-up regime.

ii) Age - The subject's age is between 18 and 75 years inclusive.

iii) Sex - Male or female subjects may be recruited to the study.

iv) Diagnosis -Subjects must be undergoing primary THR surgery for non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, post-traumatic arthritis, fractured neck of femur and non-union of fractured neck of femur, SUFE or Perthes disease.

v) Suitability - Subjects who in the opinion of the Investigator are considered to be suitable for treatment with the devices involved in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

i) Subjects undergoing revision procedure to the operative hip.

ii) Subjects who have had a previous femoral osteotomy to the operative hip.

iii) Subjects who have a history of active sepsis in the joint.

iv) Subjects who have been diagnosed with primary or secondary carcinomas in the last five years (excluding basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma).

v) Subjects with any condition which may, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with the total hip replacement's survival or outcome, e.g. Paget's disease, Charcot's disease.

vi) Subjects with psycho-social disorders which, in the opinion of the Investigator would limit rehabilitation.

vii) Subject's whose weight is > 100kg.

viii) Subjects with femoral head necrosis on the non-operated side (RSA and DEXA subjects only).

ix) Subjects who have a fracture of the femur > 6 months old (RSA and DEXA subjects only).

x) Subjects diagnosed as having ankylosing spondylitis (RSA and DEXA subjects only)

xi) Subjects with a known history of poor compliance to medical treatment.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Intervention

Device:
European Hip
A cementless femoral component for use in total hip replacement
Zweymüller
A cementless femoral component for use in total hip replacement
CLS Spotorno
A cementless femoral component for use in total hip replacement

Locations

Country Name City State
Austria Univ. Kliniken Graz
Germany Univesitätsklinikum Jena Eisenberg
Italy InstitutoAzienda Gaetano Pini Milan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
DePuy International

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Austria,  Germany,  Italy, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary To Compare Survivorship estimates between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices through the 2 year follow-up period. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis estimates the proportion of a population that will survive past a certain time avoiding a certain event. In this study, the event is removal of any component for any reason, also known as revision for any reason. 2yrs post-surgery Yes
Secondary Implant survivorship at 5 and 10 years. This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 and 10 year data was not collected. 5 & 10 year post-op Yes
Secondary To Compare Harris Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. The Harris Hip score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip. 3 Months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Harris Hip scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices The Harris Hip score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip. 6 Months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Harris Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices The Harris Hip score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip. 12 months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Harris Hip scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices The Harris Hip Score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip. 24 months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Harris Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 and 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary To Compare Oxford Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 patient recorded outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates pain and function of the affected hip. 3 months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Oxford Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 patient recorded outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates pain and function of the affected hip. 6 months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Oxford Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 patient recorded outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates pain and function of the affected hip. 12 months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Oxford Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices he Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 patient recorded outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates pain and function of the affected hip. 24 months post-op No
Secondary To Compare Oxford Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5& 10 years post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Femur: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 3 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Femur: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 6 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Femur: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 12 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Femur: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 24 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Femur: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 3 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 6 month post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 12 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Width of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones). 24 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post-market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 year post-op No
Secondary Migration - Femoral: To compare Progressive Migration incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 3 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Femoral: To compare Progressive Migration incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 6 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Femoral: To compare Progressive Migration incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 12 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Femoral: To compare Progressive Migration incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 24 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Femoral: To compare Progressive Migration incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary Migration - Acetabular: To compare Progressive Migration between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 3 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Acetabular: To compare Progressive Migration between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 6 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Acetabular: To compare Progressive Migration between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 12 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Acetabular: To compare Progressive Migration between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position 24 months post-op No
Secondary Migration - Acetabular: To compare Progressive Migration between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Femur: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 3 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Femur: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position 6 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Femur: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 12 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Femur: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 24 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Femur: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 3 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position. 6 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position 12 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Component moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position 24 months post-op No
Secondary Progressive Osteolysis - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary Trochanteric Non-Union - Femur: To compare Trochanteric Non-union incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Trochanter portion of the bone does not heal correctly to proximal portion of the femoral shaft. Typically, after 6 months the lack of correct healing is classified as a 'non-union'. 3 months post-op No
Secondary Trochanteric Non-Union - Femur: To compare Trochanteric Non-union incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Trochanter portion of the bone does not heal correctly to proximal portion of the femoral shaft. Typically, after 6 months the lack of correct healing is classified as a 'non-union' 6 months post-op No
Secondary Trochanteric Non-Union - Femur: To compare Trochanteric Non-union incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Trochanter portion of the bone does not heal correctly to proximal portion of the femoral shaft. Typically, after 6 months the lack of correct healing is classified as a 'non-union'. 12 months post-op No
Secondary Trochanteric Non-Union - Femur: To compare Trochanteric Non-union incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Trochanter portion of the bone does not heal correctly to proximal portion of the femoral shaft. Typically, after 6 months the lack of correct healing is classified as a 'non-union'. 24 months post-op No
Secondary Trochanteric Non-Union - Femur: To compare Trochanteric Non-union incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary To compare Femoral Stem Orientation between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Alignment is classified into 1 of 3 categories - Neutral, Varus (distal tip of stem lateral to mid-line of femur), or Valgus (distal tip of stem medial to mid-line of femur). 3 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Femoral Stem Orientation between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Alignment is classified into 1 of 3 categories - Neutral, Varus (distal tip of stem lateral to mid-line of femur), or Valgus (distal tip of stem medial to mid-line of femur). 6 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Femoral Stem Orientation between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Alignment is classified into 1 of 3 categories - Neutral, Varus (distal tip of stem lateral to mid-line of femur), or Valgus (distal tip of stem medial to mid-line of femur). 12 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Femoral Stem Orientation between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Alignment is classified into 1 of 3 categories - Neutral, Varus (distal tip of stem lateral to mid-line of femur), or Valgus (distal tip of stem medial to mid-line of femur). 24 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Femoral Stem Orientation between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary To compare Brooker Ectopic Ossification between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Presented by Brooker in JBJS 55a: 1629-1632 (1973). Soft tissue or bone bridging causing immobilization in severe cases; categorized into classes I to IV with I being islands of bone around soft tissue, and IV representing ankylosis of the hip. 3 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Brooker Ectopic Ossification between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Presented by Brooker in JBJS 55a: 1629-1632 (1973). Soft tissue or bone bridging causing immobilization in severe cases; categorized into classes I to IV with I being islands of bone around soft tissue, and IV representing ankylosis of the hip. 6 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Brooker Ectopic Ossification between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Presented by Brooker in JBJS 55a: 1629-1632 (1973). Soft tissue or bone bridging causing immobilization in severe cases; categorized into classes I to IV with I being islands of bone around soft tissue, and IV representing ankylosis of the hip. 12 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Brooker Ectopic Ossification between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. Presented by Brooker in JBJS 55a: 1629-1632 (1973). Soft tissue or bone bridging causing immobilization in severe cases; categorized into classes I to IV with I being islands of bone around soft tissue, and IV representing ankylosis of the hip. 24 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Brooker Ectopic Ossification between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices. This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
Secondary To compare Acetabular Socket Wear between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Linear wear, measured in millimeters (mm) of the femoral head into the acetabular socket. 3 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Acetabular Socket Wear between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Linear wear, measured in millimeters (mm) of the femoral head into the acetabular socket. 6 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Acetabular Socket Wear between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Linear wear, measured in millimeters (mm) of the femoral head into the acetabular socket 12 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Acetabular Socket Wear between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices Linear wear, measured in millimeters (mm) of the femoral head into the acetabular socket. 24 months post-op No
Secondary To compare Acetabular Socket Wear between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices This post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 & 10 year data was not collected 5 & 10 years post-op No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04657926 - A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT02536833 - A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects Phase 2
Completed NCT03014037 - Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration N/A
Recruiting NCT05937542 - A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
Completed NCT03644615 - A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT06061367 - Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
Withdrawn NCT04976972 - A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation N/A
Completed NCT05496205 - A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT03850665 - Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach N/A
Completed NCT02826902 - Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT04402502 - Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT02923700 - Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT04564053 - Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT05070871 - A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05036174 - Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT02666443 - Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks N/A
Recruiting NCT02912429 - Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02723929 - Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
Withdrawn NCT02921594 - Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties N/A
Terminated NCT02820766 - Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting N/A