View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Filter by:Goal: Comparison of the effects of genicular nerve block with usg and physical therapy on pain, physical function for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Material and Methods:102 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee with Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) class 2 or 3 were included in the study.Patients were randomized to two groups, first being injected a total of 6 mL of lidocaine plus 40 mg of triamcinolone (TA) at 3 separate target sites: the superior lateral, superior medial, and inferior medial genicular nerves with exercise treatment and second being ten sessions of hotpack as a surface warmer, TENS as a analgezic current, ultrasound therapy as a deep warmer with exercise treatment.For the first group, the ultrasound we used: 12 MHz linear transducer. (Logic E9-GE, USA).The transducer was first placed parallel to the long bone shaft and moved up or down to identify the epicondyle of the long bone. The genicular arteries were identified near the periosteal areas, which are the junctions of the epicondyle and the shafts of the femur and tibia, and confirmed by color Doppler ultrasound.Accordingly, GNB target points should be next to each genicular artery because the superior lateral, superior medial, and inferior medial genicular artery traveled along each genicular nerve. , Visual Analogue Scale for pain(VAS) was primer outcome measurement, Western Ontorio and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and six minute walk tests were seconder outcome measurements of the study applied before, after (two weeks) and 12th weeks of treatment. Primer endpoint of the study is decrease at least 40% in VAS values at 2nd week, second endpoint is the improvement in the womac and 6-minute walk test observed in the 2nd week continues until the 12th week.
Knee osteoarthritis is common joint disorder in older adults. The prevalence of osteoarthritis is increasing in the elderly population and due to obesity.The aim of this study to compare improvement in balance between BRACE and proprioceptive training in knee osteoarthritis and to compare mobility level between proprioceptive and BRACE in knee osteoarthritis
Background:Knee osteoarthritis is more common in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus, however it is not known whether this effect is caused by diabetes itself or concominant abdominal obesity. Objectives:The aim of this study is to determine whether type-2 diabetes itself, independent of abdominal obesity, is a risk factor for femoral cartilage, knee osteoarthritis and poor quality of life. Design:A cross-sectional design. Settings:Training and research hospital in Turkey. Patients and Methods:Female patients was enrolled in this study and divided into two groups: according to presence or absence of diabetes. Later, both the patients with and without abdominal obesity was divided into two groups according the presence of diabetes. Main Outcome measures:Clinical parameters were visual analog-scale, gait speed and short form-36. Knee radiographs were evaluated according to Kellgren Lawrance-Scale. And ultrasonography parameters were the measurements of distal femoral cartilage thickness. Sample size:126
Higher aerobic capacity before surgery, as indicated during submaximal exercise testing by the oxygen uptake (VO2) at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT), is assumed to be prognostic for a better and faster postoperative recovery in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard to measure aerobic capacity; however, it is unclear whether it is feasible to perform CPET using cycle ergometry in patients with knee OA prior to TKA surgery. The hypothesis is that performing CPET is feasible and participants will meet the feasibility criteria for success. The primary objective of this cross-sectional feasibility study is to investigate the feasibility of CPET in patients with knee OA three to six weeks prior to TKA surgery in three domains: a) recruitment rate of participants who are representative of the target study population; b) reaching the VAT during CPET; and c) acceptability and suitability. The secondary objective is to investigate aerobic capacity of the study population and to compare values with normative values. The study population consists of patients with knee OA scheduled for primary unilateral TKA surgery. Feasibility of CPET will be assessed against five criteria: 1) recruitment rate ≥20%; 2) CPET performance rate ≥90%; 3) ≥90% of participants reached the VAT; 4) no serious adverse events; and 5) ≥80% of participants had a positive attitude towards CPET. Aerobic capacity is determined by the VO2 at the VAT and the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES). CPET is considered a safe procedure. Participants perform the CPET instead of a walking test following the standard preoperative screening and complete a questionnaire to examine their experiences. The investigator will contact the participants one week after the CPET to inquire whether they have developed any complaints afterwards. Benefit from participation is that all patients objectively get insight in their preoperative aerobic capacity.
This study will evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of MEDI7352 in healthy participants.
Knee osteoarthritis has been ranked 11th highest contributor to non-fatal burdens in the world. Many research studies have discussed the relationship of hip muscle with knee joint stating that impaired hip strength can be a reason for knee pain. Furthermore, mobilization has been shown to be helpful in reducing pain, increasing range of motion and physical function in Osteoarthritis. Despite the evidence, there are very few studies that actually conducted clinical trials to test the effectiveness of mobilizations and strengthening of hip muscles in knee Osteoarthritis. Therefore our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of hip joint mobilizations and strength training in knee osteoarthritis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of hip joint mobilizations and strengthening exercises, on pain, physical function and dynamic balance in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using Visual analog scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and four square step test. METHODOLOGY: A randomized control trial will be conducted on 66 subjects with knee osteoarthritis and age 50 years will be enrolled in this study after screening by referring consultants. This study will be carried out at Physiotherapy OPD of DUHS, Civil hospital Karachi and Rabia Moon Memorial Institute of Neurosciences Trust. Subjects will be assessed at baseline and after 18 sessions using Visual analog scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and square step test for pain, physical functioning and dynamic balance respectively. The subjects will be allocated into three groups through simple random sampling. Group A (joint mobilization group) will receive hip mobilization techniques, hip strengthening exercises along with the best available knee exercises while group B (hip muscles strengthening group) will receive hip-strengthening exercises with the best available knee exercises. Group C (knee strengthening group) will be receiving the best available knee treatment including exercises only. Patients will receive a total of 18 sessions, 5 treatment sessions per week for four successive weeks. The data will be entered and analyzed using SPPS version 21. Repeated mean one way ANOVA will be applied to measure VAS and KOOS scores within the group, for pairwise comparison between groups, Tukey's test will be applied. Chi-square will be applied for FSST scoring. A P-Value less than 0.5 will be considered significant.
The aim of the present investigation is to evaluate the efficacy of Mangoselect®, a mangosteen extract, and of a formulation containing Mangoselect®, in subjects suffering from activity/exercise-induced knee joint pain/discomfort, during a 12-week supplementation period. Subjective discomfort improvement will be assessed with both WOMAC questionnaire and pain Visual Analogic Scale (VAS); functional joints features, quality of life, and inflammatory markers, will also be assessed. Finally, long lasting benefits will additionally be evaluated 4 weeks after the end of the supplementation period. The design of the study is double-blind, randomized, multi-arm, parallel and placebo controlled.
PMCF study to assess the effectiveness and safety of BENART in the treatment of symptomatic knee OA in a real-life clinical setting when used according to the instructions for use.
A prospective study was performed on 90 patients were included and categorized into mild (30 cases, moderate (30 cases) and severe (30 cases) knee OA. Three intra-articular (I.A) injections of PRP, 2 weeks a part, were received. Pain score and MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) were assessed. Serial synovial fluid cytokines assays in the form of Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), were performed using commercially available ELISA assay kits. The assays were performed pre-injection (S1), two weeks from the 1st I.A injection and two weeks from the 2nd I.A injection (S3) for all included patients.
Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease affecting the joint in a comprehensive and progressive manner. It leads to increasing disability. The recommendations of recent years favor the non-pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis including regular physical activity, therapeutic education and weight loss Osteoarthritis population has a low level of physical activity due to a lack of information, motivation and false beliefs related to physical activity and kinesiophobia (fear of movement) A preliminary qualitative study (ARTHe1) evaluating the barriers and levers of the use of an e-health therapeutic education application in patients with osteoarthritis was carried out in order to guide the development of the ARTHe application. The objective of this study is to have the application tested on a panel of patients in order to assess the benefits of using the application in terms of adherence to the practice of physical activity but also in clinical terms on function and pain, and the satisfaction of the patient