View clinical trials related to Operative Time.
Filter by:Hysterectomy, the most commonly performed gynecological operation, can be carried out through various methods using a wide array of instruments and energy techniques. Minimally invasive procedures such as robotic or laparoscopic approaches are linked to lower perioperative complications and quicker recovery when compared to abdominal hysterectomy. Furthermore, recent advancements in surgical tools and methodologies have facilitated endoscopic surgeries. Uterine manipulation plays a crucial role in laparoscopic hysterectomy by facilitating bladder dissection, positioning the ureters, and exposing the anterior and posterior vaginal fornices. It also prevents pneumoperitoneum loss by closing off the vaginal space. Despite these apparent benefits, there is no existing report comparing different types of uterine manipulators. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the Vcare and SecuFix uterine manipulators used in laparoscopic hysterectomy based on operative time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and subjective performance.
With the development of stapler devices, various methods of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy were evoluated. Which stapler is more advantageous has not been determined. At present, the most commonly used is linear stapler or Circular stapler in esophagojejunostomy. However, there is still a lack of reliable evidence for the selection of the two staplers. The purpose of this study is to explore the advantages of linear staper versus circular stapler in esophagojejunostomy for patients with gastric cancer who underwent total gastrectomy.
The investigators propose prospectively evaluating if adding separate sutures to the angles of the vaginal cuff before running barbed suture reduces the incidence of patient's perception of bleeding after surgery.
Despite the high numbers of cesareans being performed, scientific evidence behind which surgical techniques are best remains uncertain. Our objective is to determine if subcuticular absorbable staples improve operative time and wound cosmetics.
Randomized controlled trial in which two different laparoscopic systems: standard 2D and Olympus VISERA Elite II 3D will be compared in terms of laparoscopic skills, length of surgery, intraoperative complications and surgeon's fatigue in a group of senior surgeons and senior residents will be measured when performing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Hemorrhoidectomy is the treatment of choice for grade 3 and 4th degree hemorrhoids. Various surgical technique has been used to improve the outcome of the procedures performed in respect to operative time ,post operative pain and hospital stay. This study compares the conventional closed technique with harmonic scalpel technique which is a device regulated with ultrasonic waves to perform the procedure with minimal postoperative complication as well as decreasing the prolong stay in hospital.
A comparison study was performed between Ligasure and Milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy to find out the outcome between these two techniques in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids.This advance vessel sealing device is used to seal the pedicle of the vessel and does not burn the surrounding tissues , so the outcome was monitored in terms of operative time, post operative pain pain, duration of wound healing in 3 weeks and return to normal activities
The investigators are studying the duration it takes surgeons to complete their respective surgical cases. The hospital hopes to improve the overall operating room scheduling accuracy from this project.
laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopy for polycystic ovary syndrome in infertile women undergoing ovarian drilling as regards successful surgical procedure with less side effects
Background: Laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is associated with a significant learning curve. We report the results of a systematic training programme from a high volume bariatric center measuring the outcome by comparing the results with data from a consecutive series of 1000 fast track LRYGB. Method: Using a stepwise training programme the RY gastric bypass operation was divided into an upper and lower procedure and subdivided into 11 well defined steps. A laparoscopic surgeon without experience in upper GI surgery was mentored by an experienced bariatric surgeon. During 6 months full time fellowship 300 operations were performed. Results: The trainee surgeon performed 61 upper procedures, and 121 lower procedures in which the mentor surgeon did the other part of the operation. In 110 patients the trainee performed both procedures. Two percent had peri-operative complications compared to 1% of 1000 patients. All were repaired and had an uneventful recovery. Two percent had postoperative complications < 30 days compared to 2.8% in the clinic. In the trainees series there were no leaks compared to 1% in 1000 patients. Operative time was 56/55/70 min for operation 0-100/100-200/200-300 compared with an average of 47 minutes registered in the clinic. Concerning time to discharge there was no difference between patients operated by the trainee and the standard of the clinic. Conclusion: Using a systematic training program in laparoscopic RY gastric bypass surgery eliminates morbidity of the learning curve without affecting the volume.