View clinical trials related to Oncology.
Filter by:The main aim of this study was to evaluate clinically the effect of a combination between oral vitamin D and oral zinc in comparison to conventional therapy in prevention of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in Assiut University Hospitals.
In the first-year project of this study, oncology nurses have reported experiencing massive stress, insufficient communication ability, and the need for communication-related training. 70% of them had moderate or higher severity of workload, fatigue, and psychological distress (at the measure point) before being provided with Basic Remote Psychological Support Course (BRPSC). A month after BRPSC, some oncology nurses have indicated/affirmed the benefits of undergoing the comprehensive psycho oncology education training courses. Thus, the second- and third-year continuation projects are focused on the development and delivery of Multi-Psychological Empowerment Courses (MPEC) for oncology nurses
Developments in the healthcare sector in general, and in oncology in particular, mean that patients are increasingly autonomous. Outpatient treatment raises the issue of home monitoring. One of the solutions proposed by the 2014-2019 Cancer Plan is the development of telemedicine. Several programmes have been set up in the medical oncology department at Hôpital Mondor, to make patient care more secure and improve the management of undesirable effects of treatment for patients undergoing intravenous (I.V.) chemotherapy or oral anti-cancer treatments. The preliminary study on the use of the digital solution Onco'nect demonstrated the feasibility of using a dematerialised tool for real-time monitoring and management of chemotherapy-induced adverse events in cancer patients undergoing outpatient treatment. The tool was used to help AP-HP institution deal with the crisis linked to the COVID epidemic. Once it had been configured, Onco'nect was deployed to all institution's hospital groups to ensure that infected patients could remain at home, and that patients hospitalised with symptomatic COVID infection could return home. Hypothesis: The digital solution Onco'nect would improve patient compliance and could reduce the occurrence and improve the management of unexpected adverse events. Primary objective: In terms of clinical evaluation, the primary objective is to assess the effect of using the Onco'nect solution for ambulatory oncology follow-up on reducing the rate of occurrence at 6 months follow-up of unexpected and unwanted chemo-induced adverse events. The solution is already on the market and has been integrated (or is in the process of being integrated) into the care systems of the participating AP-HP establishments. The aim of the project is to evaluate its use in routine care and measure the occurrence and management of unexpected and unwanted chemo-induced adverse events in outpatients treated for cancer. This observational study of care pathway, using retrospective data, aims to include 480 patients in a 18 months period. Three periods of interest will be considered in this before-and-after study - Onco'nect pre-deployment (12 months): period covering the year prior to the actual implementation of the solution in each centre; patients receiving I.V. chemotherapy during the first 6 months of the period will be included, in order to assess follow-up at 6 months. - Onco'nect deployment: this period corresponds to the implementation of the solution in the centre's care pathway. Deployment includes interoperability with other operating systems and setting up the collection interfaces for the user. - Post-deployment (12 months): period covering the year following the implementation of the solution within the centre (installation, interoperability and configuration validated); patients receiving I.V. chemotherapy during the first 6 months of the period will be included, in order to be able to evaluate the 6-month follow-up.
Capillary-venous paired data collection.
The goal of this randomized, open and controlled supportive care study is to see if we can reduce the burden on the caregiver by offering the caregiver systematic and regular support from the nurse (APN, nurse coordinator in French health care organisations) compared to a support focused on the patient. At the same time, we will also evaluate the impact of this personalised support for the caregiver on their anxiety and quality of life. Participants will caregivers of a patient who started a line (any line) of systemic treatment for a solid tumour since less than 3 months or in an active palliative situation since less than 1 month. Researchers will compare 2 groups : a group where caregivers benefit from specific nursing support and a group of caregivers with no specific nursing support. The specific support includes 3 mandatory on-site nursing consultations with the patient's caregiver and interviews once a month with a nurse either by phone, on-site consultation or teleconsultation.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of the mHealth app in improving symptoms experienced by children in the early stage of cancer survivorship, including physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, and pain interference, and at improving the quality of life (QoL) of the children's primary caregivers The main question it aims to answer is whether survivors who receive the symptom management mHealth app intervention will report improved symptoms, i.e., improved physical function; lower levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and fatigue; better peer relationships; and lower pain interference 3 months after starting the intervention. Additionally, we hypothesized that the primary caregivers (either the mother or father) would report an improved QoL 3 months after starting the intervention. Participants in the intervention group will use the mHealth app for 12 weeks with personalised nurse support via interactive communication technologies. They are required to complete questionnaires at baseline (during medical follow-up), 1, 2, and 3 months (via electronic-based systems in the mobile app) Besides, semi-structured interviews and will be conducted to examine the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the intervention.
Introduction Patients with advanced cancer often experience high levels of debilitating pain and pain-related psychological distress. Although there is increasing evidence that non-pharmacological strategies are needed to treat their pain, pharmacologic modalities remain the preferred strategy. Guided imagery is a form of focused relaxation that helps create harmony between the mind and body and has been shown to significantly improve cancer pain. This study presents Virtual Reality Assisted Guided Imagery (VRAGI) as an alternative pain treatment modality. The investigators of this study will conduct a randomized control trial to test its efficacy, feasibility, and safety in the home setting, for patients with advanced cancer. Methods and Analysis The study will recruit 80 participants from Prisma Health, a tertiary level health care center based in Greenville, South Carolina, USA using a stringent set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. The prospective 6-week, 2x2 randomized controlled trial will randomize participants to four groups: (1) VRAGI, (2) Laptop Assisted Guided Imagery (AGI), (3) VR (no guided imagery or other audio), and (4) laptop (no guided imagery or other audio). Participants allocated to VR groups will be trained to use a head-mounted display (HMD) that immerses them in 3D audio-video content. The non-VR group will use a laptop displaying 2D video content. Content includes relaxing natural scenes across three calendar seasons (spring, summer, fall). Investigators will collect measures pre, during, and post intervention including patient reported outcomes (PROs) of pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue. Additionally, investigators will assess the feasibility, acceptability and safety of VRAGI use in a home setting. Trial Registration Number #Pro00114598 Strengths and Limitations - This study uses a novel design that combines the use of immersive Virtual Reality (VR) technology with guided imagery processes to treat chronic pain in advanced cancer patients. - Investigators propose a reproducible intervention that can be self-administered in a home setting, thus eliminating the need for trained personnel, transportation modalities, or healthcare facilities. - VR content will be preloaded onto HMDs, thus eliminating the need for access to the internet and decreasing the variability of the intervention. - Investigators will collect patient reported outcomes (PROs) on pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and opioid use, but not continuous user feedback or biofeedback. - This study focuses on patients < 65 years of age with advanced cancer. This allows the study to focus on a large group of patients but may limit the overall generalizability of the findings.
A consensus study using nominal group technique is planned to develop recommendations for a comfort intervention package for radiotherapy with patients and therapeutic radiographers. This includes completed work from a systematic literature review (Prospero 59688) of comfort interventions applicable to radiotherapy and qualitative interviews (NCT03984435) with patients and therapeutic radiographers exploring comfort management in radiotherapy.
Prospective randomized prospective interventional study with 40 consecutive patients for whom surgical treatment for PH was indicated and who are in postoperative follow-up with the Oncology Surgery group of the Department of Digestive Tract Surgery and Coloproctology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo . The free and informed consent form will be applied to the patient by the researchers in two copies of equal content and after any doubts related to the research are resolved, the patient will sign the copies together with the researcher. At any time, the patient may opt out of the study. The contacts of the researchers and the institution will be fully available to the research subject to resolve doubts and for any eventuality that may occur.
Transfusional practices evolved significantly over the last decades, but there are still important controversies regarding triggers that should be adopted in different clinical scenarios. Most international guidelines recommend using a hemoglobin (Hb) level around 7,0-8,0g/dL as the value to prompt a transfusion of red blood cell concentrates (RBC). Critical care patients usually are in a hyperdynamic state, working with an elevated cardiac output and compromised organ function. In these patients, the dependency on the arterial content of oxygen is greater, making lower Hb levels more associated with organ disfunction and compromised homeostasis. With this study the investigators hope to help clinicians to make decisions regarding transfusion of RBCs in critical surgical patients, establishing a transfusional trigger, without exposing patients to unnecessary additional risks, in the scenario involving patients with cancer, in post-operative care. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional trial, with the aim of evaluating the impact of restrictive versus liberal transfusional strategy on mortality and severe clinical complications in post-operative oncologic critically ill patients. The primary outcome is mortality in 30 days. The interventions consist in transfusion of RBCs according to the allocation to a liberal or restrictive transfusional strategy. In the restrictive strategy arm patients will receive transfusion of RBCs if the Hb falls to a level equal to or below 7,0g/dL. In the liberal strategy arm patients will receive transfusions if Hb level is below or equal to 9,0g/dL. In both arms patients should receive only one unit of RBC per time, with measurement of Hb level after three hours to evaluate the need for additional units. The strategy should be maintained during intensive care unit (ICU) stay for a maximum of 90 days. In case of a permanence in the ICU for a period longer than 90 days, or if the patient is discharged from the ICU, the transfusional support will be determined by the assisting physicians, independently of the allocated study arm. If the patient returns to the ICU during the 90 days of randomization, then he should go back to receiving transfusions according to the liberal or restrictive strategy in use previously in the ICU.