View clinical trials related to Oesophageal Cancer.
Filter by:This project aims to establish the safety and efficacy of treating patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer or gastric cancer, using an endoscopic electroporation system (EndoVE) to facilitate direct chemotherapy tumour absorption.
Feasibility study of a 12-week multidisciplinary telehealth rehabilitation programme for survivors of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer
The overall aim of this pilot study is to prospectively monitor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression dynamics in vivo, during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) in rectal and esophageal cancer by a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging approach.
The aim of this research is to evaluate the quality of life of patients over 75 years of age undergoing palliative chemotherapy for digestive cancer. It is a non-interventional study that evaluates the quality of life before and after a cycle of chemotherapy with a composite criterion including: a standardized questionnaire "Cancer specific quality of Life questionnaire" (QLQC30), an assessment of autonomy by "Activity of daily living" questionnaire (ADL), and the number of days of hospitalization.
This is an open, single arm, multicenter phase 2 trial in which BO-112 will be administered intratumorally in combination with intravenous pembrolizumab in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal, gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers. The objective is to reverse the primary resistance that a subgroup of patients from these tumors having microsatellite stability present to the PD-1 inhibitors. Treatment will be administered every 3 weeks, with the exception of the first cycle, in which BO-112 will be also administered on D8, for up to 2 years. The primary objective is overall response rate based on RECIST 1.1 and safety, specifically referred to treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with severity ≥ Grade 3 related to the study treatment (NCI-CTCAE v 5.0). The secondary endpoints include other efficacy endpoints (duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival at 6 months, all based on RECIST 1.1, and overall response rate based on a specific tumor assessment criteria to evaluate the response to immunotherapies, IRECIST) and safety, in this case considering the number and proportion of subjects with treatment TEAEs (any grade) . In addition, the changes in the tumor microenvironment induced by the injection of BO-112 will be also evaluated as exploratory endpoints.
PLATON (Platform for Analyzing Targetable Mutations) is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study with biobanking. In a first approach PLATON's pilot-study assesses genomic profiling in gastrointestinal cancer therapy and the frequencies of targetable mutations including Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) and Microsatellite Instability Status (MSI), performing Next-generation deep sequencing (NGS) using the Foundation Medicine assays on tumor specimen and EDTA-whole blood samples. The Study Protocol does not define any further medical intervention or evaluate the efficacy or safety of the treatment decision made by the investigator. Another important objective of PLATON's pilot project is to evaluate whether and how many patients are treated based on their genomic profiles.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of treatment with bintrafusp alfa combined with definitive chemoradiation (carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.
Malnutrition and loss of muscle mass frequently occur in patients undergoing chemotherapy and can negatively effect therapy outcome. Especially patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract are often affected by malnutrition. Therefore, this study aims to examine changes in nutritional status of patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract during chemotherapy. Findings of this study will help to improve nutritional treatment of patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Accurate evaluation of activity status is an important part of the assessment of people with cancer. Clinician assessments currently used are valuable but have limitations; in particular, assessment only occurs when the patient attends clinic and is often subjective. Activity trackers, such as FitBits, give the opportunity to objectively assess activity status continuously, independent of clinic visits. Previous studies have shown that a reduction in 1000 steps while receiving cancer treatment is associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation but it is not known if using information from activity trackers to allow early intervention is feasible or if it can reduce admission to hospital and improve outcomes. The investigators propose a prospective feasibility study in people with advanced lung cancer or upper gastrointestinal cancers who are starting a new line of systemic anti-cancer therapy. Participants will receive a FitBit, which is a commercially available wearable activity tracker for the duration of their treatment or 4 months (whichever is shorter). Step counts will be monitored and a reduction in daily steps of >1000 from baseline will trigger contact by the study team and an ambulatory review. Participants will not receive treatment within the context of the study.
The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of the incremental shuttle walk test on rates of hospital acquired pneumonia for patients undergoing oesophagectomy.