Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Change in HbA1c% at 6 months |
Hemoglobin A1c levels (%) are measured using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months. |
|
Primary |
Change in HbA1c% at 12 months |
Hemoglobin A1c levels (%) are measured using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months. |
|
Secondary |
Percent weight loss at 6 months |
Body weight is measured using standard methods with the patient wearing light clothing |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Percent weight loss at 12 months |
Body weight is measured using standard methods with the patient wearing light clothing |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in waist circumference at 6 months |
Waist circumference is measured using standard methods with an inelastic tape |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in waist circumference at 12 months |
Waist circumference is measured using standard methods with an inelastic tape |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months |
Systolic blood pressure is measured using standard clinical methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in systolic blood pressure at 12 months |
Systolic blood pressure is measured using standard clinical methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in diastolic blood pressure at 6 months |
Diastolic blood pressure is measured using standard clinical methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in diastolic blood pressure at 12 months |
Diastolic blood pressure is measured using standard clinical methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in total cholesterol at 6 months |
Total cholesterol is assayed using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in total cholesterol at 12 months |
Total cholesterol is assayed using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 months |
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol is assayed using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 months |
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol is assayed using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 months |
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is estimated using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 months |
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is estimated using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in triglycerides at 6 months |
Triglycerides are assayed using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in triglycerides at 12 months |
Triglycerides are assayed using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in physical activity at 6 months |
Physical activity is assessed with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. A valid and reliable instrument from the World Health Organization that measures physical activity intensity, duration, and frequency in three domains: occupational physical activity, transport-related physical activity, and physical activity during discretionary or leisure time. It also captures sedentary time. There are 16 questions. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in physical activity at 12 months |
Physical activity is assessed with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. A valid and reliable instrument from the World Health Organization that measures physical activity intensity, duration, and frequency in three domains: occupational physical activity, transport-related physical activity, and physical activity during discretionary or leisure time. It also captures sedentary time. There are 16 questions. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in dietary intake at 6 months |
Dietary Intake will be assessed using DietID (www.DietID.com). DietID harnesses diet quality photo navigation technology to identify participant's dietary intake by showing a series of images that participants select based on what reflects their current dietary pattern. Once a pattern is identified, DietID provides nutrient intake data and a Healthy Eating Index 2015 score. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in dietary intake at 12 months |
Dietary Intake will be assessed using DietID (www.DietID.com). DietID harnesses diet quality photo navigation technology to identify participant's dietary intake by showing a series of images that participants select based on what reflects their current dietary pattern. Once a pattern is identified, DietID provides nutrient intake data and a Healthy Eating Index 2015 score. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in perceived stress at 6 months |
Perceived stress is measured using the Perceived Stress Scale, a 10-item questionnaire that measures the extent to which a participant's life is unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloading. It was designed for use in older adolescents and adults, and is considered to have adequate internal reliability and construct validity. Each question asks about how the participant has felt or thought in the past month and uses a 5-point Likert scale (0=never, 4=very often). Scores are calculated by summing responses and higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in perceived stress at 12 months |
Perceived stress is measured using the Perceived Stress Scale, a 10-item questionnaire that measures the extent to which a participant's life is unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloading. It was designed for use in older adolescents and adults, and is considered to have adequate internal reliability and construct validity. Each question asks about how the participant has felt or thought in the past month and uses a 5-point Likert scale (0=never, 4=very often). Scores are calculated by summing responses and higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in diabetes distress at 6 months |
The Diabetes Distress Scale contains 17 total items with 4 subscales: Emotional Burden (items 1, 3, 8, 11, 14), Physician-related distress (items 2, 4, 9, 15), Regimen-related distress (items 5, 6, 10, 12, 16), and Interpersonal distress (7, 13, 17). The total score is calculated by taking an average of participant responses to all 17 items. In the same manner, each subscale can have its own score by taking an average of subscale specific participant responses. A mean item score of 3 or higher is considered moderate distress and a level of distress worthy of clinical attention. The Diabetes Distress scale has been tested for reliability and validity in US based populations and abroad. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in diabetes distress at 12 months |
The Diabetes Distress Scale contains 17 total items with 4 subscales: Emotional Burden (items 1, 3, 8, 11, 14), Physician-related distress (items 2, 4, 9, 15), Regimen-related distress (items 5, 6, 10, 12, 16), and Interpersonal distress (7, 13, 17). The total score is calculated by taking an average of participant responses to all 17 items. In the same manner, each subscale can have its own score by taking an average of subscale specific participant responses. A mean item score of 3 or higher is considered moderate distress and a level of distress worthy of clinical attention. The Diabetes Distress scale has been tested for reliability and validity in US based populations and abroad. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in quality of life at 6 months |
The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite is a validated self-report measure for an individual's perception of how their weight affects their day-to-day life. Respondents rate the degree to which their weight affects them on 31 items using a five-point Likert scale (1, never true; 2, rarely true; 3, sometimes true; 4, usually true; 5, always true). The IWQOL-Lite consists of 5 scales (physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work). |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in quality of life at 12 months |
The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite is a validated self-report measure for an individual's perception of how their weight affects their day-to-day life. Respondents rate the degree to which their weight affects them on 31 items using a five-point Likert scale (1, never true; 2, rarely true; 3, sometimes true; 4, usually true; 5, always true). The IWQOL-Lite consists of 5 scales (physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work). |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in well-being at 6 months |
Well-being will be measured using the World Health Organization-5 Well-being Index, which consists of five statements, which respondents rate, in relation to the past two weeks, using a six-point Likert scale (0, at no time; 1, some of the time; 2, less than half of the time; 3, more than half of the time; 4, most of the time; 5, all of the time). The total raw score ranges from 0 to 25, and is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worse imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in well-being at 12 months |
Well-being will be measured using the World Health Organization-5 Well-being Index, which consists of five statements, which respondents rate, in relation to the past two weeks, using a six-point Likert scale (0, at no time; 1, some of the time; 2, less than half of the time; 3, more than half of the time; 4, most of the time; 5, all of the time). The total raw score ranges from 0 to 25, and is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worse imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in habit strength at 6 months |
Habit strength will be assessed with the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index, a 4-item measure that that is reliable, correlates highly with existing measures, and is sensitive to effects that characterize habits. The 4-items assess whether Behavior X is something... "I do automatically", "I do without having to consciously remember", "I do without thinking", and "I start doing before I realize I'm doing it". Items are scored using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in habit strength at 12 months |
Habit strength will be assessed with the Self-Report Behavioral Automaticity Index, a 4-item measure that that is reliable, correlates highly with existing measures, and is sensitive to effects that characterize habits. The 4-items assess whether Behavior X is something... "I do automatically", "I do without having to consciously remember", "I do without thinking", and "I start doing before I realize I'm doing it". Items are scored using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in emotional eating at 6 months |
Emotional eating will be measured with the Palatable Eating Motives Scale- Coping Subscale, which measures intentionally using palatable food to cope with negative feelings and has demonstrated reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. The coping subscale additionally demonstrated incremental validity with BMI. The coping subscale consists of 4 questions with response options Almost Never/Never to Almost always/Always. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in emotional eating at 12 months |
Emotional eating will be measured with the Palatable Eating Motives Scale- Coping Subscale, which measures intentionally using palatable food to cope with negative feelings and has demonstrated reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. The coping subscale additionally demonstrated incremental validity with BMI. The coping subscale consists of 4 questions with response options Almost Never/Never to Almost always/Always. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in hunger at 6 months |
Hunger will be measured using the Hunger Visual Analogue Scale, which is a reliable measure for appetite research. The Hunger Visual Analogue Scale asks "How hungry did you feel over the past week" and is composed of a line with words anchored at each end describing the extremes (Not at all hungry, Extremely hungry). Participants are asked to make a mark on the line corresponding to their feelings and quantification of the measurement is done by measuring the distance from the left end of the mark. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in hunger at 12 months |
Hunger will be measured using the Hunger Visual Analogue Scale, which is a reliable measure for appetite research. The Hunger Visual Analogue Scale asks "How hungry did you feel over the past week" and is composed of a line with words anchored at each end describing the extremes (Not at all hungry, Extremely hungry). Participants are asked to make a mark on the line corresponding to their feelings and quantification of the measurement is done by measuring the distance from the left end of the mark. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in diabetes medications at 6 months |
The number of diabetes medications is summed at each time point |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in diabetes medications at 12 months |
The number of diabetes medications is summed at each time point |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion of patents achieving an HbA1c% <=6.5% at 6 months |
Hemoglobin A1c levels (%) are measured using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion of patents achieving an HbA1c% <=6.5% at 12 months |
Hemoglobin A1c levels (%) are measured using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion of patents achieving an HbA1c% <=7% at 6 months |
Hemoglobin A1c levels (%) are measured using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in proportion of patents achieving an HbA1c% <=7% at 12 months |
Hemoglobin A1c levels (%) are measured using standard laboratory methods |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in food cravings at 6 months |
Food cravings will be assessed using the Food Cravings Inventory, a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess the subjective experience of food craving across 33 different foods. The measure consists of 5 empirically-derived factors: high fats, sweets, carbohydrates, starches, fast food fats, & fruits and vegetables. The questionnaire is scaled in a frequency format, assessing the frequency with which an individual experiences a craving for a particular food. All items are scored in the following manner: Never = 1, Rarely = 2, Sometimes = 3, Often = 4, & Always=5. Fat = Average of items 3,4,7,11,17,23,31,32. Sweet=Average of items 1,9,15,19,20,27,28,30. Carb=Average of items 6,10,14,16,22,25,26,33. FFF=Average of items 2,8,13,24. FCI-Fr/Veg=Average of items 5,12,18,21,29. Total=Average of all 33 items. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in food cravings at 12 months |
Food cravings will be assessed using the Food Cravings Inventory, a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess the subjective experience of food craving across 33 different foods. The measure consists of 5 empirically-derived factors: high fats, sweets, carbohydrates, starches, fast food fats, & fruits and vegetables. The questionnaire is scaled in a frequency format, assessing the frequency with which an individual experiences a craving for a particular food. All items are scored in the following manner: Never = 1, Rarely = 2, Sometimes = 3, Often = 4, & Always=5. Fat = Average of items 3,4,7,11,17,23,31,32. Sweet=Average of items 1,9,15,19,20,27,28,30. Carb=Average of items 6,10,14,16,22,25,26,33. FFF=Average of items 2,8,13,24. FCI-Fr/Veg=Average of items 5,12,18,21,29. Total=Average of all 33 items. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in self compassion at 6 months |
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Self-Compassion Scale, a 26-item measure of self-compassion that is psychometrically valid and theoretically coherent. The scale consists of six subscales: self-kindness, self-judgement, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identified. Subscales are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. A total self-compassion score can be obtained by reverse scoring the negative subscale items (self-judgement, isolation, and over-identification) and computing a grand mean of all six subscale means. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in self compassion at 12 months |
Self-compassion will be assessed using the Self-Compassion Scale, a 26-item measure of self-compassion that is psychometrically valid and theoretically coherent. The scale consists of six subscales: self-kindness, self-judgement, common humanity, isolation, mindfulness, and over-identified. Subscales are computed by calculating the mean of subscale item responses. A total self-compassion score can be obtained by reverse scoring the negative subscale items (self-judgement, isolation, and over-identification) and computing a grand mean of all six subscale means. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in restraint/disinhibition at 6 months |
The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire- Restraint and Disinhibition subscales measures cognitive restraint of eating and disinhibition. The scales contain 37 items and have been tested for reliability and validity. Higher scores indicate greater levels of restraint or disinhibition. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in restraint/disinhibition at 12 months |
The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire- Restraint and Disinhibition subscales measures cognitive restraint of eating and disinhibition. The scales contain 37 items and have been tested for reliability and validity. Higher scores indicate greater levels of restraint or disinhibition. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in body appreciation at 6 months |
The Body Appreciation Scale measures individuals acceptance of, favorable opinions toward, and respect for their bodies. The scale demonstrates internal consistency, convergent validity, incremental validity, and discriminant validity. Measurement invariance upheld across sexes and US sample types (college vs. community samples). There are 10 items, each assessed on a scale from 1-never to 5-always. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in body appreciation at 12 months |
The Body Appreciation Scale measures individuals acceptance of, favorable opinions toward, and respect for their bodies. The scale demonstrates internal consistency, convergent validity, incremental validity, and discriminant validity. Measurement invariance upheld across sexes and US sample types (college vs. community samples). There are 10 items, each assessed on a scale from 1-never to 5-always. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in weight bias at 6 months |
The Weight Bias Internalization Scale has 13 items and responses are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (strongly disagree -strongly agree). Responses provide insight on the participant's internalized beliefs and feelings regarding their weight. There are two subscales: Weight-Related Distress (7 items; 7-13; Cronbach's alpha =0.910) and Weight-Related Self-Devaluation (6 items; 1-6; Cronbach's alpha =0.763). The scale has been tested for validity in people with overweight and obesity and the two factor model demonstrated good to excellent fit with the data. Scores are calculated by taking an average of the response values. Questions 1,2,4,5, should be reverse scored before calculating the average. |
Baseline and 6 months |
|
Secondary |
Change in weight bias at 12 months |
The Weight Bias Internalization Scale has 13 items and responses are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (strongly disagree -strongly agree). Responses provide insight on the participant's internalized beliefs and feelings regarding their weight. There are two subscales: Weight-Related Distress (7 items; 7-13; Cronbach's alpha =0.910) and Weight-Related Self-Devaluation (6 items; 1-6; Cronbach's alpha =0.763). The scale has been tested for validity in people with overweight and obesity and the two factor model demonstrated good to excellent fit with the data. Scores are calculated by taking an average of the response values. Questions 1,2,4,5, should be reverse scored before calculating the average. |
Baseline and 12 months |
|