Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06181279
Other study ID # DP guided PEEP
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 1, 2024
Est. completion date December 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Qianfoshan Hospital
Contact yong t Sun, Ph.D
Phone 18660795201
Email sunyongtao1979@163.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Atelectasis is a common complication in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, particularly in obese patients. Postoperative atelectasis could last for more than 24h and contribute to a variety of other complications, including hypoxemia and pneumonia. We plan to conduct a single-center, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing bariatric surgery to test the hypothesis that driving pressure guided PEEP could reduce the postoperative atelectasis.


Description:

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a strategy that helps to keep alveoli open during surgery and to prevent postoperative atelectasis. A fixed PEEP without considering the respiratory mechanics in individual patients, however, is not optimal. Individualized PEEP therefore has been increasingly studied, and has been shown to improve oxygenation in both nonobese and obese patients. Studies have shown that the occurrence and prognosis of PPCs are significantly associated with high driving pressure (DP), but not with VT and PEEP. Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP is expected to be a novel perioperative lung protection strategy. Consequently, the main aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP ventilation strategy on postoperative pulmonary atelectasis in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 52
Est. completion date December 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age 18 to 60 years old; - Body mass index (BMI) = 40 kg/m2; - ASA classification I to III; - Signing the informed consent form for this clinical study; Exclusion Criteria: - Respiratory infection within 4 weeks; severe respiratory system diseases; history of pulmonary and/or thoracic surgery; neuromuscular dysfunction; - Serious cardiac, renal or haematopoietic diseases; - Contraindications to PEEP;

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Individualized PEEP group
Individualized PEEP group: Recruitment Maneuver (RM) is performed first. In pressure control mode, PEEP and airway plateau pressure are increased to 20 cmH2O and 35 cmH2O at a rate of 5 cmH2O every 30s, and driving pressure is maintained at 15 cmH2O throughout. Subsequently, in volume-controlled ventilation mode, PEEP decreases from 20 cmH2O to 4 cmH2O at gradient of 2 cmH2O, and each PEEP level is maintained for 30s. The PEEP corresponding to the lowest driving pressure is the individualized PEEP we need. If multiple PEEP levels showed the same lowest driving pressure, the lowest PEEP value as the individualized PEEP. The above procedures are performed three times during the surgery (5 minutes after intubation,5 minutes after the beginning of pneumoperitoneum, and 5 minutes after the end of pneumoperitoneum).
Fixed PEEP group
After the same RM, PEEP is fixed at 8 cmH2O.

Locations

Country Name City State
China Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital affiliated of Shandong First Medical University Jinan Shandong

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Yongtao Sun

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Incidence of postoperative pulmonary atelectasis The primary outcome of this study is postoperative atelectasis measured by lung ultrasound. Each hemithorax is divided into 6 regions using 3 longitudinal lines (parasternal, anterior and posterior axillary)and 2 axial lines (one above the diaphragm and the other 1 cm above the nipples). The 12 lung regions were scanned sequentially from right to left, cranial to caudal and anterior to posterior. Each region is assessed using a 2-dimen-sional view with the probe placed parallel to the ribs. It distinguishes four progressive steps of loss of aeration according to the artifacts visualized in a scan: score 0, normal aeration (A-lines or no more than two B-lines); score 1, moderate loss of aeration (three or more well-spaced B-lines); score 2, severe loss of aeration(coalescent B-lines); and score 3, complete loss of aeration(tissue-like pattern). We define atelectasis to be significant if any region had a lung consolidation score of =2. After 30 minutes of extubation
Secondary Postoperative pulmonary ultrasound score Each hemithorax is divided into 6 regions using 3 longitudinal lines (parasternal, anterior and posterior axillary)and 2 axial lines (one above the diaphragm and the other 1 cm above the nipples). The 12 lung regions were scanned sequentially from right to left, cranial to caudal and anterior to posterior. Each region is assessed using a 2-dimen-sional view with the probe placed parallel to the ribs. It distinguishes four progressive steps of loss of aeration according to the artifacts visualized in a scan: score 0, normal aeration (A-lines or no more than two B-lines); score 1, moderate loss of aeration (three or more well-spaced B-lines); score 2, severe loss of aeration(coalescent B-lines); and score 3, complete loss of aeration(tissue-like pattern). We define atelectasis to be significant if any region had a lung consolidation score of =2. Based upon the LUS scoring system, each area is scored from 0-3, so a minimum zero or maximum 36 score is possible. After 30 minutes of extubation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04517591 - Reducing Sedentary Time in Bariatric: The Take a STAND for Health Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04583683 - Effects of Very Low Calorie Diet vs Metabolic Surgery on Weight Loss and Obesity Comorbidities N/A
Completed NCT01550601 - Impact of the Preservation of the Gastric Antrum in the Technique of Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of the Morbid Obesity N/A
Completed NCT03638843 - Endoscopic Gastric Mucosal Devitalization (GMD) as a Primary Obesity Therapy - Part 2 N/A
Recruiting NCT05917795 - Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty With Endomina® for the Treatment of Obesity in Kidney Transplant Candidates N/A
Completed NCT03339791 - Sleeve Versus Bypass in Older Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05711758 - Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Antral Myotomy as a Novel Weight Loss Procedure
Not yet recruiting NCT04209842 - Effectiveness Gastric Balloon in Obese Adolescents N/A
Recruiting NCT03100292 - Korean OBEsity Surgical Treatment Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04357119 - Common Limb Length in One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass N/A
Completed NCT03210207 - Gastric Plication in Mexican Patients N/A
Completed NCT02590406 - EPO2-A: Evaluation of Pre-Oxygenation in Morbid Obesity: Effect of Position and Positive Pressure Ventilation N/A
Completed NCT01840020 - BAR-trial: Bioavailability of Ethanol Following Bariatric Surgery
Completed NCT01183975 - Swedish Adjustable Gastric Banding Observational Cohort Study N/A
Completed NCT03872024 - Performances Evaluation of New FibroScan Probes Dedicated to Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Terminated NCT05993169 - Body Composition Optimization Intervention RCT N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05974995 - Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Obese Patients With Early Endometrial Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT05554016 - The UFO (Ultra Processed Foods in Obesity) Project
Completed NCT05519423 - Investigation of the Effectiveness of Whatsapp-Based Physical Activity Incentive Program in Morbidly Obese Individuals N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05499949 - The Franciscus Obesity NASH Study