View clinical trials related to Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The primary objectives of this study are to compare the risk of major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism (SE) events among oral anticoagulant (OAC)-naïve non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients initiating OAC warfarin or apixaban or dabigatran or rivaroxaban treatment.
In a population of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) in routine clinical practice in England, this study will describe patients treated with each OAC, and to estimate and compare event rates of treatment discontinuation, bleeding, and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) across OAC treatments.
This study mainly evaluated the feasibility and safety of a kind of Left Atrial Appendage Occluders which is to prevent ischemic stroke caused by nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF)
To characterize treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization among adults diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from the private setting in Venezuela.
Watchman FLX Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device Post Approval Study
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the practice patterns of rivaroxaban usage invenous-thromboembolism (VTE) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in cancer patients. The secondary objectives are to evaluate outcomes such as recurrent VTE, stroke and bleeding for cancer patients on rivaroxaban.
The purpose of this study is to determine and compare the persistence rate of newly prescribed apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran and VKAs in patients with NVAF.
This study is multicentric, single-blind, and interventional with a randomization into two parallel arm, between a standard of care information and an additional information of the patient, with a 12 month follow up. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized information program versus information provided from standard of care in patients taking Xarelto for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.
The purpose of this observational registry was to compare the safety and efficacy of an antithrombotic regimen comprising one single antiplatelet agent plus an oral anti-thrombotic versus those consisting of DAPT alone or DAPT plus oral antithrombotic therapy. This registry assessed whether the antithrombotic therapy intensity would vary positively with physician perceived ischemic risk at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and whether an inverse association would be observed with perceived bleeding risk. This study also evaluated the physician use of objective benefit-risk assessment scores and their influence on prescription of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing PCI. Additionally the study investigated whether patient perceived relevance and accessibility of anti-platelet and anticoagulant treatment regiments would predict treatment adherence and whether non-adherence would independently influence outcome. Approximately 514 subjects with non-valvular AF undergoing all-comer PCI were enrolled at 11 sites in North America and Europe. Follow-up was done via telephone by trained research coordinators at each participating site at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months.
The aim of the present registry is to characterize and follow patients prospectively and retrospectively with renal impairment who have been prescribed apixaban for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation, with a comparison to the characteristics and outcomes associated with warfarin therapy in this population.