View clinical trials related to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Filter by:The study is intended to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant combination of IPH5201 and durvalumab in addition to standard chemotherapy and adjuvant combination of IPH5201 and durvalumab in untreated patients with resectable, early-stage (stage II to IIIA) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
This is a single-arm, open-label, and multicenter phase Ⅱ study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rulonilimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung Cancer (NSCLC). Two cohorts were designed in this study: cohort 1 (non-squamous NSCLC) and cohort 2 (squamous NSCLC). About 84 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC plan to be enrolled in about 20 study sites of the study.
Clinical study BCD-201-1 is a double-blind randomized study of the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity of BCD-201 versus Keytruda following intravenous administration to subjects with advanced unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent melanoma and NSCLC. The study aimed to establish the equivalence of PK and similarity of the safety, immunogenicity, and PD profiles of BCD-201 and Keytruda.
A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial of Adebrelimab combined with bevacizumab and albumin paclitaxel in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after first-line immunotherapy progression.
A Phase 1/2 study of MRTX1133 in solid tumors harboring a KRAS G12D mutation.
The goal of this study is to test A2B530,an autologous logic-gated Tmod™ CAR T-cell product in subjects with solid tumors including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer (PANC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and other solid tumors that express CEA and have lost HLA-A*02 expression. The main questions this study aims to answer are: - Phase 1: What is the maximum or recommended dose of A2B530 that is safe for patients - Phase 2: Does the recommended dose of A2B530 kill the solid tumor cells and protect the patient's healthy cells Participants will be required to perform study procedures and assessments, and will also receive the following study treatments: - Enrollment and Apheresis in BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) - Preconditioning Lymphodepletion (PCLD) Regimen - A2B530 Tmod CAR T cells at the assigned dose
The goal of this exploratory study is understand the mechanisms of response to immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients. The investigators are going to search for correlation between specific biological features and response to immunotherapy, and to use those associations for developing an algorithm enabling to identify patients that could benefit from the immune check inhibitor based anti cancer treatment. Patients will provide biological samples before and during their treatment, and clinical data will be collected.
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled research study aims to objectively evaluate the role of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), which combines the theory of acupuncture with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy, for the treatment of pain in patients with bone metastases from lung cancer.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of radiation therapy to all tumour lesions, to first line medical treatment with alectinib in non-small cell lung cancer harbouring ALK-rearrangements. The main aims of the trial are to evaluate: - if the treatment combination is safe - if the treatment combination can inhibit progression Participants who have responded to 1st line alectinib will be treated with consolidation radiation therapy to all remaining tumour lesions while continuing on alectinib until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or another discontinuation criterion is met.
The primary objective is to evaluate Progression Free Survival (PFS) of the group (160 mg group) in which dose reduction was performed for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib. The Secondary objectives of this study are as follows. 1. To evaluate Progression-free survival (PFS) of the group maintaining the same dose (240mg group) and the group in which dose reduction was performed (160mg group) for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib 2. In the group maintaining the same dose (240mg group) and the group in which dose reduction was performed (160mg group) for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib, Time-to-Treatment Discontinuation(TTD), Objective Response Rate(ORR), Disease Control Rate(DCR), Tumor shrinkage and Overall Survival(OS) is evaluated. 3. In the group maintaining the same dose (240mg group) and the group in which dose reduction was performed (160mg group) for 12 weeks after the first administration of Lazertinib, specific reasons (adverse event name, grade, etc.) according to Lazertinib dose adjustment is evaluated. 4. To evaluate the treatment profile of Lazertinib including duration of treatment, dose adjustment, and reason for discontinuation of treatment. 5. To evaluate the safety of Lazertinib in the 240 mg and 160 mg groups