View clinical trials related to Nephrolithiasis.
Filter by:This study aims to compare the narrow focus (F1) versus the wide focus (F3) in terms of the efficacy of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) in the management of renal calculi 1-2 cm and their injurious effect on the kidney.
This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, open-label, single-center trial of up to 78 participants who are adult patients (aged 18-80 years) and are undergoing unilateral retrograde ureteroscopy with planned ureteral stent placement for treatment of urinary tract stones. Eligible patients will be randomly and divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Group A will receive fexofenadine 180 mg once daily in addition to standard of care treatment. Group B will receive placebo in addition to standard of care treatment. The routine standard of care treatment will consist of oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The primary outcomes of the study are the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) urinary symptom score and pain score. Secondary outcomes include (i) number of office phone calls due to urinary symptoms; (ii) duration of analgesic use; (iii) duration and quantity of narcotic use; (iv) number of emergency department visits; (v) drug-related adverse effects; (vi) other domains of the USSQ.
The aim of the study is to establish an infectious risk stratification system based on pre-and post-operative blood endotoxin profile.
The purpose of the study is to identify bacterial and fungal microbiome associated with calcium oxalate (CO) urolithiasis and renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
This protocol seeks to determine if weight reduction with the Optifast VLCD program leads to reduced contribution of endogenous oxalate synthesis to the urinary oxalate pool in obese calcium oxalate stone formers.
The investigator proposes an 18 month, feasibility pilot study, randomizing obese and diabetic individuals with pure uric acid nephrolithiasis (UAN) or mixed calcium oxalate (CO) UAN to either phentermine/topiramate or a pragmatic control group who will remain on their standard medication regimen (citrate salts, allopurinol, diet, etc.).
This is a single-center study that aims to better understand how diet and sex affect the risk of kidney stones in people who have had gastric bypass surgery. Subjects will be asked to follow a special (clinic-provided) diet for six days and come to a research clinic for 3 study visits.
The desire to reduce complications related to percutaneous access and morbidity related to tract size has led researchers to evaluate PCNL using smaller-caliber instruments. In this context, mini-PCNL has emerged. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated at the cost of a lower stone-free rate. The effectiveness of existing Ho: YAG lasers is limited by the need for manual removal of stone fragments and mobilization of them due to the lack of a simultaneous aspiration system. Consequently, this has been associated with long surgical times to achieve stone-free status. This requires multiple insertions and extractions of the nephroscope to facilitate the recovery of all fragments. This repeated step can cause the safety rails to be inadvertently removed or the sheaths to be disinserted. Sometimes compromising surgical results. Faced with this situation, the search for better and more efficient energy sources still continues. With this, modern lithotripters have emerged that combine energy sources and work more efficiently than any of them independently and, consequently, improve stone removal. Cyberwand ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), Swiss Lithoclast® Master / Select (EMS SA, Switzerland / Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and Shockpulse-SE ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) are some examples; although they have their own set of advantages, none have proven to be superior to any other. As previously discussed, ballistic-ultrasonic lithotripsy combines ultrasonic and ballistic energy together with a suction system with encouraging results in terms of a shorter lithotripsy time and the respective economic impact of fewer surgical events and less operating time required for the stone removal. Therefore, it is convenient to make a comparison between the results of lithotripsy with Ho: YAG laser energy and lithotripsy with LithoClast Trilogy EMS; and thereby determine which is the most effective method in the resolution of kidney stones through a miniaturized percutaneous tract.
This study will assess patients who have recurrent urinary tract infections and kidney stones which are not blocking the kidney or causing other problems. Currently, we don't know if taking out these stones will improve recurrent urinary tract infections or not. Patients will make a decision with their surgeon about removing or monitoring their stone(s). Whether or not their infections continue with surgery or monitoring will be noted, and this information may help to inform future treatment decisions. The purpose of this study is to assess if treatment of these asymptomatic stones affects the rate of recurrent urinary tract infections.
The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is increasing over the last two decades, and kidney stones is a recurrent disorder, with lifetime recurrence risks reported to be as high as 50%. One of the most challenging stones is the lower pole (LP) nephrolithiasis. The standard management of lower pole stones (LPS), is still controversial especially for stones smaller than 20 mm, with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and mini-PCNL (miniperc) both demonstrated to be safe and effective methods for treating LPS with a diameter of 1-2 cm. Selecting the optimal modality for treating renal calculi is challenging, as both techniques may be associated with different patient benefits and risk profiles. Despite the evolution of mini-PCNL and fURS techniques into clinical practice, there is a lack of comparative clinical data assessing SFRs and complication rates. To the investigators' knowledge, no previous studies have addressed the outcome of ambulatory tubeless miniperc as a same day procedure, which this study will look to assess. The investigators are planning to discharge all participants home the night of surgery, without admission or insertion of nephrostomy tube. This will decrease the morbidity of miniperc and encourage head-to-head comparison with fURS in a prospective randomized protocol.