View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is a Phase I/II, multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a novel BTK inhibitor, Orelabrutinib (ICP-022) in Patients with B-cell malignancies. The study contains two parts, Part 1 (dose escalation) and Part 2 (dose expansion).
This clinical trial is an interventional, active-treatment, open-label, multi-center, Phase 1/2 study. The study objectives are to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYT-0851 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies and advanced solid tumors and to identify a recommended Phase 2 dose as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for evaluation in these patients.
A phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label study of the safety, tolerability, PK, and efficacy of the novel MET/CSF1R/SRC inhibitor TPX-0022 in adult subjects with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, Gastric Cancer, or solid tumors harboring genetic alterations in MET. (SHIELD-I)
This is a study to assess the safety and efficacy of CXD101 in combination with the PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab in patients with metastatic, previously-treated, Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC). The primary hypothesis of this study is that CXD101 and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody synergise the anti-tumour activity in MSS colorectal cancer patients (~95% of CRC) who do not seem to respond to anti-PD1 or -PD-L1 immunotherapy alone.
This trial will be a two steps Phase I clinical study in patients with advanced solid tumors with an escalating phase (Step 1) followed by an expansion phase (Step 2) of BI 765063, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) antagonist to signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPĪ±) receptor, a myeloid checkpoint inhibitor administered as single agent, and in combination with BI 754091, a mAb antagonist to PD-1 receptor, a lymphocyte T checkpoint inhibitor.
This trial studies the problems that cancer patients face when filling prescriptions for opioids (medications that are used to manage pain). Pain is one of the most common symptoms among cancer patients. Opioid therapy is generally the treatment of choice for adequate management of cancer-related pain. Knowledge of these problems may help health care providers assess the most effective treatment options for cancer patients, and inform policy makers of the adjustments that need to be made to regulations to ensure cancer patients don't lose their access to opioids.
Our objective is to determine if the combination of simple ultrasound features (IOTA simple rules) and a new biomarker (HE4) together with a common tumour marker (CA 125) can accurately predict ovarian cancer in women found to have a pelvic mass on ultrasound. The investigators hypothesize that the use of two biomarkers (HE4 and CA 125) in a mathematical algorithm (Risk of Malignancy Algorithm, ROMA) can be used to predict malignancy in a pelvic mass which has indeterminate ultrasound features. This is a prospective cohort study involving women undergoing operation for a pelvic mass. 720 women scheduled to have an operation to remove a pelvic mass would be recruited from 3 hospitals (QMH, UCH and PYNEH). Pre-operatively, each woman will have an ultrasound assessment using the IOTA simple rules criteria and have blood taken for tumour markers HE4 and CA 125. In women where IOTA ultrasound rules are inconclusive, 2 strategies for prediction will be compared - calculation of risk by ROMA (Strategy A) vs referral for an expert ultrasound (Strategy B). These pre-operative risk predictions will be correlated with the final pathology found at the operations. Main outcome measures include the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive powers for Strategy A compared to Strategy B. Sensitivity and specificity will be compared using the McNemar test. Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) will be calculated and compared using the Delong method for the 2 strategies. The investigators expect AUC of both strategies will be similar. This would suggest that ROMA can replace expert ultrasound in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian cancer.
This is a 2 part study. Part 1 is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by dostarlimab versus placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by placebo; and Part 2 is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by dostarlimab plus niraparib versus placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by placebo in participants with recurrent or primary advanced (Stage III or IV) endometrial cancer.
This is a prospective, multi-centre, open label, non-randomized phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced G3 NENs of the GEP tract or of UK origin.
Study ASTX295-01 is a first in human Phase 1/2 open-label study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of ASTX295 in subjects with wild-type TP53 advanced solid tumors. Phase 1 is a dose escalation and dose expansion study design followed by a Phase 2 study.