View clinical trials related to Myocardial Infarction, Acute.
Filter by:Efficacy of the Pressure Optimization Protocol (POP) versus Conventional Stent Deployment Strategy during Primary PCI: An Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial The investigators will compare conventional rapid stent inflation/deflation during primary PCI with higher pressure and prolonged duration of stent deployment Study Hypothesis: The POP in stent deployment is superior to the conventional stent deployment approach with a significantly higher achievement of the TIMI III flow, significantly lesser occurrence of slow flow/no-reflow, and significantly higher rate of ST-Segment resolution during primary PCI.
Compare the safety and efficacy of a twice-daily Clopidogrel regimen vs. Ticagrelor in reducing major adverse events in patients undergoing primary PCI in a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
The Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction (RAMI) aims at regular and centralized acquiring and processing standard information about verified and suspected cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), monitoring of AMI cases, and establishing AMI diagnosis based on standard diagnostic criteria by doctors involved in the registry. The RAMI obtains data from all medical institutions, which could potentially document any cases of suspected AMI.
To evaluate the prognostic value of surem TRAF3IP2 levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction
This study aims to develop, implement, and determines the effectiveness of a personalized medicine approach to each individual's phenotype, based on an innovative physical exercise program to promote the treatment of pain and functional limitation resulting from knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in patients recovering after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiovascular risk (CVR). This randomized clinical study is important due to the lack of evidence according to the effectiveness of a personalized physical exercise intervention in people after MI or CVR with simultaneous KOA. Some studies have shown the existence of a relationship between OA and cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including coronary artery disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, cardiac procedures, or death related to CVD, since individuals with OA have a higher prevalence of CVD than individuals without OA. Sedentary behaviour is a risk factor for AMI, CVR and KOA, and, at the same time, physical exercise is a common non-pharmacological treatment for people suffering from these conditions, namely in the control of joint pain, gains in functional capacity, and the improvement of cardiorespiratory functional capacity, whose impact can be felt in level of quality of life. Chronic diseases have a significant impact on the global burden of disease, particularly CVD and OA, with the added presence of obesity also contributing to a high rate of all-cause morbidity and mortality, representing a substantial health burden and with growing implications for individuals, health systems and socioeconomic costs. The presence of OA seems to lead to an increased risk of developing CVD. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this relationship. Chronic inflammation associated with OA is one of the hypotheses suggested to explain the increased risk of CVD in these individuals. Furthermore, the pain and disability associated with OA may also limit participation in exercise/physical activity, influencing other risk factors associated with both chronic diseases, such as weight gain. The lack of studies about physical exercise intervention on people that suffered acute myocardial infarction or is in cardiovascular risk with simultaneous knee osteoarthritis and the lack of offer of phase III cardiac rehabilitation in Algarve motivated the development of this study, with the assumption of adopting a healthier lifestyle.
Non-commercial, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a secure, central, interactive, web-based response system, to intervention FCM or placebo arm. Time of observation 12 months [12 main study + 3 years follow up in substudy B]. Primary Study Objective: Primary: Evaluation of the effect of i.v. FCM treatment compared with placebo on the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, the risk of heart failure events (HFE*) (number of events and time to first event) during the 12-month follow-up and the change in quality of life (QoL) assessed using EQ-5D during the 8-month follow-up in patients with recent AMI and ID (with an implementation of a win ratio approach in a hierarchical descending order). *HFE: unplanned hospitalization for HF (including unplanned visit at emergency department due to HF), ambulatory significant intensification of diuretic therapy (either starting i.v. loop diuretic or more than doubling oral loop diuretic dose or de novo initiation of oral loop diuretic therapy due to HF signs/symptoms).
Introduction: Secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction may include cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle changes. Cardiac rehabilitation has mainly taken place in hospitals without coordination with primary healthcare. Motivational interviews have been shown to be effective as a means for change in patients after acute myocardial infarction. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a cardiac rehabilitation program with motivational interviews in patients discharged from hospital after acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Randomized clinical non-pharmacological trial. A minimum sample of 284 participants requiring cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction in six primary healthcare centers. Participants will be randomized to cardiac rehabilitation with motivational interviews or normal standard of care. All secondary results will be evaluated at 1,3 and 6 months.
Patients with heart attack or heart injury are tested (angiogram) for blockages in their arteries. Many patients develop heart problems caused by damage to small (microvascular) blood vessels. These issues are also relevant to patients with coronarvirus-19 disease (COVID-19). Eplerenone reduces blood vessel injury and is used to treat heart failure. Aim: to test the use of eplerenone in patients with heart attack/heart injury who have small vessel disease, including patients with COVID-19 Patients referred to the Golden Jubilee hospital with a suspected heart attack heart / injury will be invited to participate into a registry-based clinical trial. Screening, enrolment and verbal, informed consent will be obtained during the angiogram then written consent on the ward. Small vessel disease will be assessed using a 'diagnostic' guidewire during the standard angiogram. People with small vessel problems will be allocated to a clinical trial of usual care or eplerenone. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is defined as an index of microvascular resistance ≥25. Coronary flow reserve (CFR abnormal <2.0) and resistance reserve ratio (RRR abnormal <2.0), measured simultaneously with IMR, are predefined parameters of interest. Patients will be allocated into one of the 3 groups: - Group 1: Patients without coronary microvascular dysfunction. No eplerenone - Group 2: Patient with coronary microvascular dysfunction. Usual care, no eplerenone. - Group 3: Small vessels abnormal. Eplerenone tablets. The primary outcome for the trial will be reduced heart injury (biomarkers) in patients with microvascular disease. We will also test heart function (MRI scan) at enrolment and at six months. All patients (Groups 1, 2 and 3) will have an angiogram. Standard blood tests will be collected during the hospital stay, and then again at 1 and 6 months. Other outcomes include questionnaires (health status). We will gather information on longer-term health outcomes (hospitalisation, death) using confidential electronic record linkage. We will ask for permission to store blood samples for future research. The research will improve scientific knowledge about eplerenone therapy in this patient group. The study will create a repository of clinical samples and images which will provide vital data for studies of COVID-19.
Results from recent clinical trials on bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNC) transplantation show that this intervention can help reduce the incidence of heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, no study has evaluated the effect of the transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on a clinical endpoint such as HF. This single-blinded, randomized, multicenter trial aims to establish whether the intracoronary infusion of umbilical cord-derived Wharton's jelly MSCs (WJ-MSCs) helps prevent HF development after AMI. The study will enroll 240 patients 3 to 7 days following an AMI treated with primary percutaenous coronary intervention (PPCI). Only patients aged below 65 years with impaired LV function (LVEF < 40%) will be included. They will be randomized to receive either a single intracoronary infusion of WJ-MSCs or standard care. The primary outcome of this study is the assessment of HF development during long-term follow-up (four years). Since the efficacy of MSCs is higher than BM-MNCs after AMI in the improvement of LVEF, it would be probable that these cells may have a better clinical effect as well. However, no study has evaluated the impact of the transplantation of MSCs on a clinical endpoint such as HF. This study will help determine whether or not the infusion of intracoronary WJ-MSCs in patients
Many patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD), which is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, there have been few studies regarding revascularization strategy in patients with NSTEMI and MVD. Therefore, we planned to perform prospective, open-label, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immediate complete revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] for both infarct-related artery [IRA] and non-IRA during index PCI) compared to staged PCI strategy of non-IRA (PCI for IRA followed by non-IRA PCI after several days). PCI procedure at non-IRA with diameter stenosis between 50 and 69% should be conducted with the aid of fractional flow reserve (FFR), and non-IRA with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% will be revascularized without FFR.