View clinical trials related to Muscle Spasticity.
Filter by:The primary aim of this study is to gain knowledge about both the effects of a single bout of static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and the effects of 8-week static and PNF stretching training on the calf muscle-tendon properties in children with spastic cerebral palsy (SCP). Furthermore, the effects on joint and muscle function, stretch reflexes, gait, and self-reported gait function and functional performance are examined to receive a comprehensive picture of potential changes. Further aims of this study are to identify which stretching technique might be more efficient by comparing the effects of both stretching interventions, and to gain information about the influence of foot flexibility on the stretch achieved by the spastic gastrocnemius muscle.
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of permanent disorders affecting movement and postural development that are caused by non-progressive disruptions of the brain, usually occurring during fetal period or infancy. It is commonly accompanied with sensory disorders and learning disability. In 2016, more than 17 million people are affected by CP with a prevalence of 1.5 to 2.5 per 1,000 live births. CP remains to be the most common cause of severe physical disability in children. The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated an economic cost of US$4.1 million per CP patient that comprises of medical services, special education and productivity loss. Current management of spasticity involves physical manipulation such as passive stretching and splinting, sometimes combined with oral pharmacologic treatment, intrathecal baclofen therapy and botulinum toxin injection. At times, surgical procedures such as Surgical Dorsal Rhizotomy (SDR) can also be considered. Botulinum toxin injection has been shown to reduce spasticity for up to 6 months, however, the cost of the procedure remains to be an issue in developing countries like Indonesia. Therefore, other modality such as a non-invasive therapy should be considered as an alternative treatment for spasticity. Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (rESWT) is a non-invasive treatment that has been shown to effectively improve spasticity in patients with spastic motor type CP, despite unclear underlying mechanism. According to International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST), there has yet to be a recommended guideline for the treatment of spasticity in children using rESWT. One crucial physical parameter needed to be determined is the number of pulse required to efficiently reduce spasticity. The number of pulse directly affects the duration of ESWT per session (the higher the number of pulse given, the longer the therapy session). This may be a concern for spastic motor type CP due to accompanying sensory and learning disability. Therefore, the objective of this study was to understand whether the reduction in hamstring stiffness in children with spastic CP could be influenced by the number of pulse in a single ESWT session.
MS patients were randomly divided into traditional therapy and traditional therapy + cervical mobilization groups. While muscle strengthening, stretching, balance and coordination exercises were given to the traditional group, cervical mobilization was applied in addition to these in cervical group. Patients received treatments twice a week for 4 weeks. The effect of the applied treatment on the tonus and plantar pressure distribution was analyzed. Treatments were interrupted for 4 weeks and the groups continued with the treatment they did not receive (crossover design). The group that received traditional treatment in the first period completed traditional + cervical mobilization, and the other group with traditional + cervical mobilization traditionally completed the treatment.
Children with CP encounter swallow and feeding impairments, especially in infancy and childhood with long meal times with late development of oral motor skills resulting in poor growth.
Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is currently regarded as one of the most promising intervention methods to improve motor function in individuals with severe spinal cord injury. In parallel, an increasing number of studies is suggesting that noninvasive SCS can improve spasticity and residual motor control in the same subject population. The present study explores whether single sessions of noninvasive SCS would improve walking performance and ameliorate spasticity in individuals with multiple sclerosis.
The objectives of this study are To determine the effect of virtual reality on balance and gross motor functions of the lower limb in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. To determine the effect of virtual reality with sensory input on balance and gross motor functions of the lower limb in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. To compare the effects of virtual reality training with and without sensory input on balance and gross motor functions of the lower limb in spastic diplegic CP. Its is a Randomized control trial (RCT) done at Physiotherapy department of Railway General Hospital Rawalpindi and National Institute of rehabilitation Medicine.44 individuals (calculated using epi tool) 22 individuals in each group. Individuals who met the inclusion criteria will be included in this study. All participants will go through randomization and divided into two groups Experimental and Control groups. Pre-intervention assessment is made for both groups. Then intervention will be applied to both groups. estimated time of treatment protocol will be 40 min/day, 1 time / d, 3 times/week for 6 weeks. Subjects will be evaluated at baseline, then 3rd week and 6th-week assessment will be the final
The aim of the study is to describe the long-term use of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in adult subjects affected with upper limb spasticity (ULS) +/- lower limb spasticity (LLS) who received treatment with Dysport® for a minimum of three injections cycles at the Instituto de Medicina Física e Reabilitação do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IMREA HC FMUSP) in Brazil.
This was a multicentric observational study with the aim to evaluate the effect of early treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) on post-stroke spasticity in adult patients. All patients enrolled (86 patients) after a baseline clinical assessment (modified Ashworth scale, motricity index, Fughl Meyer assessment and modified Rankin' scale) undergoes to a BoNT-A injection following the evidence-based clinical practice. Subsequently, at 4, 12 and 24 weeks they underwent the same clinical evaluation as a follow-up. Results are under statistical evaluation.
The aim of the study is to describe treatment outcomes of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) and onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) treatments, after one injection of either treatment, in toxin-naïve adult patients with upper and/or lower limb spasticity at a single National Health Service (NHS) centre in the United Kingdom (UK).
The aim of the study is to describe the long term use of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) in adult subjects affected with upper and/or lower limb spasticity who received treatment with BoNT-A for a minimum of three injections cycles at three Italian centers. The study has a retrospective design and data relating to subjects' injections cycles occurred in the past are collected. Period of observation defined in the protocol is from 2008 to 2018, but it could change for each subject according to the number of injections cycles performed. Time frame for data collection is 12 months from study start.