Use of Audio Recordings of Self-Hypnosis and Meditation for Fatigue Management in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial

— AUDIO  

Official title:

Use of Audio Recordings of Self-Hypnosis and Meditation for Fatigue Management in Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04688710
• Other study ID #: STUDY00011189
• Secondary ID: RG-2001-36025
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 30, 2021
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: University of Washington
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of two self-guided psychological treatments, Self-Hypnosis (HYP) and Mindfulness Meditation (MM) compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU) for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically significant fatigue.

Description:

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) often have problems with fatigue that can interfere with other treatments. As many as 90% of individuals with MS experience persistent fatigue and 40% of individuals with MS describe fatigue as their most debilitating symptom. Fatigue in individuals with MS is also associated with greater distress and lower overall quality of life. Unfortunately, available treatments provide inadequate relief for most people. There remains an urgent need for additional treatment options for MS-related fatigue. The purpose of this study is to see if self-guided psychological treatments delivered through audio recordings can help decrease fatigue severity in people with MS.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of two promising and innovative psychological treatments, Mindfulness Meditation (MM) and Self-Hypnosis (HYP), for helping individuals with MS manage fatigue. Since these treatments are self-guided, findings will provide evidence for the efficacy of highly accessible treatments, ultimately resulting in treatment interventions that can be easily disseminated without the need for highly trained specialist clinicians.

Primary Aim: The primary aim of the proposed research is to evaluate the beneficial effects of two treatments (HYP and MM) for reducing MS-related fatigue, relative to Treatment as Usual (TAU).

Primary Hypothesis (stated under the alternative): Participants assigned to HYP and MM conditions will report significantly greater reductions in fatigue at post-treatment, the primary end point, than those assigned to the TAU condition.

The proposed research also has three secondary aims:

Secondary Aim 1: To investigate whether there are beneficial effects of the two active treatments, relative to TAU, on pre- to post-treatment changes in secondary quality of life outcomes (e.g., sleep quality, pain intensity).

Secondary Aim 2: To investigate whether there are longer-term benefits of the two active treatments, relative to each other and to TAU, on the primary and secondary outcomes, up to 6 months post-treatment.

Exploratory Aim 3: To investigate whether there is participant preference for either of the two active treatments, and investigate their relative effects on the study outcomes in an "open label" effectiveness analysis.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 333
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: June 27, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Self-reported diagnosis of MS.

2. Age 18 years old or older at the time of study enrollment.

3. Presenting with clinically meaningful fatigue (i.e., reporting daily fatigue =50% of the days in the past 6 months with an average severity in the past week of = 20 on the PROMIS Fatigue short form [T-score, 56.4]).

4. Able to read, speak, and understand English.

5. Access to an internet-enabled device (desktop/laptop/tablet/smart phone) to allow access to the recordings and to complete the study measures via the internet.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Psychiatric condition or symptoms that would interfere with participation, specifically (a) current active suicidal ideation with current intent to harm oneself, (b) current psychosis, or (c) current mania.

2. Currently receiving psychological treatment for fatigue more than once per month.

3. Has received mindfulness meditation or hypnosis training in the past and has practiced mindfulness meditation/hypnosis in the past three months.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fatigue
• Multiple Sclerosis
• Sclerosis

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Self-Hypnosis (HYP)
Self-Hypnosis (HYP) teaches skills people with MS can use to effectively self-manage symptoms related to fatigue. Recordings are designed to help participants learn new strategies for influencing fatigue and its effects on their lives. The Self-Hypnosis recordings will start with a relaxation hypnotic induction (e.g., "Notice how with each breath, you are feeling more and more relaxed …") followed by hypnotic suggestions (e.g., for experiencing more energy, improved sleep, more comfort or less pain, etc.). The goal of Self-Hypnosis is to change participant's experiences. To the extent that participants respond to the suggestions, participants would then get more control over their feelings of energy, sleep quality, and comfort levels.
• Mindfulness Meditation (MM)
Mindfulness Meditation (MM) teaches skills people with MS can use to effectively self-manage symptoms related to fatigue. Recordings are designed to help participants learn about a new way to live with chronic fatigue and new ways to relate to how fatigue may influence their thoughts, feelings, and behavior. The mindfulness techniques train the mind to non-judgmentally observe experience (e.g., symptoms of fatigue or pain, etc.) on a moment-to-moment basis, with an attitude of acceptance. The goal of Mindfulness Meditation is not to alter experiences, but rather to change how someone responds to their experiences. With practice, automatic, kneejerk reactions to symptoms are replaced with mindful choices about how best to respond to symptoms. This will "lighten the load" of living with the symptoms, moving participants in the valued direction of their choosing.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	UW Medicine Multiple Sclerosis Center	Seattle	Washington

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Washington	National Multiple Sclerosis Society, The University of Queensland

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Medication and/or Cannabis Use	Medication use will be assessed by asking participants to report whether or not they are using any opioids, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, sedative/hypnotic, or NSAID medications or cannabinoids or marijuana products within the past 7 days.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Frequency and Duration of Listening to Treatment Audio Recordings	Frequency and duration of listening to treatment recordings will be logged by the software participants will use to access recordings. Treatment	Each time treatment recordings are accessed from Week 1 through Week 24
Other	Change in Fatigue Catastrophizing	Change in pain catastrophizing will be measured with items from the University of Washington (UW) Concerns about Pain (UW CAP-6-SF), adapted for fatigue symptoms. The UW CAP-6-SF, adapted for fatigue is scored by summing item responses for a total raw score from 6-30. Higher scores indicate a higher level of fatigue catastrophizing.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Pain Type	Pain type will be assessed using the painDETECT Pain Questionnaire to assess for the presence of neuropathic pain. The painDETECT is scored by summing responses to each item to create a total raw score between 0-38, where a score of 0-12 indicates neuropathic pain component is unlikely (<15%), a score of 13-18 indicates the result is ambiguous and a neuropathic pain component can be present, and a score of 19-38 indicates a neuropathic pain component is likely (>90%).	Baseline (prior to treatment)
Other	Change in Pain Catastrophizing	Change in fatigue catastrophizing will be measured with items from the University of Washington (UW) Concerns about Pain (UW CAP-2-SF). The UW CAP-2-SF, is scored by summing item responses for a total raw score from 2-10. The total raw score will then be converted to a IRT (Item Response Theory)-based T-score. Higher T scores indicate a higher level of pain catastrophizing. Higher scores indicate a higher level of pain catastrophizing.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Change in Readiness to Engage in Pain Self-Management	Readiness to engage in pain self-management will be measured using the items/scales from the Multidimensional Pain Readiness to Change Questionnaire, Version 2 (MPRCQ2), with additional items about meditation and self-hypnosis. The MPRCQ2 is scored by summing the responses for each scale (e.g, exercise, relaxation, pacing, etc.) or sub scale and dividing by the number of items to get the mean response. Higher scores in each scale or sub scale indicates higher levels of that domain in regards to pain management.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Change in Pain-Related Cognitive Processes	Change in pain-related cognitive processes will be assessed using the pain openness scales from the Pain-Related Cognitive Processes Questionnaire (PCPQ). The pain openness scales are scored by adding up items in the scale and dividing by number of items to completed to find the mean response. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain openness.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Change in Satisfaction with Life assessed via the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)	Change in satisfaction with life will be assessed using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). The SWLS is scored by summing the items to create a total raw score from 5-35. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with life.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Change in Mindfulness	Change in mindfulness will be assessed using the 15-item Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15). The FFMQ-15 is scored by summing items to create a total raw score from 15-75 with higher scores indicating higher levels of mindfulness.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Other	Outcome Expectancy	Outcome expectancy refers to assessing participants' expectations regarding how logical and effective they believe the treatment they are randomized to receive will be prior to engaging in treatment. Participants' expectations regarding their outcomes are measured on a scale of 0-10 with higher scores indicating higher expectations for treatment success.	Baseline (prior to treatment)
Primary	Change in Fatigue Severity	Change in fatigue severity will be measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The 21-item MFIS was selected as the measure of choice for assessing fatigue in MS populations by the MS Council for Clinical Practice Guidelines. The MFIS is also listed as one of the NIH NINDS' common data elements for MS. With the MFIS, respondents indicate the frequency with which they experience each fatigue-related outcome (e.g., forgetful, weak muscles) on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Never; 4 = Almost always). The items can be scored into three subscales (reflecting cognitive, physical, and psychosocial fatigue impact) or a total fatigue severity score.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Sleep Quality assessed via PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 4a, version 1.0	Change in sleep quality will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short Form 4a, version 1.0. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of sleep disturbance.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Pain Interference	Change in pain interference will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form 4a, version 1.1. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of pain interference.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Pain Intensity and Fatigue (current)	Change in current pain intensity and fatigue will be measured using a 0-10 numeric rating scale immediately before and after listening to audio recordings.	Immediately before and after listening to treatment audio recordings
Secondary	Change in Pain Intensity (past week)	Change in pain intensity in the past week will be measured using a 0-10 numeric rating scale.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Depressive Symptoms	Change in depressive symptoms will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form 4a, version 1.0. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of depressive symptoms.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Anxiety	Change in symptoms of anxiety will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Short Form 4a, version 1.0. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of anxiety symptoms.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Physical Function	Change in physical function will be measured with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 4a, version 2.0. Responses from each item will be summed to form a total raw score ranging from 4-20. Higher scores indicate higher self-reported levels of physical functioning.	Baseline (prior to treatment), Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Treatment Preference	Participants' preferences for each of the three randomization groups will be measured at baseline (prior to treatment). Treatment preferences will be measured using a 0 (not at all interested) - 10 (extremely interested) numerical rating scale to gauge interest in each randomization group.	Baseline (prior to treatment)
Secondary	Device Use for Treatment	Type of device(s) used to access treatment recordings will be assessed by participant self-report.	Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Global Impression of Change	Global impression of change will be measured by participant self-report. Participants will report, since the start of the study, how much they think their overall fatigue intensity, interference of fatigue in daily activities, and ability to manage fatigue has changed on a scale of 1 (very much improved) - 7 (very much worse).	Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Change in Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction	Global assessment of treatment satisfaction will be measured by participant self-report on a scale of 0 (very dissatisfied) - 4 (very satisfied).	Week 4 (post-treatment), Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)
Secondary	Barriers and Facilitators to Treatment	Barriers and facilitators to participants engaging in treatment will be assessed by qualitative open-ended questions asking what made it harder or easier for participants to listen to recordings, as well as what participants liked most and least about listening to recordings.	Week 12 (3 month follow-up), Week 24 (6-month follow-up)