Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02188979
Other study ID # GLOBE
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received July 6, 2014
Last updated July 10, 2014
Start date March 2012
Est. completion date April 2014

Study information

Verified date July 2014
Source Università degli Studi di Brescia
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Italy: Ministry of Health
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

BACKGROUND Unpredicted difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) with Macintosh laryngoscopy occurs frequently in obese patients. We investigated the incidence of DTI using the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope (GVL) with an algorithm based on a pre-operative assessment with the El Ganzouri Risk Index (EGRI).

METHODS We prospectively enrolled morbidly obese patients (BMI>40 kg/m2) undergoing abdominal surgery. Patients were scheduled for flexible fibre optic bronchoscopic intubation (FFBI) or GVL intubation if the EGRI score was ≥7 or <7, respectively. The primary outcome was the occurrence of DTI that was defined as Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grades ≥III, Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)>5 and modified IDS (mIDS)>5. A numeric rating scale (NRS) was also used. Secondary outcomes included intubation success during the first attempt, the time to Cormack (TTC), the time to intubation (TTI), failure to intubate, oxygen desaturation and difficult ventilation.


Description:

The EGRI, a multivariate risk index that combines seven variables associated with DTI, was evaluated in all patients during the pre-anaesthesia visit. The results were reported in the clinical chart. All tracheal intubations in obese patients needing surgery were routinely performed using GVL. The intubations were performed or assisted by five board-certified anaesthesiologists who had prior experience with at least 20 GVL intubations, as well as at least two years of experience with anaesthesia in obese patients. In cases where the GVL intubation was performed by anaesthesiologists that were in training, the GVL expert was actively advising the operator during all of the intubating procedures. The standard equipment included a GVL with blade number three to five and an orotracheal hockey stick tube with a malleable single-use stylet (Fr 14, Intubating Stylet, DEAS). The standard anaesthesia induction started with 3-5 minutes of pre-oxygenation using 5 cm H2O PEEP in a 30° head-up position, as well as induction with fentanyl 3 μg kg -1 (LBW), propofol 2-3 mg kg -1 (LBW) and suxamethonium 1 mg Kg -1 (TBW). When spontaneous respiration ceased, the patient was mask ventilated with 100% oxygen. The tube was lubricated and advanced into the mouth under direct visual guidance to avoid complications, and then, under indirect visual guidance using the GVL monitor. The correct placement of the cuffed tube was verified using a capnograph and a stethoscope. The tube sizes were 7.0 for women and 7.5 for men. Each patient was monitored using an electrocardiogram, non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement, and pulse oximetry before both tracheal intubation and anaesthesia induction. The basic demographic data and airway characteristics necessary to evaluate the primary outcome and to calculate the EGRI score were registered prior to anaesthesia. Patients with an EGRI score of 7 or higher were scheduled for elective fibre optic flexible bronchoscopic intubation (FFBI), while patients with an EGRI score of less than 7 underwent anaesthesia induction and GVL intubation, according to a predefined algorithm


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 195
Est. completion date April 2014
Est. primary completion date April 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Body Mass Index (BMI)>40 kg m-2.

- Surgery with tracheal intubation scheduled

Exclusion Criteria:

- age < 18 years

- severe psychological disorders that have the possibility of limiting the patient's comprehension of information

- previously impossible mask ventilation or intubation with GVL

- presence of pharyngo-laryngeal or neck tumours

Study Design

Observational Model: Case-Only, Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care Medicine and Emergency University of Brescia at Spedali Civili. Brescia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Università degli Studi di Brescia

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (23)

Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1290-7. — View Citation

Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Oct;55(9):1090-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02498.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8. — View Citation

Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182023eb7. — View Citation

Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery Worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009 Dec;19(12):1605-11. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-0014-5. — View Citation

Caldiroli D, Cortellazzi P. A new difficult airway management algorithm based upon the El Ganzouri Risk Index and GlideScope® videolaryngoscope: a new look for intubation? Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Oct;77(10):1011-7. Epub 2011 May 24. — View Citation

Caldiroli D, Molteni F, Sommariva A, Frittoli S, Guanziroli E, Cortellazzi P, Orena EF. Upper limb muscular activity and perceived workload during laryngoscopy: comparison of Glidescope(R) and Macintosh laryngoscopy in manikin: an observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):563-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet347. Epub 2013 Oct 22. — View Citation

Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109 Suppl 1:i68-i85. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes393. Review. — View Citation

Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):191-8. — View Citation

Cortellazzi P, Minati L, Falcone C, Lamperti M, Caldiroli D. Predictive value of the El-Ganzouri multivariate risk index for difficult tracheal intubation: a comparison of Glidescope videolaryngoscopy and conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Dec;99(6):906-11. Epub 2007 Oct 25. — View Citation

DeMaria EJ. Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 24;356(21):2176-83. Review. — View Citation

el-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204. — View Citation

Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, O'Reilly M. Grading scale for mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):267. — View Citation

Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, Desmonts JM. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):595-600, table of contents. — View Citation

Kim WH, Ahn HJ, Lee CJ, Shin BS, Ko JS, Choi SJ, Ryu SA. Neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio: a new predictor of difficult intubation in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):743-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer024. Epub 2011 Feb 24. — View Citation

Maassen R, Lee R, Hermans B, Marcus M, van Zundert A. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1560-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a. Epub 2009 Aug 27. — View Citation

Nicholson A, Smith AF, Lewis SR, Cook TM. Tracheal intubation with a flexible intubation scope versus other intubation techniques for obese patients requiring general anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 17;1:CD010320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010320.pub2. Review. — View Citation

Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1549-55. — View Citation

Padwal RS, Klarenbach SW, Wang X, Sharma AM, Karmali S, Birch DW, Majumdar SR. A simple prediction rule for all-cause mortality in a cohort eligible for bariatric surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013 Dec;148(12):1109-15. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3953. — View Citation

Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jan;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832d328d. — View Citation

Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Feb;79(2):121-9. Epub 2012 Oct 2. — View Citation

Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M. The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):381-4. Epub 2004 Nov 26. — View Citation

Xue FS, Li CW, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Liu KP, Liu J, Wang X. GlideScope-assisted awake fibreoptic intubation: initial experience in 13 patients. Anaesthesia. 2006 Oct;61(10):1014-5. — View Citation

Ydemann M, Rovsing L, Lindekaer AL, Olsen KS. Intubation of the morbidly obese patient: GlideScope(®) vs. Fastrach™. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Jul;56(6):755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02693.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23. — View Citation

* Note: There are 23 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Occurrence of DTI that was defined as Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grades =III, Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)>5 and modified IDS (mIDS)>5. A numeric rating scale (NRS) was also used. The primary outcome was the incidence of DTI. Because scores specifically designed to assess DTI with GVL are not available, we used the Cormack and Lehane (C&L) grades =III, the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) >5 and a modified IDS (mIDS) >5 to assess DTI. We also conducted a subjective assessment of DTI as rated by the operator on a numeric rating scale (NRS), from 0 (easiest) to 10 (the most difficult procedure). Ten minutes after the intubation Yes
Secondary frequency of tracheal intubation success during the first attempt The frequency of intubation success at the first attempt was defined as being when the tracheal intubation was successfully achieved with all the following criteria fulfilled: a single introduction of the laryngoscope and tube progression, C&L I or IIa without external laryngeal displacement, and no need for help by another operator. Ten minutes after the intubation Yes
Secondary the time to Cormack (TTC) and the time to tracheal intubation (TTI). TTC was measured from the time the instrument entered patient's mouth until the optimal laryngeal view. TTI was measured from the time the instrument entered the patient's mouth until the tube cuff inflation. Ten minutes after the intubation No
Secondary intubation failures Failure to intubate was defined as when tracheal intubation proved impossible after three attempts Ten minutes after the intubation failure Yes
Secondary difficult mask ventilation Difficult ventilation was defined with the use of the Han scale Ten minutes after the intubation Yes
Secondary oxygen desaturation Oxygen desaturation was defined as an oxygen saturation of less than 90% Ten minutes after the intubation Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03657927 - A Comparison of McGrath MAC Versus C-MAC Videolaryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04934826 - Comparison of the Absorption of Hydrolyzed or Intact Proteins in Morbid Obese Patients After the Roux Y Gastric Bypass N/A
Completed NCT03181347 - The Microbiology of Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03886870 - Obesity, Lifestyle and Work Intervention N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04433338 - The PREBA Study: Effect of Preoperative Weight Loss With a 14-day Low-calorie Diet on Surgical Procedure and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing RYGB Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03553849 - Utilization of Very Low Calorie Diet in Obese General Surgery Patients N/A
Completed NCT05854875 - Diabetes Remission After RYGBP and RYGBP With Fundus Resection N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03203161 - Registry on Obesity Surgery in Adolescents
Not yet recruiting NCT03601273 - Bariatric Embolization Trial for the Obese Nonsurgical Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02129296 - Intragastric Balloon, Air Versus Fluid Filled: Randomized Prospective Study Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT01564732 - Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Plicated Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding N/A
Completed NCT02033265 - Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: Influence of Obesity
Completed NCT01963637 - Gastric Volumetry by Gastric Tomodensitometry With Gas N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01652105 - Randomized Trial of Preoperative Diets Before Bariatric Surgery N/A
Completed NCT01149512 - Outcomes of the Adjustable Gastric Band in a Publicly Funded Obesity Program N/A
Terminated NCT01759550 - Prospective Case-Series of Ligasure Advance Pistol Grip and LigaSure Blunt Tip
Completed NCT01955993 - Fentanyl Metabolism in Obese Adolescents N/A
Recruiting NCT01685177 - Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass vs Standard Duodenal Switch as a Second Step After Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-Morbid Obese Patient N/A
Completed NCT02414893 - Hunger/Satiety's Physiopathologic Study in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Terminated NCT01041261 - Effects of a Novel Dietary Intervention on Body Composition After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery N/A