View clinical trials related to Morality.
Filter by:Care practices, mortality and morbidity of very premature infants from two different tertiary centers were collected and compared, in order to discover areas for improvement where these two newborn centers can learn from each other.
Neurosurgical practice has seen many important changes over several decades with advances in treatments and the types of patients treated. Neurosurgical procedures have evolved, and as outcomes have improved the number of patients being treated has increased. There are no recent evaluations of national neurosurgical practice in the United Kingdom (UK), with the last prospective cohort studies being Safe Neurosurgery 1993 and Safe Neurosurgery 2000. More recent studies of neurosurgical services have been based on data from single institutions or surgeons and these may not give a representative picture of practice nationally. Recent national quality improvement programmes for neurosurgery in England (such as the National Neurosurgical Audit Programme (NNAP) and Cranial Neurosurgery and Spinal Surgery Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) Programmes) have focused on using national hospital administrative datasets. To be effective, quality improvement initiatives require robust outcome measures and quality (process) indicators. Currently, there is a lack of validated quality indicators for neurosurgery, with practice often being described using generic measures such as readmission and reoperation rates and length of stay. Many studies have been able to derive these common outcome measures, but it may also be possible to produce indicators specific to neurosurgery. The aim of this observational study was firstly to describe the current pattern of neurosurgical admissions and procedures in England, and thereby given an overview of the epidemiology of neurosurgical patients. Secondly, it aims to investigate the range of outcome measures that might be produced from hospital administrative data and use these to assess the quality of care in neurosurgery.
Background and Rationale: Sepsis is a universal healthcare problem with a high incidence and mortality. Improvement in early sepsis recognition and management has reduced the 28 day- and in-hospital mortality in the last two decades. Mortality rates from sepsis ranges from 20% to 30% of which one-third occurs within 3 days of ICU admission. Identifying patients with sepsis or septic shock who are at increased risk of early death can direct the priority of care for these patients and assist in predicting who is most likely to benefit from higher levels of care. In addition, this can encourage for direct future clinical trials to investigate new therapeutic interventions. Despite the large body of research on biomarkers (e.g. Serum lactate, interlukins) and clinical prediction tools (e.g. mSOFA score, APACHE II) for rapid risk stratification and in-hospital mortality of septic patients, the early identification of patients at increased risk for clinical deterioration remains challenging and the data on predictors of early death in septic patients remains deficient. Persistently low MAP or DAP have been related to worse outcomes in septic shock, this was aggravated by the new-onset prolonged sinus tachycardia which occur as a result of sympathetic activity. This associated tachycardia has been linked to increased major cardiovascular events, prolonged length of stay and higher mortality rates The recent study by Ospina-Tascón et al. presented a novel index, the "diastolic shock index" (DSI), defined as the ratio of heart rate (HR) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP). They studied the diastolic shock index relation to clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. In their study, this index represented a very early identifier of patients at high risk of death within 28 days and 90 days after admission, while isolated DAP or HR values did not clearly identify such risk. A few previous studies focused on the comparison between shock indices for prediction of sepsis outcomes and their results had a preference for DSI and MSI over SI.In this study we defined early mortality as that will occur within 3 days from admission or start of septic shock. This definition was based on previous works performed in patients with septic shock, for whom trends in organ failures during the first 3 days in the ICU were found accurate predictors of outcome . However, almost no study focused on the ability of the diastolic shock index to predict early ICU mortality from sepsis within 72 hours from admission. So, this study aims to fill this gap in the literature. Objectives : to investigate the ability of the diastolic shock index to predict early ICU mortality from sepsis within 72 hours from admission
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of trazodone as compared to quetiapine and placebo, in the management of ICU delirium in adult (>=18 years old) surgical ICU patients. The investigators will compare outcomes such as delirium incidence and duration, in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, mechanical ventilator days, complications, adverse effects, rescue medication use, delirium symptom severity, sleep duration, and sleep quality among participants receiving trazodone, quetiapine, or placebo. The investigators hypothesize participants receiving trazodone will have a shorter duration of delirium, decreased delirium severity, and improved sleep quality compared to participants receiving quetiapine and placebo.
Lung surgery, open aortic surgery, TEVAR, and EVAR are major operations that carry a higher incidence of perioperative mortality and complications compare to other surgery. The study of the incidence of mortality and complications will help the hospital to benchmark with the others. Also the study of the risk factors of mortality and major complications will help to improve the patients' outcomes.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the top three causes of death worldwide now. Acute exacerbations (AEs) of COPD are a risk factor for lung function deterioration, poor quality of life, longer hospitalization, and increased mortality. To date, COPD is associated with a heavy clinical and socioeconomic burden, of which AEs of COPD account for a significant part of the cost of patients with COPD. Although several retrospective cohort studies and post-hoc analyses from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that AECOPD patients with higher blood eosinophils had a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS), lower doses of corticosteroid use, and better response to systematic corticosteroid treatment than those with lower blood eosinophils, the efficacy of systematic corticosteroids in AECOPD patients with higher blood eosinophils has not been confirmed by RCTs. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate if AECOPD patients admitted to hospitals with higher blood eosinophil levels could benefit from systemic corticosteroid therapy. In this study, all eligible AECOPD participants with peripheral blood eosinophil blood count >2% or > 300 cells/μL will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either a control group or a systemic corticosteroid group. The control group will receive an oral placebo of 40mg/day for five consecutive days in addition to standard treatment during emergency admission or hospitalization. And systemic corticosteroid group will receive oral prednisone 40mg/day for five consecutive days and standard treatment. This study will provide evidence on using peripheral blood eosinophil blood count to guide corticosteroid therapy in AECOPD patients and help the clinician make an individual decision for each patient.
This study will test whether anesthesiology clinicians working in a telemedicine setting can predict patient risk for postoperative complications (death and acute kidney injury) more accurately with access to a machine learning display than without it.
The COVERT Collaborative is led by a group of academic surgeons that is looking into the impact of the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic on Trauma and Orthopaedic practice. This will involve both trauma and elective procedures, as well as mortality rates, operative and anaesthetic case mix. The information will help to shape service reconfiguration and enhance patient-specific treatment especially in the threat of potential subsequent waves and future pandemics.
NYU's High Risk Program targets patients who may be more likely to have increased hospitalization due to health conditions that may cause death in the near future. Community Health Workers, a home visiting doctor service, a supportive care nurse, and behavioral health specialist engage the population to address a range of biopsychosocial needs with end goal in increasing support in the community and engaging palliative and hospice care when appropriate to prevent hospital readmissions, shorten length of stay, reduce hospital utilization, and decrease overall patient cost with a focus on hospital spend.
This study is looking for the predictors of the survival or rehospitalization of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Participants who are discharged from an acute heart failure hospitalization are enrolled.