View clinical trials related to Microbiome.
Filter by:This study is planned to be recruited in two hospitals in South China, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and Zhongshan Boai Hospital Recruit participants, plan to recruit obstetrics and child health departments in study hospitals, meet inclusion and discharge criteria 1~3 infants, a total of 360, recruited by Pearl River Hospital of Southern Medical University and Zhongshan Boai Hospital 180 people each.
The purpose of the study is to learn how different dietary interventions affect microbiota diversity in pregnant women and the transmission of microbiota to their infants during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum.
This study is designed to study the variations in the microbiome among critically ill patients and the effect of admission to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) at the University of Chicago. Additionally, investigators will examine the downstream clinical effects of dysbiosis in ICU patients and how patients maybe effected long term.
The aim of the study will be to analyze the microbiome in the blood and stomach in patients with intestinal metaplasia (IM) and / or gastric cancer (GC). As far as IM is concerned, it has been found that the incomplete type is related to GC mainly intestinal-type. Studies show differences in the microbiome in patients with IM and in patients with GC, but do not specify whether these differences are related to histological types. Our intention is to further analyze the microbiome based on histological types. Most studies on stomach cancer have focused on the microbiota of gastric microbiota. Recent data have shown that the microbiome of the small intestine, especially the mucosa, can play a key role in the condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Disturbance of the microbiome of the small intestine has been found in celiac disease, chronic liver disease, diabetes and irritable bowel syndrome. However, information on the role of the microbiome in IM remains limited.
The purpose of this study Is to evaluate if a 4 weeks probiotic VSL#3 treatment and a strict LFD for 4 weeks are equally good in treating IBS symptoms in IBS patients with diarrhoea or mixed predominance and further evaluate the long term effect. Hopefully this one year individualized web-based IBS study will generate a fundament that could be used as a treatment in the primary care/sector to IBS patients.This one year study will be carried out based on an eHealth platform ibs.constant-care.com. Patients will self-measure on the web-program the first 4 weeks before randomization. The patients will fill out different questionnaires regarding symptom severity, adherence, stool consistency and frequency, quality of life, disease course type, food registration and weight. Nearly all of the questionnaires are illustrated to the patients in a traffic light manner (Green, Yellow and Red). They will also self-measure Fecal calprotectin on their smart phones and send in fecal samples for microbiome analysis. In this randomized cross over study - 104 IBS patients will be randomized to either a diet low in FODMAPs (fermentable, oligo-, di- and monosaccharides and polyols, LFD) or the probiotic product VSL#3® for 4 weeks. The probiotic group will receive 2 sachets a day (450 billions live bacteria in one sachet) for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks intervention (LFD or VSL#3) non responders, defined as a reduction of less than 50 points in IBS-SSS will after two weeks wash out period be crossed over. IBS patients randomized to LFD and responds to LFD will after a reintroduction counselling with dieticians at North Zealand university hospital after 4 weeks on a strict LFD start reintroducing high FODMAP foods until symptom flare (individual defined as either Yellow or Red, >175 in IBS-SSS). Hereafter they will go on a strict LFD again until symptom remission (IBS-SSS below 175, Green zone) - LFD responders will continue with this procedure for 10 months. IBS patients initially randomized to VSL#3 and are after 4 weeks of intervention characterized as responders will not be offered a LFD. Instead they will self- measure on the web with no intervention after the 4 weeks of VSL#3 treatment. When/if they reach a symptom flare ( again individually defined as either Yellow or Red, >175 point in IBS-SSS) they will be offered another 4 weeks VSL#3 treatment.
Recent advances in neonatal intensive care have dramatically increased the survival rate of extremely premature infants but the number of survivors with severe morbidity and lifelong neurodevelopmental impairment remains high. Perinatal white matter injury is the predominant form of brain injury in premature infants, often leading to adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Intrauterine and neonatal infection and inflammation have been identified as major risk factors of neonatal brain injury. The fragile gut microbiome of premature infants seems to play an important role in health and disease as distortions of the microbiome occur prior to sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Furthermore, the close link of the gut microbiome to neurological and psychiatric diseases in animal models suggests that the microbiome may influence brain maturation and development in preterm infants. Recent studies have underlined the importance of regulatory T cells as well as γδ T cells in brain injury, which can be directly influenced by the gut microbiome. It is therefore likely that an underdeveloped or distorted gut microbiome affects host immune response and may be a risk factor for neurodevelopmental disabilities in extremely premature infants who are already challenged by the unphysiologic early extrauterine environment after premature birth which affects maturation of the gut microbiome and immune system as well as neurophysiological maturation alike. Therefore, the overarching aim of the PreMiBraIn study is to elucidate the role of the gut-immune-brain axis on neonatal brain injury and its impact on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely premature infants. The study cohort will consist of a total of 60 extremely premature infants with a gestational age < 28 weeks and birth weight < 1000 grams. The investigators seek to characterize the orchestrated dynamics of the maturation of the gut microbiome and the subsequent impact on maturation of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms as well as neurophysiological maturation and neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore, the investigators will assess the value of the microbiome as a prognostic indicator for neonatal brain injury as well as short- and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely premature infants. This goal will be achieved by state-of-the-art techniques using 16s rRNA gene sequencing of the gut microbiome, holistic analysis of T cell biology using flow cytometry, whole transcriptome analysis and proteomics as well as neurophysiological measurements (amplitude-integrated EEG, near-infrared spectroscopy, visual evoked potentials) and cranial MRI of extremely premature infants. Short- and long-term neurological outcome will be investigated using Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition at one and two years corrected age, and Kaufmann-Assessment Battery for Children at five years of age. The investigators expect to find microbiome signatures that are predictive for later neurodevelopmental disabilities which may then be used for early screening and intervention and may suggest personalized therapeutic options. The prospects of precision medicine targeting the gut-immune-brain axis in extremely premature infants hold the opportunity to improve the overall outcome of these high-risk patients.