Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This phase III trial compares the effect of adding whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance and memantine to stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery alone in treating patients with cancer that has spread to the brain and come back in other areas of the brain after earlier stereotactic radiosurgery. Hippocampus avoidance during whole-brain radiation therapy decreases the amount of radiation that is delivered to the hippocampus, which is a brain structure that is important for memory. The medicine memantine is also often given with whole brain radiation therapy because it may decrease the risk of side effects of radiation on thinking and memory. Stereotactic radiosurgery delivers a high dose of radiation only to the small areas of cancer in the brain and avoids the surrounding normal brain tissue. Adding whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance and memantine to stereotactic radiosurgery may be effective in shrinking or stabilizing cancer that has spread to the brain and returned in other areas of the brain after receiving stereotactic radiosurgery.


Clinical Trial Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To determine if salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plus whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance (HA-WBRT) in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS prolongs time to neurologic death as compared to salvage SRS alone. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine if salvage SRS + HA-WBRT in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS prolongs overall survival as compared to salvage SRS alone. II. To evaluate if salvage SRS + HA-WBRT in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS prolongs intracranial progression-free survival as compared to salvage SRS alone. III. To evaluate if salvage SRS + HA-WBRT in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS improves brain metastasis velocity at subsequent relapse as compared to salvage SRS alone. IV. To assess perceived difficulties in cognitive abilities, symptom burden and health status after salvage SRS + HA-WBRT, as compared to salvage SRS alone, in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS. V. To compare neurocognitive function outcomes following salvage SRS + HA-WBRT, as compared to salvage SRS alone, in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS. VI. To tabulate and descriptively compare the adverse events associated with the interventions. VII. To tabulate and descriptively compare the number of salvage procedures used to manage recurrent intracranial disease following the interventions. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To collect serum, plasma, and whole blood for translational research analyses. II. To collect baseline and all follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for hippocampal volume, memory center substructures, axial T2 volumes, and quantitative texture analysis. III. To collect baseline and follow-up MR imaging to extract whole brain volume, white matter volume and volume of metastatic disease to correlate with cognitive change at 4 months. IV. To evaluate dose-volume histogram parameters to correlate with radiation toxicity. V. To assess in patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy, if salvage SRS + HA-WBRT in patients with brain metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS improves brain metastasis velocity and/or overall survival at subsequent relapse as compared to salvage SRS. VI. To compare the estimated cost of brain-related therapies and quality-adjusted life years in patients who receive salvage SRS + HA-WBRT, as compared to salvage SRS alone, in patients with metastasis velocity >= 4 new brain metastases/year at time of first or second distant brain failure following upfront SRS. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo HA-WBRT daily (5 times weekly) for 2 weeks for a total of 10 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Within 1 week prior to or following HA-WBRT, patients undergo salvage SRS. Prior to HA-WBRT or no later than the 4th treatment, patients also receive memantine orally (PO) once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. ARM II: Patients undergo salvage SRS. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 2-3 months for at least 1 year. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04588246
Study type Interventional
Source NRG Oncology
Contact
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 3
Start date December 15, 2020
Completion date January 31, 2030

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02224781 - Dabrafenib and Trametinib Followed by Ipilimumab and Nivolumab or Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Followed by Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Treating Patients With Stage III-IV BRAFV600 Melanoma Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT05470283 - Phase I, Open-Label, Study of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Engineered With Membrane Bound IL15 Plus Acetazolamide in Adult Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05388877 - E6201 and Dabrafenib for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Metastases From BRAF V600 Mutated Metastatic Melanoma Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05103891 - Relative Bioavailability of Binimetinib 3 x 15 mg and 45 mg Formulations Phase 1
Completed NCT00414765 - Aldesleukin in Participants With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma or Metastatic Melanoma Phase 4
Completed NCT02857270 - A Study of LY3214996 Administered Alone or in Combination With Other Agents in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Cancer Phase 1
Completed NCT01621490 - PH 1 Biomarker Study of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05779423 - Cryoablation+Ipilimumab+Nivolumab in Melanoma Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04940299 - Tocilizumab, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced Melanoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, or Urothelial Carcinoma Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT02278887 - Study Comparing TIL to Standard Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT02360579 - Study of Lifileucel (LN-144), Autologous Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 2
Terminated NCT02521870 - A Trial of Intratumoral Injections of SD-101 in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma or Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02177110 - A Translational Systems Medicine Approach to Provide Predictive Capacity for Therapy Response in Advanced or Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
Withdrawn NCT01340729 - Open-Label Study of TPI 287 for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01416844 - Study of Immune Responses in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 2
Terminated NCT01468818 - Immunotherapy Using Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 2
Completed NCT00984464 - Study of REOLYSIN® in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Phase 2
Completed NCT00631618 - Clinical Trial of Sutent to Treat Metastatic Melanoma Phase 2
Terminated NCT00571116 - Disulfiram Plus Arsenic Trioxide In Patients With Metastatic Melanoma and at Least One Prior Systemic Therapy Phase 1
Recruiting NCT00226473 - Standard Palliative Care Versus Standard Palliative Care Plus Polychemotherapy in Metastasized Malignant Melanoma Phase 4