View clinical trials related to Mental Health.
Filter by:This study aims to explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating a class-based intervention in three Danish primary schools. The intervention includes class choir among all students in 0 to 3rd grade as part of the regular school schedule.
Partners In Health (PIH), in collaboration with Harvard Medical School, aims to develop and evaluate an SMS-based intervention for Community Health Workers (CHWs) to combat COVID-19 and mental health-related misinformation in Haiti, Rwanda, and Malawi. The study involves three aims: identifying locally relevant misinformation through a card-sorting exercise with CHWs, developing targeted messages through cognitive interviewing, and evaluating the effectiveness of SMS-based educational message dissemination via a randomized controlled trial. The evaluation will assess the impact on public health practices, knowledge and attitudes among CHWs, and knowledge and attitudes among community members.
This study is a field trial where "Komp" is implemented and tested as part of Oslo Municipality's home care services for older adults. Komp is a "one button" communication device designed specifically for older adults who are unfamiliar with or struggle to use conventional digital technologies such as smart phones, computers, or tablets. The aim of the trial is to study the effects of increased social contact with family and care services via Komp. In a randomized design, 300 Komp units will be offered to a sample of older municipal home care service recipients. By comparing the intervention group (who are offered to test Komp for free) with the control group (who receive services as usual), the study will uncover if, on average, users of Komp 1) can live longer at home than non-users, 2) have lesser need of home care services, and 3) are happier, safer, and more socially connected.
US residents who have gastrointestinal issues sign the informed consent form and are screened and enrolled for this study. Participants who are enrolled complete a survey upon enrollment and are randomized into one of three arms. This study is direct to participant and will NOT utilize clinical sites.
The aim of this study is to implement and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a validated integrated multi-component intervention targeting secondary prevention of violence and addressing the mental health needs of women experiencing intimate partner violence.
As ICU mortality has been significantly decreased over the last two decades, the focus has been shifting from short term (such as ICU and hospital mortality) to long-term outcome. This evolution has led to a new entity that has been established in 2012 at a stakeholder conference: the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). It is defined as impairments in physical, cognitive and mental health status arising after critical illness and persisting beyond acute care hospitalisation. As family members of ICU patients may also be affected by mental health impairment, the PICS-F (F for Family) has been introduced simultaneously. It is expected that the COVID-19 pandemic will result in a significant increase of the proportion of patients and relatives suffering PICS and PICS-F, as there is during the COVID-19 related ICU-stay exposure to a high number of risk factors for developing these entities. This Post Intensive Care Syndrome in COVID-19 survivors (PICOVIDS) study is an observational, single-center exploratory follow-up cohort study that aims to get insight into the mental impact of a COVID-19 related ICU stay for COVID-19 ICU survivors and their family members, 18 months after ICU discharge. Specific research questions are: 1. What is the prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and what is the prevalence of these specific disorders in COVID-19 ICU-survivors and their relatives 18 months after ICU-discharge? 2. What are important risk factors for these symptoms and disorders? 3. What is the satisfaction level of patient and caregiver about the ICU care: How did they experience ICU stay?
Randomized controlled trial to determine the best brief suicide prevention intervention for adults and adolescents who screen positive for suicidal ideation or behavior in emergency departments or primary care clinics. Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of two brief suicide prevention interventions (safety planning intervention plus structured phone-based follow-up from a suicide prevention hotline (SPI+), versus safety planning intervention plus caring contacts (CC)) to (a) reduce suicidal ideation and behavior, (b) reduce loneliness, (c) reduce return to care for suicidality, and (d) increase uptake of outpatient mental healthcare services over 12 months among adult and adolescent patients screening positive for suicide in emergency departments (EDs) and primary care clinics. Aim 2: Assess the acceptability of connection and support planning and the safety planning intervention, with or without follow-up among providers and clinical staff in EDs and primary care clinics. Aim 3: Assess the acceptability of SPI+ and SP+CC among adult and adolescent patients.
A bilingual online self-help app - MyJourney - has been developed for individuals faced with an unfulfilled wish for children. The specific aim of this trial is to evaluate the feasibility, defined here as determining whether the intervention itself and the study procedures are appropriate for further evaluation, and how users react to the intervention, which will inform the implementation of a future full scale RCT to evaluate MyJourney's efficacy. This RCT will be a two arm, parallel-group, non-blind feasibility trial with 1:1 allocation to the intervention group (immediate access to MyJourney) or waitlist control group (receives access to MyJourney after 10 weeks). A minimum number of 152 individuals will be enrolled in this study. Once participants have met the eligibility criteria and completed the baseline assessment, they will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the intervention group or the waitlist control group. The sample will be recruited online. Participation in this study will last 10 weeks for the waitlist group and 6 months for the intervention group. Participants in both groups will be invited to complete a baseline assessment (online survey) and a follow-up assessment (online survey) at 10-weeks post baseline. The intervention group will also be invited to complete another follow-up assessment at 6-months post baseline. Assessments will include self-report questionnaires to cover socio-demographic information (baseline only), psychological mediators (mechanisms of change) (baseline and 10-week follow-up), psychological outcome questionnaires (baseline, 10-week and 6-month follow up), and questions about acceptability and feasibility (10-week and 6-month follow up).
This study aims to understand the comparative effectiveness of two PSH models (PB-PSH and SS-PSH) on quality of life and COVID-19 related health behaviors by following for 6 months a cohort of 800 PEH who have been placed in either PB (n=400) or SS (n=400). In a natural observational experiment, participants will complete 6 monthly mobile-based questionnaires exploring quality of life including physical, mental, social, and housing/environmental health, COVID-19 prevention practices (i.e., handwashing, social distancing, face covering), and past-30-day healthcare utilization. A sub-sample of 40 participants living in both PB-PSH and SS-PSH will be qualitatively interviewed longitudinally to help contextualize quantitative findings. Focus groups will also be conducted with providers of PSH and qualitative interviews will be conducted with other key stakeholders to understand perspectives on the challenges of implementing and sustaining COVID-19 related prevention practices while maintaining a continuity of care.
The role of peer support specialists (PSS) has burgeoned in the mental health field. Peer support specialists are individuals with a psychiatric condition who are in recovery and who are employed to provide various kinds of tangible and other supports to individuals with psychiatric conditions, generally in public mental health programs. Partially because of the newness of this role, PSS experience confusion about their role and tasks as well as conflict with other mental health providers who are uncertain about how to utilize PSS effectively in services. This project was designed to bring a coaching service to PSS to assist them to address challenges in their job. The investigators will conduct a randomized control trial to evaluate a novel coaching, Coaching and Advancement for Peer Providers (CAPP). Our hypotheses are that individuals participating in the CAPP intervention will experience a reduction in burnout, role confusion, and intention to leave their job or the field. Participants in CAPP will also experience an increase in job satisfaction, role clarity and organizational commitment.