View clinical trials related to Mental Health Wellness 1.
Filter by:Objectives This study aims to examine the effects of the therapeutic virtual reality (VR) experience in older people with physical disabilities in long-term care facilities (LTCF) in 1) increasing mental well-being, 2) reducing depressive symptoms, 3) reducing loneliness, 4) increasing health-related quality of life, and 5) increasing perceived social support. If this intervention is successful, this study will yield new knowledge about the effects of this innovative intervention. Also, an innovative VR intervention will be available to promote the mental well-being of older residents in LTCF. Trial design This study employs a single-blinded, two-parallel-group (intervention-to-control group ratio=1:1), non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Study setting This study will be conducted in the LTCF. Participants will be recruited from Care & Attention Homes for the Elderly and Nursing Homes under the governance of the Social Welfare Department in Hong Kong. Eligibility criteria Inclusion: 1) Aged 60 years or above; 2) LTCF residents; and 3) Physical disability, defined as the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score of ≤ 90 (i.e., moderately dependent or worse). Exclusion: 1) Probably dementia, as defined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of < 20, 2) Severe visual impairment, as defined by a lens-corrected visual acuity score of < 6/60, 3) Severe hearing impairment, as defined by failed whispered voice test, 4) Bilateral upper limb paralysis, as defined by the Medical Research Council Muscle Power Scale of < 4, or 5) Participated in any VR activities in the past six months or concurrently. Consent All participants will be asked to give their written informed consent to participate in the proposed study. Groups Participants allocated to the intervention group will participate in the 6-week VR experience programme. Participants allocated to the control will receive the usual care provided by the LTCF, such as personal care, regular basic medical and nursing care, and social support, as committed by the Social Welfare Department. The participants allocated to the intervention group receive the same usual care provided by the LTCF. The research team does not interfere with the services provided to the participants in either group. Outcomes Demographic data including age, gender, level of education, number of chronic illnesses, length of stay in the LTCF, and experience of participation in VR activities will be collected. Outcomes include mental well-being, depressive symptoms, loneliness, health-related quality of life, and perceived social support. Participant timeline Potential participants will be recruited in the phase of Enrolment, in which the eligibility screen and informed consent will be implemented. Then, in the phase of the Pre-treatment Assessment (i.e., T0,), demographic and outcome data will be collected. Subsequently, in the phase allocation, participants will be randomly allocated to either the therapeutic virtual reality experience group or the control group. Then, interventions will be implemented. In the phase of the Post-treatment Assessment (i.e., T1), outcome data will be collected once again. Analysis methods Demographic and outcome data collected at baseline will be reported either as means with standard deviation or as frequencies with percentages according to their levels of measurement as a whole sample and by groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) will be employed to separately test the hypothesis on the five outcomes as dependent variables (i.e., mental well-being, depressive symptoms, loneliness, health-related quality of life, perceived social support), The independent variables will be the same across all GEEs: group (two categories: intervention and control groups), timepoint (two categories: T0 and T1), and group x timepoint. The primary interpretation of the results will be based on the intention-to-treat analysis without adjusting for covariates. The level of significance will be set at 0.05. Missing data will be managed following a practical guide with flowcharts using various methods (e.g., multiple imputation, single imputation, or no imputation).
The purpose of this trial is to compare the impact of a fruit and vegetable access plus nutrition education intervention to a nutrition education-only control on the health, well-being, and food security of early care and education (ECE) professionals. The intervention, called Nurturing Healthy Teachers, combines strategies from two evidence-based programs - Create Healthy Futures (CHF) and Brighter Bites (BB).
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus represents threats to global health and economy. The high pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 extent that the Mexican government declared a national health emergency, agreeing to take extraordinary measures such as the suspension of non-essential work, including the suspension of academic activities at all levels, in order to minimize the dispersion and transmission of the virus and its consequences. Several previously reported quarantine evaluations have shown that psychological stress reactions can arise from the experience of physical and social isolation, so the current global threat of isolation has shaken the usual practices of the general population, including young people, and resulting in the modification of their academic, labor and social dynamics. The usual behavior in this phenomenon establishes that greater social isolation is associated with less satisfaction with life, higher levels of depression and lower levels of psychological well-being or performance as well as changes in diet. Understanding the factors related to coping with COVID-19 is essential to issue guidance on health in the student population, for that, the present proposal intends to evaluate changes in health parameters derived from the resumption of academic activities in person for a year in university students of health sciences area.
Using a hybrid type III trial with a cluster randomized design, the digital peer support training for adolescent mental health protocol aims to implement a multidisciplinary program, which translates theoretical and empirical work from implementation science, communication science, and developmental psychology, to train adolescents in effective digital peer support for mental well-being. With the lack of theoretically driven and empirically grounded program to train adolescents in providing digital peer support for mental well-being, this study involves the design and implementation of such a program using that addressed four research questions: (a) what is digital peer support for adolescents, (b) how do peers provide effective peer support online, (c) how do we implement digital peer support training among adolescents, (d) what are the facilitators and barriers in training adolescents to provide effective peer support, and (e) how do we scale up and sustain digital peer support training among adolescents for far-reaching and long-lasting effectiveness?
OBJECTIVES: 1. To evaluate the impact of an intervention based on collaborative nursing care in terms of the changes produced in the recovery process, in positive mental health and in the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship among users of mental health day hospitals. To explore the changes produced in the recovery process of users who receive collaborative nursing care through the co-design and implementation of group activities. DESIGN: A sequential and transformative mixed methods design is proposed. METHODS. The study is structured in three phases. In phase one (baseline) and phase three (follow-up), quantitative data will be collected from patients at a mental health day hospitals based on a two-armed, parallel-design, non-randomized trial. In phase two, two groups will be established: an intervention group (GI) in which the intervention based on collaborative nursing care will be carried out through the co-design and implementation of activities through Participatory Action Research, and a control group (CG) in which the usual care dynamics will be continued. All the users of three mental health day hospitals who agree to participate in the study will be studied consecutively until the necessary sample size is reached. The outcomes used to evaluate the impact of the intervention will be the stage of the recovery process, the quality of the therapeutic relationship and the patient's level of positive mental health. DISCUSSION: Very few collaborative nursing care interventions have been studied and shown to be effective in the context of the paradigm shift toward recovery in mental health nursing. IMPACT: Understanding the changes produced in the recovery process, as well as in the quality of the therapeutic relationship and in the maintenance and/or increase of the levels of positive mental health of people with mental health problems, can contribute to the design and implementation of new methodologies to offer effective and person- centered care.
The Patient Empowerment Study is an observational longitudinal study among adults with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). The scope of this study is to better understand how a patient's DFU disease process and usage of the Podimetrics System can impact patient health-related quality of life. Health-related quality of life will be measured by both the generic 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and the ulcer-specific Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale Short Form (DFS-SF) questionnaire.
The Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia makes several changes in daily living. The Indonesian government suggests that everyone should stay at home by implements the work from home and school from home. Therefore, the issues related with Covid-19 are also worrying such as death because of the infection, virus transmission, doing everything from home such as Friday praying for Moslem, Sunday service at home, etc. People is anxious whenever meeting people because they are not really understand whether people is infected or not. Therefore, this study tries to identify the impact of Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia towards mental well-being of the community.
The identification and treatment of the disorders connected to the perinatal period has traditionally catalyzed the researchers' attention. Nevertheless, since the World Health Organization has recently coined the concept of positive pregnancy experience, which includes not only treatment of diseases, but also health education, and health promotion, research on antenatal care has expanded to a salutogenic perspective. In the wake of this perspective, a growing number of research have been examining the potential benefits of positive aspects and protective factors on maternal prenatal well-bein. This salutogenic perspective is supported by the emerging field of Positive Psychology. Evidence from Positive Psychology studies has shown that it is possible to build and enhance personal strengths, sense of meaning and positive feelings by practicing some brief positive exercises, called Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs). Recently, researchers have started to investigate the effects of a PPI on women's prenatal well-being, reporting promising findings in terms of potential direct effects of the positive intervention on women's prenatal stress in comparison to a treatment-as-usual control condition. In the past decade, many web-based delivered interventions have been designed and documented to be effective for the promotion of mental health and for the prevention and treatment of different disorders. Indeed, recent systematic reviews provides preliminary evidence that web-based interventions can be a promising and advisable form of intervention during the perinatal period. PPIs have been translated also in the online format. Preliminary evidence suggests that online positive psychology interventions can effectively enhance well-being and reduce depressive symptoms. The research team have developed the protocol for a web-based positive psychology programme addressed to promote and enhance women's prenatal well-being. This intervention programme will last five weeks and will be completely self-administered. It is intend to study the effect of the intervention on levels of mental well-being, depression, pregnancy related anxiety and other relevant variables, and the results will be compared to a waiting list control group.