View clinical trials related to Lymphoma.
Filter by:A retrospective, non-interventional cohort study was used to address the study objectives. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare reimbursement costs associated with chimeric antigen receptor modified T cell (CAR-T) therapy among patients with DLBCL.
This study focuses on the population of malignant lymphoma patients who are also in clinical research. Through a real world cross-sectional survey of infection and death risk during the COVID-19 pandemic in Guangzhou from December 2022 to January 2023, this study aims to clarify the risk, level and mortality of lymphoma patients infected with COVID-19 during their clinical research, and provide necessary research data for Chinese lymphoma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic,
The proposed research aims to compare between BeEAM standard regimen and CEM as conditioning regimen in lymphoma patients in safety profile& toxicity, infections (Febrile neutropenia) during transplant, time to engraftment (recovery not neutropenic), Length of stay at hospital, time to relapse, and other complications.
This is a non-interventional, retrospective cohort study using the Flatiron Health Research Database (FHRD) and data from the single-arm phase II JULIET clinical trial (NCT02445248).
This is a study protocol to determine whether it is feasible to support parents of children with blood cancers by providing information over an online learning platform. This study will be conducted in Malaysia. An online learning platform will be used to provide information relevant to parents who care for children diagnosed with leukemia or lymphoma. The use of this platform will be compared with current usual care, where only verbal discussions and ad hoc caregiver training is provided to support these parents, based on the clinician's judgement. Participants knowledge and confidence level in caregiving as well as coping will be compared between the two groups. To determine the feasibility of this method of information support, the researchers will also obtain feedback from participants who used the online learning platform and determine whether there are many who drop out from using it. The findings will determine whether use of online learning platform is suitable to deliver information support for parents, in view of currently limited resources for supportive care in childhood cancer care in Malaysia.
The progressive improvement of lymphoma treatment has led to an important prolongation of patient survival and life expectancy. Therefore, the principal International scientific societies of oncology, recommend Long-term Survivors of Lymphoma to join fertility programs. Specifically, fertile age patients should be assisted by a multi-disciplinary team including specialists dedicated to fertility preservation in oncology, in order to support the completion of the reproductive project. In general population, the use of Inositol was spready considered an effectives choice to contrast ovarian dysfunction with consequently improvement of reproductive outcomes, so it may represent an adjuvant strategy for this purpose. Therefore, the investigators conducted a pilot study to evaluate the potentialities of this nutritional supplement with the aim to optimize the reproductive function in Long-term Survivors of Lymphoma. Despite the limited number of cases and short observational time, this pilot investigation could represent a potential cornerstone for further insights, discussions, and applications
To assess the blood levels of hypericin and any electrocardiogram (ECG) changes during 8 weeks of HyBryte (topical hypericin ointment) photodynamic therapy.
A retrospective, non-interventional cohort study was used to address the study objectives. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and healthcare reimbursement costs associated with CAR-T therapy among patients with r/r Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).
Primary Objective: To evaluate objective response rate (ORR) in adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) who receive systemic treatment after at least 2 prior systemic therapies in the real-world setting according to Lugano classification of malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2014) and as assessed by independent central review Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the following outcomes in adult patients with r/r DLBCL who are treated with currently available therapies in the real-world setting: 1. ORR according to Lugano classification and as assessed by treating physician evaluation 2. Complete Response (CR) rate according to Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 3. Progression Free Survival (PFS) according to Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 4. Overall Survival (OS) 5. Duration of response (DOR) according to Lugano classification and as assessed by - Independent central review and - Treating physician evaluation 6. Disease control rate (DCR) according to Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central reviewed - Treating physician evaluation 7. Time to next treatment (TTNT)
Primary Objective: To evaluate objective response rate (ORR) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL) grade 1-3a who are treated with currently available therapies in the real-world setting according to Lugano classification (Cheson, 2014) of malignant lymphoma and as assessed by independent central review. Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the following outcomes in adult patients with r/r FL grade 1-3a who are treated with currently available systemic therapies in the real-world setting: 1. Objective response rate (ORR) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by treating physician evaluation 2. Complete response (CR) rate according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 3. Progression-free survival (PFS) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 4. Overall survival (OS) 5. Duration of response (DOR) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 6. Disease control rate (DCR) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 7. Time to next treatment (TTNT) 8. Histological transformation (HT)