View clinical trials related to Lymphedema.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to investigate and compare responsiveness of current lymphedema assessment scales validated in Turkish.
study patients; axillary node negative breast cancer female, 74 patients randomly allocated in two groups each 37 patients , group I , where axillary reverse mapping(ARM) +ve nodes were preserved and axillary lymph node dissection completed.and group II where axillary reverse mapping +ve nodes were taken with axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) primary outcome is histopathological examination of a ARM +ve lymph nodes and volume measurements of the ipsilateral arm for development of lymphedema at 6 ,12 , and 24 months
The aim of this research is to study the influence of stochastic modulated vibrations on the autonomic nervous system of breast cancer patients during radiation therapy
Researchers are collecting information, saliva, blood and tissue from subjects with lymphedema to store for future research.
Subjects with lower extremity lymphedema will be prescribed, per standard of care, to either Flexitouch Plus with conservative care or conservative care only and be followed for 12 months.
OBJECTIVE: To find out the effectiveness of early application of Manual Lymph Drainage in the prevention of upper limb lymphedema after breast surgery and axillary lymphadenectomy in women with breast cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled and single blinded clinical trial. Five years duration. Patients were randomly assigned to one of these groups: Experimental group: Manual Lymph Drainage + training in means of prevention; Control group: just training in means of prevention. In both groups several physical therapy assessments were undertaken: 1st before surgery; 2nd 3 month after surgery; 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th after 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. SUBJECTS: Women with breast cancer treated with breast surgery including axillary lymphadenectomy in Provincial Hospital of Toledo, provided that there is no contraindication for manual lymph drainage, and after reading, understanding and freely signing an informed consent form. SAMPLE SIZE: A total of 150 subjects were included in the study (57 subjects in experimental group and 93 in control group), assuming a 20% of drop-outs and at least 25% reduction, with a statistical power of 75%. DATA ANALYSIS: To find out the effectiveness of intervention the investigators will compare the rate of lymphedema in both groups by means of a logistic regression analysis, in which the main factor is the intervention group. Other factors aimed to control the effect of the intervention will also be included. In order to compare the rate of appearance of lymphedema in both groups, a survival analysis will also be included.
Aim: The study was performed to examine effects of Health Belief Model based nursing interventions given at home visits on prevention of lymphedema in women having breast surgery. Methods: The study had an experimental design. 72 women receiving radiotherapy after breast surgery, of whom 37 formed the intervention group and 35 formed the control group. The study had an experimental design. Data were collected with a personal information questionnaire, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Q-DASH), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life for Breast Cancer 23 (EORTC QLQ-BR23), Strategies Used by Patients to Promote Health (SUPPH), Arm Circumference Form at three home visits at three-month intervals. Hypotheses of the study 1. Extremity function restrictions will be lower in the intervention group than in the control group. 2. Self-efficacy levels will be higher in the intervention group than in the control group. 3. Functions improving the quality of life will be higher in the intervention group than in the control group. 4. There will be fewer symptoms reducing the quality of life in the intervention group than in the control group. 5. The incidence of lymphedema will be lower in the intervention group than in the control group. 6. The mean cost of the intervention group at home visits, will be lower than in the control group. What does this paper contribute? - Nurses can play an effective role in enabling women undergoing breast surgery to acquire behavior of lymphedema prevention. This may reduce treatment costs. - Future research should evaluate collaborative models of care in general practice aimed at improving lymphedema prevention for women undergoing breast surgery. - Policymakers should consider introducing funding measures for breast cancer survivors by nurses.
Following surgery and treatment for breast cancer, many patients experience swelling of lymph nodes (lymphedema) or accumulation of fluid (seroma) that can cause pain, restrict movement, and reduce quality of life. Current treatments include massage, pressure dressings, and drainage, but these are often ineffective and do not last. Physical activity, in particular swimming, has been linked to improvement in lymphedema/seroma symptoms, but more research is required to determine whether or not this type of treatment is effective.
The objective of the study is to demonstrate equivalency in treatment effect, as determined by objective measurements, between the modified therapy cycle software and the FDA-cleared Flexitouch therapy cycle software.
This will be a prospective, randomized controlled study of ~60 adult patients who have undergone a laryngectomy, neck dissection, maxillectomy or mandibulectomy surgical procedure for the treatment of head and neck cancer at Our Lady of the Lake Hospital and have been referred by their physician for evaluation of head and neck lymphedema while serving as an inpatient. Consenting patients will be evaluated by certified speech and language pathologists trained to ascertain lymphedema severity using a series of visual and tangible measurements immediately following surgery and randomized into two cohorts, one receiving the complete decongestive therapy regimen and the other not receiving this specific combination treatment for their edema. Facial and neck measurements will be taken at baseline following surgery and at several points prior to and at discharge as well as at the 2 week follow up visit to the clinic. Measurements and overall change/reduction in edema will be compared between the cohorts.