View clinical trials related to Laparotomy.
Filter by:PENGUIN is a pragmatic multi-center trial investigating the effects of pre-operative mouthwash and perioperative oxygen on the incidences of pneumonia and surgical site infection (SSI) following major abdominal surgery. Patients will be recruited from low and middle income countries and randomly assigned to a trial treatment arms: a) pre-operative chlorhexidine mouthwash and 80-100% FiO2; b) no pre-operative mouthwash and 80-100% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2); c) pre-operative chlorhexidine mouthwash and 21- 30% FiO2; or d) no pre-operative mouthwash and 21-30% FiO2.
Brief study Introduction/background Laparostomy is defined is a surgical procedure in which abdominal cavity is opened and left opened deliberately because of difficult primary closure or when primary closure is avoided due to severe intraabdominal sepsis, trauma and risk of abdominal compartment syndrome. Patients and methods Retrospective Proforma based study conducted from 1st May 2014-31st May 2018. All patients admitted through emergency diagnosed clinically with peritonitis, intraabdominal sepsis and abdominal trauma managed with laparotomy and laparostomy were included in the study. On laparotomy primary cause was identified and controlled with damaged control surgery to save the lives and abdomen was left open with temporary abdominal wall cover of urine bag stitched all around either with skin or external oblique aponeurosis temporarily for second relook laparotomy after 24-48 hours. On second relook of abdomen haemostasis secured and abdomen was washed with normal saline, any missed pathology identified and controlled and abdomen was closed in some patient when there was no need to recheck the abdomen while in other patients abdominal content were covered again temporarily with urine bag. All patients were managed by the team of surgery and ICU. Finally abdomen was closed by deep tension suture DTS or direct layered closure of abdominal wall.
The TAP block, first described by Rafi in 2001, is comprised of deposition of a local anesthetic into the anatomical plane between the internal oblique and transverses abdominis muscles, where thess thoracoabdominal nerves (T6-L1) contribute to the main sensory supply of the skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum of the anterior abdominal wall. These nerves branch and communicate extensively with each other in the TAP . Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described interfascial block in which the local anaesthectic is placed over or below the plane of the erector spinae muscle, near where the spinal nerves come out from the spine before they start to divide. Some publications have shown its effectiveness in treating thoracic and abdominal postoperative pain. Postoperative pain is the major obstacle for early postoperative ambulation and increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, respiratory complications and prolongs the hospital stay. Parietal pain is the chief component of postoperative pain after abdominal surgeries. Large doses of opioids are required to mitigate this pain, but they are poorly tolerated. Multimodal analgesia is effective in handling postoperative pain and in attenuating the side effects of large doses of a single analgesic .
This is a multisite randomized control proof-of-concept trial to evaluate the safety of Duramesh laparotomy closure in the trauma and emergency laparotomy setting. The study will be performed at University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. One hundred (100) patients will be randomized (2:1) to Duramesh laparotomy closure versus conventional suture closure. After the patient has been confirmed to be a candidate for the trial, randomization will be performed in the operating room upon completion of the index abdominal procedure. Duramesh will be provided for patients assigned to the Duramesh treatment arm. Patients will be followed for 1 year following laparotomy closure at follow-up intervals of 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
This cohort study is to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Sixty patients with LACC (FIGO 2009 stage IB2 to IIB) will be enrolled. After informed consents, they would accept the imaging evaluation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). After excluding cases of distant metastasis, they will accept two cycles of NAC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2, on day 1, once for three weeks). Then a second MRI is performed to evaluate the imaging response. For patients achieving objective response, radical hysterectomy (RH, via laparoscopy or laparotomy) and an evaluation of pathologic response are performed. For patients without objective imaging response, the choice of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radical hysterectomy will be discussed. After RH, adjuvant therapy will be given according to the RH pathologic results. The primary objectives consist of (1) the objective imaging response after NAC; (2) the objective pathologic response after RH. The secondary objectives consist of (1) disease-free survival and overall survival after various therapy modalities; (2) severe adverse effects of NAC; (3) the effects of NAC on the surgical outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to determine if using a different type of injection of local anesthestic (pain medicine) in between the muscle layers of the abdominal wall (called a quadratus lumborum block) will improve pain control and be easier to manage after surgery than the current standard of care epidural (spinal injection) pain relief for patients undergoing laparoscopy colectomy.
This multi-center, randomized controlled study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between Chinese uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (laparotomy and laparoscopy) for radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy, which is the primary study objective. All patients with uterine cervical cancer of FIGO stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 and IB1 will be included and randomized into two groups: laparotomy and laparoscopy groups for radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. Secondary study objectives include: patterns of recurrence, treatment-associated morbidity (6 months from surgery), cost-effectiveness, pelvic floor function, and quality of life.
This multi-center longitudinal study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy), which is the primary study objective. All clinical and pathological data would be retracted from case reviews, and all survival data would be reached by clinic, telephone and mail follow-up. This study also would analyze the impact on survival outcomes of other factors, including nerve-sparing techniques, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and infection of human papillomavirus. The predictive effects of different following protocol and imaging plans will be also compared. Last, the influences of surgical routes on the fertility outcomes (pregnancy and its complications) and the ovarian reserve are important secondary study objectives.
The main goal of ERAS is to enhance the recovery of patients, and this has secondary effects, such reduced length of hospital stay, minimal postoperative complications and lessen readmission rates. ERAS protocols have been shown to be feasible and safe across the world. Although it has been shown to be effective in the developed settings and can potentially reduce the length of hospital stay, and the cost of healthcare in the perioperative period. The multimodal program of ERAS has been less implemented in the low and middle income African countries. Studies done outside Uganda (Egypt and South Africa) have demonstrated that ERAS program can be feasible and yields favorable outcomes in patients.
The objective of the study is to handle patients with the need for an acute laparotomy according to a standardised perioperative protocol and to document the measurement as they are performed (i.e. adherence to the protocol) and to measure the outcome with regard to both short- (30 days) and long-term (3 and 12 months) mortality. Several secondary endpoints will be measured, such as: hospital stay, length of stay at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), readmission to ICU and surgical complications according to the Clavien-Dindo score. These results will then be compared to published rates of mortality from the literature and to similar outcomes for a cohort of all patients operated at NÄL on the same indication the years prior to the project/study.