View clinical trials related to Laparotomy.
Filter by:A laparotomy is a surgical technique, the increasing rate of this surgical interventions and the subsequent need to evaluate the post-surgical recovery and rehabilitation process comprehensively. This study aims to provide essential insights into the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of such tests, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about patient recovery progress and the optimization of rehabilitation protocols.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of early, supplementary parenteral nutrition following emergency laparotomy. Currently, parenteral nutrition is used in postoperative patients if or when oral or enteral nutrition is not feasible. However, little data exists on the optimal timing of parenteral nutrition. Oral and enteral nutrition is encouraged. Participants will randomized on the second postoperative day if their calorie intake (oral + enteral) is below 30% of the calculated requirement. Patients will be randomized to early (postoperative day 2) or postponed (postoperative day 5) start of parenteral nutrition. The combined oral + enteral + parenteral calorie target is 70-80% of the calculated requirement. Participants in the postponed group will be re-assessed on postoperative day 5, and if their calorie intake is less than 50% parenteral nutrition will be administered. The intervention will continue until oral + enteral intake is at least 70% of the calculated requirement or the participant is at his/her habitual intake.
The goal of this single arm intervention study is to investigate the safety and performance of a suturing device for closure of the midline incision after open abdominal surgery. The study population consists of 38 patients selected for open abdominal procedures for malignant and benign colorectal disease. The main question it aims to answer is: • If the device facilitates a Suture-Length to Wound-Length (SL/WL) ratio of 4:1 Participants laparotomy wound will be closed with the device at the end of the operation and closure related data as closure time and SL/WL ratio will be calculated. The wound will be assessed for infection during the postoperative stay and the chart will be reviewed for wound dehiscence and wound infection.
Pain control after surgery is a crucial component of postoperative recovery. Thus, in open abdominal surgery, the use of TEA (Thoracic epidural analgesia) has become a gold standard. However, analgesia may still remain a challenge, especially in patients with large incision abdominal incisions. To address this problem, the use of the PIEB (Programmed intermittent epidural bolus) mode has been proposed, because it offers a better spread of the epidural medication. Only a few studies have evaluated the superiority of this PIEB mode in open abdominal surgery, yielding conflicting results. However, PIEB showed to be at least as effective in controlling pain as CEI, and clinical experience shows that it can be a valuable tool, especially in patients with a large laparotomy incision. However, the optimal dosage of the PIEB mode has never been determined, Furthermore, it is known whether men and women have the same dosage needs to achieve adequate analgesia since most studies have failed to account for sex-based differences in postoperative analgesia. Hence, the main objective of this study will be to determine the optimal volume dose of the PIEB delivered at a fixed interval of 60 min in patients undergoing surgery using a large midline laparotomy incision. The optimal dose for male and female patients will be determined separately by evaluating men and women in two independent groups. We hypothesize that the optimal dose of the PIEB that will provide effective analgesia in 90% of patients on the first postoperative day will range between 5 and 10 mL, for both groups. The primary outcome in both groups is successful analgesia. It is defined as a requirement of 5 or less patient-controlled epidural boluses between 8 AM and 8 PM on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of motor block and hypotension, comparison of the level of sensory block according to group, comparison of patient satisfaction according to group and comparison of Quality of Recovery-15 score at 48h post-op according to group.
The REBUILD Study is a first-in-human evaluation of the safety and performance of REBUILD Bioabsorbable.
Randomized controlled trial (1:1) in two parallel groups, monocentric, open-label, comparing two locoregional anesthesia (LRA) techniques as integral parts of multimodal analgesia: the control group will benefit from epidural anesthesia, while the experimental group will benefit from bilateral placement of catheters in the sheath of the rectus abdominis muscles.
PENGUIN is a pragmatic multi-center trial investigating the effects of pre-operative mouthwash and perioperative oxygen on the incidences of pneumonia and surgical site infection (SSI) following major abdominal surgery. Patients will be recruited from low and middle income countries and randomly assigned to a trial treatment arms: a) pre-operative chlorhexidine mouthwash and 80-100% FiO2; b) no pre-operative mouthwash and 80-100% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2); c) pre-operative chlorhexidine mouthwash and 21- 30% FiO2; or d) no pre-operative mouthwash and 21-30% FiO2.
This cohort study is to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Sixty patients with LACC (FIGO 2009 stage IB2 to IIB) will be enrolled. After informed consents, they would accept the imaging evaluation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). After excluding cases of distant metastasis, they will accept two cycles of NAC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and cisplatin 70 mg/m2, on day 1, once for three weeks). Then a second MRI is performed to evaluate the imaging response. For patients achieving objective response, radical hysterectomy (RH, via laparoscopy or laparotomy) and an evaluation of pathologic response are performed. For patients without objective imaging response, the choice of concurrent chemoradiotherapy or radical hysterectomy will be discussed. After RH, adjuvant therapy will be given according to the RH pathologic results. The primary objectives consist of (1) the objective imaging response after NAC; (2) the objective pathologic response after RH. The secondary objectives consist of (1) disease-free survival and overall survival after various therapy modalities; (2) severe adverse effects of NAC; (3) the effects of NAC on the surgical outcomes.
This multi-center, randomized controlled study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between Chinese uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (laparotomy and laparoscopy) for radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy, which is the primary study objective. All patients with uterine cervical cancer of FIGO stage IA1 (with lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 and IB1 will be included and randomized into two groups: laparotomy and laparoscopy groups for radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. Secondary study objectives include: patterns of recurrence, treatment-associated morbidity (6 months from surgery), cost-effectiveness, pelvic floor function, and quality of life.
This multi-center longitudinal study aims to compare the survival outcomes (including overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival between uterine cervical patients receiving different surgical routes (vaginal, laparotomy and laparoscopy), which is the primary study objective. All clinical and pathological data would be retracted from case reviews, and all survival data would be reached by clinic, telephone and mail follow-up. This study also would analyze the impact on survival outcomes of other factors, including nerve-sparing techniques, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and infection of human papillomavirus. The predictive effects of different following protocol and imaging plans will be also compared. Last, the influences of surgical routes on the fertility outcomes (pregnancy and its complications) and the ovarian reserve are important secondary study objectives.