View clinical trials related to Laparotomy.
Filter by:A laparotomy is a surgical technique, the increasing rate of this surgical interventions and the subsequent need to evaluate the post-surgical recovery and rehabilitation process comprehensively. This study aims to provide essential insights into the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of such tests, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about patient recovery progress and the optimization of rehabilitation protocols.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of early, supplementary parenteral nutrition following emergency laparotomy. Currently, parenteral nutrition is used in postoperative patients if or when oral or enteral nutrition is not feasible. However, little data exists on the optimal timing of parenteral nutrition. Oral and enteral nutrition is encouraged. Participants will randomized on the second postoperative day if their calorie intake (oral + enteral) is below 30% of the calculated requirement. Patients will be randomized to early (postoperative day 2) or postponed (postoperative day 5) start of parenteral nutrition. The combined oral + enteral + parenteral calorie target is 70-80% of the calculated requirement. Participants in the postponed group will be re-assessed on postoperative day 5, and if their calorie intake is less than 50% parenteral nutrition will be administered. The intervention will continue until oral + enteral intake is at least 70% of the calculated requirement or the participant is at his/her habitual intake.
This randomized control trial aims to compare the efficacy of triclosan-coated barbed suture (TCB) versus conventional non-barbed polydioxanone (PDS) suture in the closure of the abdominal fascia after emergency exploratory laparotomy. The study addresses the common complications of incisional surgical site infections (SSI) and fascial dehiscence (FD) following emergency exploratory laparotomy. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of triclosan-coated barbed suture and conventional non-barbed suture in reducing the rates of incisional SSI and FD within 30 days postoperatively. The study population comprises adult patients undergoing emergent laparotomy for traumatic injuries or acute intraabdominal pathology. This prospective, single-blinded randomized control trial will be conducted at Los Angeles General Medical Center. Patients will be randomized to receive either triclosan-coated barbed suture or conventional non-barbed suture for abdominal fascial closure, with a standard closure technique employed. Patients will be followed up for 30 days postoperatively to monitor surgical site infections, fascial dehiscence, and other outcomes. Statistical analysis will be conducted to compare outcomes between the study arms, assessing the efficacy of triclosan-coated barbed suture in reducing the incidence of SSI and FD, along with secondary outcomes.
The goal of this single arm intervention study is to investigate the safety and performance of a suturing device for closure of the midline incision after open abdominal surgery. The study population consists of 38 patients selected for open abdominal procedures for malignant and benign colorectal disease. The main question it aims to answer is: • If the device facilitates a Suture-Length to Wound-Length (SL/WL) ratio of 4:1 Participants laparotomy wound will be closed with the device at the end of the operation and closure related data as closure time and SL/WL ratio will be calculated. The wound will be assessed for infection during the postoperative stay and the chart will be reviewed for wound dehiscence and wound infection.
Pain control after surgery is a crucial component of postoperative recovery. Thus, in open abdominal surgery, the use of TEA (Thoracic epidural analgesia) has become a gold standard. However, analgesia may still remain a challenge, especially in patients with large incision abdominal incisions. To address this problem, the use of the PIEB (Programmed intermittent epidural bolus) mode has been proposed, because it offers a better spread of the epidural medication. Only a few studies have evaluated the superiority of this PIEB mode in open abdominal surgery, yielding conflicting results. However, PIEB showed to be at least as effective in controlling pain as CEI, and clinical experience shows that it can be a valuable tool, especially in patients with a large laparotomy incision. However, the optimal dosage of the PIEB mode has never been determined, Furthermore, it is known whether men and women have the same dosage needs to achieve adequate analgesia since most studies have failed to account for sex-based differences in postoperative analgesia. Hence, the main objective of this study will be to determine the optimal volume dose of the PIEB delivered at a fixed interval of 60 min in patients undergoing surgery using a large midline laparotomy incision. The optimal dose for male and female patients will be determined separately by evaluating men and women in two independent groups. We hypothesize that the optimal dose of the PIEB that will provide effective analgesia in 90% of patients on the first postoperative day will range between 5 and 10 mL, for both groups. The primary outcome in both groups is successful analgesia. It is defined as a requirement of 5 or less patient-controlled epidural boluses between 8 AM and 8 PM on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of motor block and hypotension, comparison of the level of sensory block according to group, comparison of patient satisfaction according to group and comparison of Quality of Recovery-15 score at 48h post-op according to group.
The REBUILD Study is a first-in-human evaluation of the safety and performance of REBUILD Bioabsorbable.
Randomized controlled trial (1:1) in two parallel groups, monocentric, open-label, comparing two locoregional anesthesia (LRA) techniques as integral parts of multimodal analgesia: the control group will benefit from epidural anesthesia, while the experimental group will benefit from bilateral placement of catheters in the sheath of the rectus abdominis muscles.
For several years, open abdomen with temporary abdominal closure using Negative Pressure Therapy (OA/NPT) has become one of the leading strategies to treat or prevent intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill surgical patients after a wide range of complex abdominal injuries and conditions. According to current practice, piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is widely used as part of empirical combined antibiotic therapy to treat severe abdominal infections in the critically ill patients. On the other hand, little is known about the impact of OA/NPT on antibiotics pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and the optimal dosing regimens in this population remain unclear. As PTZ is a small hydrophilic molecule with a very low level of protein binding, invesitigators hypothesized that OA/NPT should lead to significant changes in volume of distribution (Vd) and/or drug clearance (CL The main objective of this study was to assess the incidence of underdosing and the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in critically ill patients with OA/NPT. The secondary objective was to assess the appropriateness of recommended regimens for empirical minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) coverage.
The effects of anesthesia and surgery can lead to stress responses that result in hormonal and metabolic changes in the body. The immune system and the nervous system communicate both ways, and it was found that nociception and proinflammatory cytokines play a joint regulatory role, i.e., increased production of proinflammatory cytokines can worsen the pain. Major surgery can trigger the release of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α.
Anesthesia records for patients anesthetized with target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil will be matched with patients anesthezied with manyally controlled infusion. The aim of the study is to verify differences in time to extubation and amount of drugs used. anesthetize