View clinical trials related to Portal Hypertension.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to assess the non-inferiority of the intraparenchymal portal vein covered stent in terms of safety and efficacy for managing portal hypertension and its related complications, in comparison to the currently available TIPS Covered Stent System by GORE.
The objective of this observational study is to investigate and validate the utility of the Sound Touch Viscoelastography(STVi) technique in patients with liver cirrhosis for noninvasive prediction of Portal hypertension (PH). The primary research questions it seeks to address are as follows: - What is the correlation between the liver STVi index and Portal Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG)? - Is STVi an available tool to non-invasively predict PH in patients with liver cirrhosis? And the effectiveness and practicality of STVi will be validated. - To establish a predictive model for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension (CSPH) utilizing liver STVi index as the primary indicator. The HVPG is considered as the gold standard in our study and STVi was employed to quantify the STVi index of the liver in patients with liver cirrhosis. Researchers will compare the two patients groups, HVPG≥10 mmHg and HVPG<10 mmHg, to see the usage of STVi in the noninvasive prediction of PH.
A minimally invasive procedure to directly assess portal pressure gradient under endoscopic ultrasound guidance (EUS-PPG) has become available and initial data have proved the technique to be safe. Aims of our proposal are: (i) to assess performance of EUS-PPG as compared to HVPG in evaluating hemodynamic response to non selective betablockers (NSBBs) in a large cohort of patients with CSPH;(ii) identification of markers of hemodynamic response(iii) identification of factors potentially affecting the accuracy of PPG measurement.
A total of fifty-five (55) patients with liver cirrhosis will be enrolled in this study to produce and validate dedicated Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI acquisition protocols. The specific hypotheses include: - Ga-PSMA PET/MRI may allow robust and reproducible noninvasive in vivo quantitation of hepatic macro and microhemodynamics in cirrhotic patients - Dedicated simultaneously acquired DWI sequences might quantitate liver fibrosis and improve hemodynamic quantitation. - Ga-PSMA PET/MRI may allow noninvasive and reproducible quantitation of portal venous hypertension and predict its evolution, as well as response to treatments - Ga-PSMA PET/MRI may improve noninvasive and reproducible qualitative and quantitative assessment of liver function, structure, nodules and predict evolution of cirrhosis
Background Portal hypertension (PH) is a spectrum of complications of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and cirrhosis, with severe manifestations including ascites and gastroesophageal varices. It is therefore important that timely and easily diagnosing PH has relevant prognostic and therapeutic implications. The current gold standard to evaluate PH is by hepatic vein catheterization using the transjugular approach, and measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPG). Time-resolved, three-dimensional, three-directional velocity-encoded MRI, also termed four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI, has been shown superior accuracy over conventional two-dimensional (2D) phase-contrast MRI, in particular for quantification of regurgitant volumes and severity of cardiac shunts. Recently, the investigators developed new imaging methods based on 4D flow MRI for visualization of the vasculature of the abdominal blood flow circulation including the portal vein. Using the newly developed computation fluid dynamics (CFD) model the investigators could determine the absolute local blood pressure in the portal vein. Preliminary data in healthy volunteers seem promising, however, data in patients with ESLD including the correlation with invasively measured HVPG are lacking. Objectives The primary objective is to develop and validate noninvasive CFD and 4D Flow MRI based HVPG calculation to estimate portal pressure in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Methods In 50 adult patients with ESLD, submitted for liver transplantation (LT) screening, HVPG measurements using the transjugular approach according to the standard LT screening protocol, will be extended by 4D flow MRI measurements. Anticipated results In patients with ESLD, portal pressure can be measured by 4D flow MRI and will replace the invasive transjugular approach. The measurements can be directly incorporated in the LT screening. Moreover, the possibility to easily measure portal pressure will be relevant for all patients with ESLD at risk for PH. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will undergo a single non-invasive MRI-examination of one hour long after a four hour period of fasting. The risks associated with non-invasive MRI examinations is neglectable.
In this study, a single non-invasive tool, spleen stiffness measurement (SSM), was used to monitor the disease regression of inpatients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and acute liver injury. The present study aimed to establish an early diagnosis warning model for acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) by SSM and investigate the effect of dynamic changes in SSM on the short-term prognosis (28-day, 90-day morbidity and mortality) of inpatients with CLD and acute liver injury.
A observational diagnostic study will be conducted to compare the performance of liver stiffness and spleen stiffness measured by 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in people with compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (cACLD), and explore the cut-off value of 2D-SWE for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH).
A observational diagnostic study will be conducted to compare the performance of liver stiffness and spleen stiffness measured by 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing gastroesophageal varices (GOV) in people with compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (cACLD), and explore the cut-off value of 2D-SWE for diagnosing GOV.
The prevalence of gastric varices is approximately 20%. It is important to note that gastric varices tend to bleed more severely, have a higher morbidity and mortality rate, and have a 35% to 90% risk of rebleeding after the cessation of acute hemorrhage. Because of the relatively low prevalence of gastric varices, the existing clinical studies have many deficiencies, and there is much controversy in the academic community, the optimal treatment and prevention strategies for gastric varices have not yet been fully defined. In the last few years, important advances have been made in the treatment and prevention of gastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Experts agree that the combination of pharmacological and endoscopic injection of tissue adhesives should be the first line of therapy in the acute bleeding episode from isolated gastric varices (IGV1) or type 2 gastroesophageal varices (GOV2) varices; whereas transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered a rescue therapy. TIPS has been shown to effectively prevent variceal rebleeding but with a potential increase in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy and/or liver failure. In this sense, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) in fundal variceal bleeding showed that an early TIPS, performed during the first 5 days after patient admission resulted in a significant decrease in failure to control bleeding and early and late rebleeding. However, the study was conducted for 4 years and only included 25 patients. Due to insufficient sample size, it was unable to reflect whether priority TIPS can bring survival benefits to patients with gastric variceal bleeding. Therefore, there is an urgent need for multi-center clinical studies with large samples to provide high-quality evidence in the field of prioritizing TIPS for the treatment of acute gastric variceal bleeding. The present study aims to compare the preemptive TIPS (performed during the first 72 hours after endoscopy) with standard second prophylaxis (endoscopic injection of tissue adhesives plus carvedilol) for patients with acute bleeding from gastric varices (IGV1 or GOV2). The primary outcome will be a 6-week mortality from inclusion.
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can lead to a further increase in portal venous pressure and increase the risk of rebleeding. Whether patients with acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT benefit from preemptive TIPS is still controversial. The present study is directed at comparing the outcome of patients with acute variceal bleeding with occlusive PVT treated by standard therapy (vasoactive drugs + endoscopic variceal ligation) with or without preemptive TIPS (performed during the first 1-3 days after endoscopic procedure). The primary outcome is survival free of variceal rebleeding at 6 weeks from inclusion.