Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05623215
Other study ID # NL82000.058.22
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 10, 2022
Est. completion date May 31, 2029

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Spaarne Gasthuis
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The cementless ATTUNETM Rotating Platform Knee system was compared in a single-blind, randomized RSA trial to its predecessor, the LCS rotating platform Knee System. In this previous study, 61 knees were subjected to RSA examinations at 1-day and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative. This study found a promising equal migration of both tibial components and a lesser migration of the femoral component of the ATTUNETM knee system after two years, although with a similar migration rate between year 1 and 2. this raises the question of whether the migration of the prostheses relative to each other will increase or remain the same in the long term. To examine this, a mid-and long-term RSA follow-up to measure migration is necessary. In addition, another new RSA measurement parameter has become known in recent years that may provide an indication of the bonding of the prosthesis to the bone at the time of measurement. This new parameter, called the Induced Displacement (ID) of a prosthesis, measures the position and orientation relative to the bone while the prosthesis is under different loading conditions (e.g., patient in supine or standing position). This means that a large measured difference between these different loading condition measurements would indicate that osseointegration of the prosthesis never occurred or is no longer present. To improve the understanding of the tendency of both prostheses to aseptic loosening after a mid- to long-term follow up, migration over time and inducible displacement analyses are necessary. The primary objective of this study is to accurately compare mid- and long-term migration of two uncemented TKR prostheses. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate if inducible displacement can be used as a parameter to detect loose implants, and to compare inducible displacement, clinical and radiological outcome and patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) after a follow-up of 5 and 10 years of two uncemented TKR prostheses.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 49
Est. completion date May 31, 2029
Est. primary completion date May 31, 2029
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: - The Patient participated in the initial study (NL58911.058.16) [1]. - The patient is capable of giving informed consent and expressing a willingness to comply with the study. Exclusion Criteria: A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: - The patient underwent a major revision TKR (exchange of the tibial or femoral component). - The patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent specific to this study.

Study Design


Intervention

Radiation:
Radiographs of the knee for radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
RSA radiographs will be made 5 and 10 years after the total knee arthroplasty.

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp Noord-Holland

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Spaarne Gasthuis Leiden University Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Complications Complications during follow-up will be reported 5 year post TKA
Other Complications Complications during follow-up will be reported 10 year post TKA
Primary Change from baseline migration of the prostheses Migration is measured and expressed in translations, rotations, and MTPM; MTPM is the point of the prosthesis that has moved most. 5 years post TKA
Primary Ten year change from baseline migration of the prostheses Migration is measured and expressed in translations, rotations and MTPM; MTPM is the point of the prosthesis that has moved most. 10 years post TKA
Secondary Inducible displacement The inducible displacement is defined as the difference in translation (MTPM) between a measurement without external force (e.g., supine position) and a measurement with external force (e.g., weight bearing) minus the measurement error. 5 years post TKA
Secondary Inducible displacement The inducible displacement is defined as the difference in translation (MTPM) between a measurement without external force (e.g., supine position) and a measurement with external force (e.g., weight bearing) minus the measurement error. 10 years post TKA
Secondary EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) A patient reported outcome score for assessing mental well-being by using a score from 0 to 1, with 0 = worse and 1 = best. 5 year post TKA
Secondary EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) A patient reported outcome score for assessing mental well-being by using a score from 0 to 1, with 0 = worse and 1 = best. 10 year post TKA
Secondary Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS) A 7-item patient reported outcome score that measures daily physical functioning by using a score of 0 to 100, with 0 = no problems and 100 = extreme problems. 5 year post TKA
Secondary Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS) A 7-item patient reported outcome score that measures daily physical functioning by using a score of 0 to 100, with 0 = no problems and 100 = extreme problems. 10 year post TKA
Secondary Oxford-12 Knee Score (OKS) A 12-item patient-reported outcome score to assess function and pain after total knee arthroplasty. The score uses a score of 0 to 48, with 0 = worse and 48 = best. 5 year post TKA
Secondary Oxford-12 Knee Score (OKS) A 12-item patient-reported outcome score to assess function and pain after total knee arthroplasty. The score uses a score of 0 to 48, with 0 = worse and 48 = best. 10 year post TKA
Secondary Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) A 13-item patient reported outcome score for assessing daily anterior knee pain, by using a score from 0 to 100, with 0 = having anterior knee pain with disabilities and 100 = no signs of anterior knee pain. 5 year post TKA
Secondary Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) A 13-item patient reported outcome score for assessing daily anterior knee pain, by using a score from 0 to 100, with 0 = having anterior knee pain with disabilities and 100 = no signs of anterior knee pain. 10 year post TKA
Secondary Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) A patient reported outcome score for assessing pain by using a likert scale from 0 to 10, with 0 = no pain and 10 = severe pain) 5 year post TKA
Secondary Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) A patient reported outcome score for assessing pain by using a likert scale from 0 to 10, with 0 = no pain and 10 = severe pain) 10 year post TKA
Secondary Anchor questions A patient reported outcome score for assessing change in functioning and pain since surgery.
The outcome is evaluated by use of a likert scale from 1 to 7, with 1 = much deteriorated and 7 = much improved).
5 year post TKA
Secondary Anchor questions A patient reported outcome score for assessing change in functioning and pain since surgery.
The outcome is evaluated by use of a likert scale from 1 to 7, with 1 = much deteriorated and 7 = much improved).
10 year post TKA
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04651673 - Prescribed Knee Brace Treatments for Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Knee OA)
Completed NCT05677399 - Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment With Peloidotherapy and Aquatic Exercise. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04043819 - Evaluation of Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of an Autologous Adipose-derived Cell Therapy Product for Treatment of Single Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06000410 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allograft in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Phase 3
Completed NCT05014542 - Needling Techniques for Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT05892133 - Prehabilitation Effect on Function and Patient Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT05528965 - Parallel Versus Perpendicular Technique for Genicular Radiofrequency N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03472300 - Prevalence of Self-disclosed Knee Trouble and Use of Treatments Among Elderly Individuals
Active, not recruiting NCT02003976 - A Randomized Trial Comparing High Tibial Osteotomy Plus Non-Surgical Treatment and Non-Surgical Treatment Alone N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04017533 - Stability of Uncemented Medially Stabilized TKA N/A
Completed NCT04779164 - The Relation Between Abdominal Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT04006314 - Platelet Rich Plasma and Neural Prolotherapy Injections in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT05423587 - Genicular Artery Embolisation for Knee Osteoarthritis II N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04145401 - Post Market Clinical Follow-Up Study- EVOLUTION® Revision CCK
Active, not recruiting NCT03781843 - Effects of Genicular Nerve Block in Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Completed NCT05974501 - Pre vs Post Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Phase 4
Completed NCT05324163 - Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of X0002 in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT05529914 - Effects of Myofascial Release and Neuromuscular Training for Pes Anserine Syndrome Associated With Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT05693493 - Can Proprioceptive Knee Brace Improve Functional Outcome Following TKA? N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05510648 - Evaluation of the Effect of High-intensity Laser Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis N/A