View clinical trials related to Knee Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:The primary objective of this randomized pilot study is to evaluate whether subchondroplasty combined with knee arthroscopy is more effective at reducing knee pain and improving knee function compared to knee arthroscopy alone. All knee function outcomes will be assessed at initial presentation, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months following surgery using validated questionnaires. Patient-reported pain will also be recorded at 2 weeks after surgery. The secondary objective of the study is to determine whether the subchondroplasty and knee arthroscopy group has better bone quality and bone micro-architecture compared to the group receiving knee arthroscopy alone. Bone quality/micro-architecture will be evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months following surgery using Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) imaging and at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery using X-rays.
Patient suffer from moderate posterior knee pain after TKA despite injection of local anesthetic around the femoral or saphenous nerves. Indeed, the posterior part of the knee is innervated by the sciatic nerve. This nerve is not routinely blocked as clinicians fear to produce a motor block of the leg that might impair the postoperative assessment. An analgesic alternative is the infiltration of the knee with local anesthetics performed by the surgeon. Recently a trial(1) demonstrated that a selective tibial nerve block provides an effective analgesia without a motor blockage when compared with a sciatic nerve block. The objective of this randomized controlled double-blinded trial is to assess whether a tibial nerve block is more effective for the postoperative pain than local infiltration analgesia when there are combined with an adductor canal block, without decreasing the functional parameters.
This study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial in a Chinese population.
The purpose of this study is to compare cemented and cementless versions of the Triathlon total knee arthroplasty/replacement (TKA) in terms of clinical outcomes, perioperative course, and outcome scores including function and patient satisfaction. Patients who present to the clinical practices of Dr. Ryan Nunley, Dr. Robert Barrack, or Dr. Denis Nam and are suitable candidates for primary TKA will be screened for eligibility and invited to participate. Once enrolled participants will be randomized (1:1) to either receive a cemented or cementless Triathlon TKA. Data collected for the study will include standard of care clinical and radiographic evaluations collected during office visits and surgery, as well as study-specific patient questionnaires. Clinical, radiographic and questionnaire data will be collected pre-operatively, at the time of surgery, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and beyond, and 2 years and beyond post-operatively. Patients will complete the following outcomes questionnaires preoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D. The following questionnaires will be collected at four to six weeks, six months, one year and beyond, and two years and beyond postoperatively: New Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Washington University Knee Satisfaction and Function Questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, SF-12, and EQ-5D, and a Pain Drawing. In addition, a Pain Diary with a pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be assessed once daily at home for 6 weeks after surgery.
This study is designed to better understand the effect of Kinesio Taping applied using the Neurotaping technique on patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty surgery. Patients will be randomized in two groups: in the first group patients will follow a protocol of usual rehabilitation, while the second group will do the same but add the Kinesio Taping application. Main outcome will be the effect on edema, secondary outcome the effect on functionality after 13 days post surgery.
KIO014 is an innovative chitosan-based biomaterial intended for synovial fluid viscosupplementation indicated for the symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study KIO014-APROOVE is aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of KIO014 in patients with symptomatic knee OA. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled. The study is divided in two stages. The Stage 1 cohort is the safety cohort where 10 patients will be enrolled. Stage 1 patients receiving two injections of KIO014 at day 0 and at month 3, and will be followed for 12 months post initial injection. The Stage 2 cohort is the performance cohort for 90 patients, and this stage will be randomized controlled and single-blind for the patient. In stage 2, 60 patients will receive an intra-articular injection of KIO014 (test group) and 30 patients will receive an intra-articular injection of Durolane® (control group). Patients will be followed for 6 months.
This study evaluates the effects arginine on osteoarthritis (OA) in adults. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups, taking arginine and nothing, respectively. Outcomes will be evaluated by lab test results on OA joint cartilage and self-administered questionnaires. The hypothesis is that arginine can slow down or reverse OA.
The purpose of this proposed study is to investigate both the acute and chronic response of frontal plane knee moment after gait retraining and to assess the effects on the biomechanics of the contralateral side. Fifty-one patients diagnosed with tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis (TFJ OA) will be recruited to participate in the proposed study. Participants will complete baseline trials to assess gait kinematic and kinetic parameters. Following baseline, each participant will perform six conditions of the foot progression gait or three conditions of the trunk lean gait modifications to determine which strategy is most effective in reducing frontal plane knee moment. Participants will then be randomized to either the control or experimental group based on their identified preferred strategy. Participants will complete eight gait retraining sessions using patient-specific gait modifications (tailored foot progression and tailored lateral trunk lean), or normal gait (control) during the training period. A fading feedback design will be implemented. Real-time haptic biofeedback will be provided on every step during the first two weeks and reduced by 25% every subsequent two weeks. No feedback will be provided during baseline and at testing sessions. Measures of pain and function will also be collected at all testing sessions. Variables of interest include ankle, knee, hip sagittal and frontal plane moments. In addition, sagittal and frontal plane impulse will also be assessed. Descriptive statistics will be calculated for foot progression angle, trunk lean angle, frontal and sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle angles as well as moments. Descriptive statistics for frontal plane knee impulse will also be calculated. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) will be conducted to compare frontal plane knee moment, frontal plane knee impulse and the absolute sagittal plane moment will be compared across three groups at four different time points. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be conducted to compare both sagittal and frontal plane joint biomechanics for the contralateral limb. The p-value will be set at .05.
An Open-label, 8-Week Study to Compare the Comfort and Ease of Use of Five Different Treatment Regimens for CNTX 4975-05 Intra-articular Injection in Subjects with Chronic, Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis Knee Pain.
This study will investigate the concurrent validity and intra-rater reliability of using smartphone in assessing joint position sense in patient with knee osteoarthritis.