View clinical trials related to Knee Arthroscopy.
Filter by:The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of preemptive oral gabapentin versus tramadol on postoperative pain after knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia.
Currently, suturing the lesion is recommended rather than the classic meniscectomy, which leads to early and subsequent gonarthrosis. The most commonly practiced technique is arthroscopic suturing after avivement the area to be sutured to promote healing. But the real benefit of this enhancement has never been documented. The complexity of the surgical procedure makes the acceptability of this indication low by orthopedic surgeons at present (10% sutures compared to 90% meniscectomies). The aim of the study is to evaluate the 10-year survival rate of meniscal sutures without avivement.
For a knee arthroscopy, two small incisions are made at the level of the joint line on each side of the patellar tendon. Closure of surgical incisions consists of using either nonabsorbable or absorbable sutures. Some surgeons prefer using nonabsorbable sutures due to it being easier to tie, these sutures are less likely to break prematurely, and that they elicit a minimal inflammatory response. On the other hand, some surgeons prefer using absorbable sutures due to the time savings of not having to remove the sutures at a later date and that these sutures decrease patient anxiety and discomfort. The purpose of this study is to prospectively investigate and compare patient's pain, swelling and cosmesis following knee arthroscopy surgery between patients who had their arthroscopy portals closed using resorbable sutures vs. patients who had their portals closed using nonabsorbable sutures.
All patients with acute lesions that attend the orthopedic and trauma center of the ABC medical center are invited to participate in the study. Those that meet the inclusion criteria and later sign an informed consent are randomized to receive 10 ml of a solution with ropivacaine at 7.5% and 2.0% intraarticular for the first 5 minutes after the end of surgery (closing of surgical wounds). Both the patient, the physician who applies it and the evaluator of outcomes remain blinded to the dose of ropivacaine the patient receives. Two hours after the end of the surgery, while the patient is in his room, the presence of pain is evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS), while the patient is asked to flex and extend his knee. The result is quantified continuously, to later categorize the pain in none to slight pain (0-3 points) and moderate-severe pain (4-10 points). All the information is recorded on established forms in the clinical file (general data), that includes the variables of interest for the study, and is reported by the physicians after standardization of all those in charge with collecting information to comply with the conceptual and operative operationalization of the variables described in the research protocol. In addition to the evaluation of pain, the administration of opioids to patients for necessary reasons (presence of pain) by the physicians in charge is recorded. It is hoped that, in patients with knee arthroscopy for acute lesion, there is a difference in the frequency of moderate-severe pain of 30% in the post-operative (frequency of 37.5% in patients with ropivacaine at 2% and frequency of 7.5% in patients with ropivacaine at 7.5%).
Objectives: To compare the postoperative analgesic effects of ibuprofen versus ketorolac in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery at Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi. Study design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: Department of Anasthesiology, Combined military Hospital, Rawalpindi Duration of study:6 months (01st August 2021 to 31st January 2022) Material and methods: After ethical approval, 100 patients in randomly divided two equal groups (A and B) were selected. In group A, 800 mg IV ibuprofen while in group B, 30 mg IV ketorolac was given within 30 min of skin closure after orthopedic surgery. The pain was assessed via visual analogue scale postoperatively. The SPSS version 25 was used for analysis of data. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant.
For patients with a history of knee surgery, especially knee arthroplasty, the persistence of abnormal gait kinematics is a frequently encountered issue that can hinder their ability to return to normal daily living. Muscular imbalances and leg length discrepancy (LLD) following knee arthroplasty can impact a patient's ability to return to a normal gait pattern. In a study of 98 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty, leg lengthening on the side of the operative knee was reported in 83% of patients as determined by comparing pre- and postoperative leg-length radiographs (Lang JE et al; J. Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):341-346). LLD can lead to compensations in surrounding joints, muscles, and myofascial structures. Compensatory musculoskeletal changes, including changes in pelvic tilt and curvature of the lumbar spine can alter gait mechanics, lead to mechanical low back pain, and increase the risk of degenerative disc disease (Sheha EDM et al; J. Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2018;6(8)(e6)). In addition, neurologic compensations can occur and include changes in muscular timing and muscular activation patterns. The mainstay of gait rehabilitation following knee surgery is physical therapy (PT) (O'Connor DP et al; J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;31(7):340-352), where LLD can be addressed with heel lift therapy. The use of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) to address chronic compensatory musculoskeletal changes following knee surgery in order to improve gait has not been extensively studied. Both OMT and PT have been shown to improve gait imbalances in a variety of neurological conditions such as Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Prader-Willi syndrome. Previous studies of these neurologic conditions have demonstrated increases in walking velocity, step length, stride length and range of motion of the lower extremities following OMT. It remains to be determined whether OMT can improve gait pattern abnormalities caused by compensatory musculoskeletal patterns that persistent after traditional postoperative knee rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to determine if OMT of chronic, compensatory, musculoskeletal issues associated with knee surgery improves gait parameters. In addition to providing objective parameters to assess and validate OMT, future patients recovering from knee surgery might benefit from OMT
Anti-inflammatory brace technology has demonstrated superior clinical outcomes in the management of knee osteoarthritis and accelerate recovery time for Major League Soccer players. Authors have postulated that embedding germanium into cotton garments increases circulation and augments the inflammatory process through a transdermal micro-electromagnetic field. In addition to immunomodulatory effects, knee braces immobilize and stabilize the joint through tactile feedback from the skin. Thus, a germanium-embedded knee brace may provide inflammatory control to augment pain and edema while concomitantly enhancing proprioception. Knee Arthroscopy rehabilitation goals during the acute post-operative phase include diminishment of pain and edema as well as restoration of knee range-of-motion. The presented study intends to assess the impact of a germanium-embedded knee brace on patient recovery after Knee Arthroscopy. Single-center blinded randomized controlled clinical trial to study effectiveness of germanium-infused knee brace on rehabilitation in patient population undergoing Knee Arthroscopy. Patients will be randomized into germanium-infused knee brace group and compared to a replica knee brace group. Inclusion criteria will include skeletally mature individuals undergoing primary Knee Arthroscopy. Exclusion criteria will include autoimmune disorders and history of surgery on ipsilateral joint. The presented protocol intends to assess the impact of a germanium-embedded knee brace on patient recovery after Knee Arthroscopy. The primary outcome measure was chosen for its implications for the design and conduct of the study,1 including well-validated outcome instrument for comparison, facilitation of a priori power analysis, randomization, and blinding. Secondary outcomes were chosen for their pertinence to surgeon decision-making during patient rehabilitation.
This is a randomized controlled trial of 200 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years undergoing outpatient knee or shoulder arthroscopy. Patients will be evaluated clinically at 2 and 6 weeks post-operatively. Patients will be recruited from experienced arthroscopic surgeons at 3 hospital sites in Hamilton, Ontario. All research will be conducted according to international standards of Good Clinical Practice and institutional research policies and procedures.
A pilot study to evaluate the effect of incorporating sublingual sufentanil into our perioperative opioid regimen for ambulatory orthopedic surgery.
The purpose of this study is to apply the concept of rapid rehabilitation nursing in the perioperative period of knee arthroscopy, to make up for the gap in this field, to provide reference basis for the general colleagues, promote the development of perioperative rapid rehabilitation nursing of knee arthroscopy, accelerate the rehabilitation of patients.