View clinical trials related to Kidney Calculi.
Filter by:This is a prospective randomized study, comparing quality of life in renal stone patients undergoing surgical treatment with ureteroscopy (URS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).
The Investigators objective is to compare the clinical efficacy of a single-day protocol with a short-course protocol for PCNL. The investigator hope is to reduce the use of possibly unnecessary prolonged antibiotic use, reduce hospital costs and prevent the further propagation of resistant microbes.
Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of 28 days of treatment with ALLN-177 for reducing urinary oxalate excretion in patients with secondary hyperoxaluria and kidney stones.
It is aimed to evaluate the treatment results, rates of success and complications, and injury given to the kidney by measuring preoperative and postoperative blood and Cystatin C levels in patients with kidney stones smaller than 2 cm who will undergo either ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) or micro PCNL.
It is aimed to evaluate the treatment results, rates of success and complications, and injury given to the kidney by measuring preoperative and postoperative blood urea, creatinine, Cystatin C and Netrin-1 levels and urine Cystatin C and Netrin-1 levels in patients with lower pole or renal pelvis stone(s) undergoing either one of the treatment modalities including conventional percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL), mini PCNL, ultra-mini PCNL, micro PCNL, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is recommended for kidney stones < 20 mm. However, the stone clearance of lower pole calculi after SWL is limited, thus leading to an extended indication for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) even for stones between 10 and 20 mm in many centers. This trend is further promoted by introduction of super-mini PCNL (SMP), which is postulated to be less invasive compared to mini-PCNL due to the miniaturized instruments. However, this issue remains controversial. On the other hand, improvements in endoscopy technology have made retrograde stone removal more attractive. This has led to an increasing use of RIRS as a primary treatment although it is recommended only as 2nd-line option by current guidelines. However, the treatment of symptomatic lower pole calculi is a challenge for RIRS because of lower clearance rates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMP and RIRS for the treatment for symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of different doses of ALLN 177 for reducing urinary oxalate excretion in patients with secondary hyperoxaluria and recurrent kidney stones.
A. Synopsis 1. This protocol comes to direct the experiment to be performed on the Aqueduct Automatic Continuous Irrigation system. 2. The Aquaduct System is aimed at reducing risks to the patient by decreasing the irrigation fluid pressure he may be exposed to, reducing the procedure time and therefore the anesthesia time, reducing the manual handling of the sterile bags and the risk of contamination and more. 3. In general since there is no new procedure suggested and the equipment does not actually come into contact with the human body in any direct way, there is no need to have a clinical study for the regulation purpose. The reason for performing this experiment is to demonstrate the new system and to find out the best way to operate it in order to improve the process and reduce risks. 4. This information will serve the development of most suitable automation solution for achieving the long desired continuous irrigation. 5. The experiment will be performed in the OR in MIS procedures, and will replace the standard gravitational manual method of performing the irrigation. The surgeons and the medical staff of the OR will be directed with the set up and operation of the system prior to using it. The experiment will be accompanied at all times with a knowledgeable representative of the research originator. 6. A maximum of 30 procedures will be analyzed during a period of approximately one month. The surgeons and the medical staff will report their impression of using the system during the procedures and will recommend the best settings achieved. This information will be used to improve the system performance and design.
This study is a prospective, randomized multicenter study conducted in Europe. It is designed to compare two double loop ureteral stents in terms of the quality of life in patients operated on a kidney stone and requiring the placement of a double loop ureteral stent at the end of the operation.
The purpose of this study is to define the cause of renal stones and the risk pattern for recurrence of renal stones episodes (any kind of stones) in HIV1 patients.