View clinical trials related to Irreversible Pulpitis.
Filter by:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate premedication with ketorolac infiltration on post endodontic pain in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Design: Randomized double blind clinical trial Setting and conduct: Sixty adult volunteers with including criteria will be divided into two groups (n=30) based on random table. All patients will receive standard inferior alveolar nerve block of 2% lidocaine with 1:800000 epinephrine and supplemental buccal infiltration of 0.9 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:800000 epinephrine. After five minutes one group will receive supplemental buccal infiltration of 30 mg/mL of Ketorolac Tromethamine and the control group will receive buccal infiltration of normal saline. Endodontic access preparation will initiate after 15 minutes of initial IANB with two negative responses to the electric pulp test. The pain level will be recorded immediately and at the 2,4,6 and 24 hours following the treatment using Heft- Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP- VAS). Data will be evaluated using Repeated measured test (if possible) and otherwise non-parametric tests such as rival Friedman and X2 test. Participants including major eligibility criteria: all patients age ranged 18-65 with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (HP VAS ≥54) and without pain on percussion on a mandibular molar tooth who need root canal treatment and are without systemic diseases; nonsmoking; non pregnant, non breast feeding without any medicine consumption or analgesic and sedation Intervention: Ketorolac infiltration Main outcome measures: Pain level at immediately after the treatment, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours following the root canal treatment using HP VAS.
The procedure currently recommended for the treatment of irreversible pulpitis is the endodontic treatment, i.e. the complete elimination of the pulp, disinfection and obturation of the whole root canal system. The emergency procedure consists of a pulpotomy, followed at an ulterior appointment by the root canal treatment. The purpose of the present pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of performing the pulpotomy as a permanent treatment in mature molars. If hemostasis can be achieved after removing the coronal part of the pulp, a tricalcium silicate cement will be directly applied on the remaining pulp at the root canal entrances. A short-term follow-up will be performed at one week by evaluating the pain relief of the patient. Long-term success will then be evaluated every year by verifying the absence of periapical radiolucency on the x-ray as well as the absence of clinical symptoms and signs. A standard root canal procedure will serve as control. During the pulpotomy treatment, blood sample with microcapillary will be performed. We will analyze a ratio of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines.
This study compared the anesthetic efficacy between Lignocaine and articaine administering it intraligamentarly using ligajet in twenty five female patients having irreversible pulpitis on bilateral mandibular molars. At 5minutes of post injection, the teeth were isolated with rubber dam and access performed. Patients were instructed to definitively rate any pain felt during endodontic procedure. If patient felt pain, the treatment was immediately stopped and the patient rated their discomfort using Heft Parker VAS. The extent of access achieved when the patient felt pain was recorded as within dentin, entering the pulp chamber or initial file placement. The success was defined as the ability to access and instrument the tooth without pain (VAS score of zero) or mild pain (VAS rating<54mm).
The aim of this study is premedication efficacy of analgesics on post endodontic pain. Sixty-six healthy adult volunteers including criteria, are participating. The patients will be divided into 3 groups and will be randomly given one of pre medications including 1) 10 mg Ketorolac, 2) 10 mg Ketorolac plus 1000mg Acetaminophen, and 3)Placebo, 45 minutes before applying the injection. All patients will receive standard root canal treatment. Patients will record their post treatment pain using a Heft parker Visual Analog Scale(VAS). Success will be considered as no or mild pain (VAS≤54)with no need to take analgesic. Data will be analysed using Mann-U-Whitney and Kruskal-wallis tests.
The aim of this study is effect of premedication on success of inferior alveolar nerve block injection. Sixty healthy adult volunteers including criteria, are participating. The patients will be divided into 3 groups and will be randomly given one of premedications including 1) 10 mg Ketorolac, 2) 10 mg Ketorolac plus 1000mg Acetaminophen, and 3)Placebo, 45 minutes before applying the injection. All patients will receive standard Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block injection . Patients with no lip numbness and positive responses to cold and electric pulp tests would be excluded from the study. Endodontic access preparation will be initiated 15 minutes after Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block injection. Pain during treatment will be recorded using a Heft parker Visual Analog Scale(VAS). Success will be considered as no or mild pain (VAS≤54) during caries/dentin removal, access cavity preparation and working lengths measurements. Data will be analysed using Mann-U-Whitney and Kruskal-wallis tests.
Root canal therapy will ideally eliminate post-endodontic pain but occasionally analgesics are needed to diminish the pain [1]. Development of pain after completion of root canal treatment may undermine patients' confidence in the procedure and the clinician [2]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are one of the most frequently taken analgesic medications for dental pain. Their popularity attributed to their efficacy in relieving pain and fever and low side effect profile at therapeutic doses [3]. Mono-therapy analgesic has a low effect on dental pain. Improvement was performance by combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action without raising any adverse effects [4], was effective in controlling moderate to severe pain. The combination of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and paracetamol has shown additive analgesia for treating dental pain in several studies [5,6]. Endodontic treatment with a lower prevalence of postoperative pain is usually the treatment of choice. There have been no controlled dental studies evaluating the additive effects of combining a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with paracetamol. Breivik et al [6] & Menhinick et al [7] found that a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen was more effective than ibuprofen alone in managing postoperative pain. Aim of the present study, to evaluate the efficacy of the paracetamol when used alone and in combinations with three groups of drugs to control postoperative endodontic pain.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy of multiple doses of Dexketoprofen Trometamol 25 mg on postoperative pain following emergency endodontic treatment in teeth with irreversible pulpitis, using as control Ibuprofen 600 mg and a placebo group. Hypothesis: Dexketoprofen trometamol when administered in multiple doses produces a greater effect to control postoperative pain after treating symptomatic irreversible pulpitis; in patients undergoing pulpotomy as an emergency procedure
The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of an anesthetic called articaine for dental treatment, comparing it with an anesthetic commonly used in dental clinic: lidocaine. Two types of local anesthesia (oral injection) in accordance with the solution used were performed. For patients anesthetized with articaine, an injection of anesthesia close to the tooth to be treated was used. For the anesthetic lidocaine an injection on the cheek at the bottom of the mouth was made. Differences between both techniques are mainly regarding the area of numbness. In the injection with articaine only a small part of the lip and the tooth was anesthetized. With lidocaine injection, the lower region of the entire side of the tooth and half of the tongue on the same side was numbed. The treatment was electronic randomized and there was equal chance to one or another treatment. The investigators are studying this new form of anesthesia (near the tooth that was treated) to see if it can numb the tooth to an emergency treatment, if it really decreases the feeling of numbness and discomfort during the service. Patients receiving articaine were submitted to cone beam exam at no cost.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Lidocaine/epinephrine with and without Sufentanil on the rate of anesthesia after supplemental intraligamentary injection (PDL) in teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
To compare the effect of different VPT methods using Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement for management of human dental pulp with irreversible pulpitis.