View clinical trials related to Infarction.
Filter by:This study is a prospective multicenter observational study for external validation and model advancement of a deep learning based 12-lead electrocardiogram analysis algorithm targeting adult patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and acute myocardial infarction equivalent symptoms. About 9,000 adult patients will be enrolled at 20 emergency medical centers in Korea. Artificial intelligence algorithms are manufactured by Medical AI Co., Ltd. It is an advanced version based on the model developed and published in 2020. It had the diagnostic performance of area under the receiver operating curve 0.901 and 0.951 for acute myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, respectively. The primary endpoint is a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction on the day of the emergency center visit, and the secondary endpoint is a 30-day major adverse cardiac event. From March 2022, patient registration will begin at centers that have been approved by the Institutional Review Board. This is the first prospective multicenter emergency department validation study for a 12-lead electrocardiogram artificial intelligence algorithm to diagnose acute myocardial infarction. This study will give insight into the direction of future development by verifying whether the deep learning algorithm works well for patients visiting the real-world adult emergency medical center.
Glucose monitoring after Acute Myocardial infarct in people with diabetes is a Dexcom funded study that is investigating whether the use of continuous glucose monitors (Dexcom ONE model) in people with type 2 diabetes facilitates time in glycaemic range in the 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction. As an exploratory outcome it will investigate whether time in glycaemic range is associated with changes in mortality and major adverse cardiac events in the 6 months after acute myocardial infarct.
The present pilot study will investigate the prevalence of CMD in an unselected cohort of patients with the working diagnosis MINOCA and to study if the diagnostic yield can be improved by adding adenosine to the CMR investigation. Patient will be their own controls.
Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) proved their favorable outcomes in heart failure. However, it is still unknown if their role extent into preventing heart failure, especially after acute myocardial infarction. This study aimed at identifying if there is such role for SGLT2i.
Researchers are looking for a better way to prevent the formation of blood clots in people who have or have had: - an irregular and often rapid heartbeat - a blocked blood flow to the heart - a blocked or reduced blood flow to a part of the brain. When a blood clot forms in the body in patients with the above conditions, it may block vessels of the heart, the brain and/or other parts of the body. This may lead to heart attack, stroke and other serious complications. Blood clots are formed in a process known as coagulation. This is a complex series of steps that must occur in a specific sequence. Medications are already available to prevent the formation of blood clots. They work by interrupting one or more of the coagulation steps and are therefore known as anticoagulants. They decrease the risk of the above-mentioned complications. The study treatment asundexian works by blocking a very specific step in the blood clotting process, the activation of a protein called Factor XIa. Due to its very specific action that is not thought to be involved in the main blood clotting steps needed to stop bleeding (e.g. like from a cut finger), asundexian is expected to reduce the risk of bleeding that is still seen with existing anticoagulants. Since people who need an anticoagulant may also have liver problems, information on asundexian use in this group is needed. The main purpose of this study is to learn how asundexian moves into, through and out of the body in participants with a mild or moderate reduction in liver function compared to participants with normal liver function who are similar in age, weight, and gender. To answer this question, researchers will measure - the average highest level of asundexian in the blood (also referred to as Cmax) - the average total level of asundexian in the blood (also referred to as AUC). that were reached after intake of a single tablet of asundexian. The researchers will compare these data between participants with reduced liver function and matched participants with normal liver function to look for differences. Each participant will be in the study for up to 4 weeks. Participants will stay in-house for 6 days, starting the day before taking asundexian. In addition, two visits to the study site are planned. During the study, the doctors and their study team will: - do physical examinations - check vital signs - take blood and urine samples - examine heart health using an electrocardiogram (ECG) - ask the participants questions about how they are feeling and what adverse events they are having. An adverse event is any medical problem that a participant has during a study. Doctors keep track of all adverse events that happen in studies, even if they do not think the adverse events might be related to the study treatments.
Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is common and associated with poor clinical outcomes, with as many as one in ten experiencing recurrent MI within one year, and only one in three alive at five years. Recent prospective data demonstrates two-thirds of patients with type 2 MI have underlying coronary artery disease and one-third have left ventricular systolic impairment. Importantly, this is previously unrecognised in over half of all patients, suggesting there may be opportunities to identify and treat these underlying conditions to modify clinical outcomes. The investigators will undertake a pilot randomised controlled trial in which patients will be randomised to standard care or a complex intervention involving detailed cardiology assessment for the likelihood of coronary disease or left ventricular impairment, followed by targeted investigation and treatment where underlying disease is identified. This study will inform the design and delivery of a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial powered for clinical outcomes.
The aim of this study is to assess the impact of culprit-first versus culprit-last percutaneous coronary intervention on the door to balloon time and clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Prospective biomedical research study
As an effective treatment for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), early reperfusion may reduce the infarct size and improve the prognosis of patients. However, it remains uncertain whether adjunctive thrombolytic therapy administered immediately prior to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes in patients undergoing the procedure within 120 minutes. In this investigator-initiated, prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, subjects meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria should be randomly assigned 1:1 to the trial group (r-SAK) or the control group (placebo). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events within 90 days will be observed.
Radial approach is widely established in cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic treatments. It has been shown to decrease bleeding, vascular problems, and mortality rates when compared to the femoral approach. It also offers better comfort to patients through early mobility and lowers hospital expenses. Previously, there were no specific devices for radial artery hemostasis. Many different types of dressings were used in various hospitals with no standardization. This raises the question of whether specific devices surpass dressings in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular complications. The primary goal of this study was to examine the effectiveness of compression dressings and hemostatic wristbands on patients undergoing cardiac procedures via radial approach in terms of patient comfort, time required to maintain hemostasis, and vascular problems. The hemostatic wristband TR BandR (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was utilized in one group, while compressive elastic dressing, standardized as 13 threads gauze overlapped, opened, longitudinally pleated once and wrapped, making a 5-cm long cylinder, 1-cm in height, was used in the other.