View clinical trials related to Ileostomy - Stoma.
Filter by:The overall aim of this study is to determine the performance and safety of a novel coated material inside Convatec Ostomy Pouches, and to explore the clinical and quality of life benefits that may occur with the use of the test product. A minimum of 30 subjects, and a maximum of 40 subjects will be recruited to obtain 30 complete datasets comprised of a minimum of 15 colostomy and minimum of 10 ileostomies.
In the era of laparoscopy, ileostomy via specimen extraction site has been proposed as a novel approach for temporary ostomy creation to prevent anastomotic leak after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection. Whether suturing the layer of the peritoneum and anterior rectus sheath affects the safety of this novel approach has not been investigated.
In this study the investigators will evaluate the acceptability of a communication intervention for fecal ostomy surgery (CI-oSurg) to address the needs of adults who are undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. The investigators will recruit 24 patients and 4 clinicians (surgical nurses, wound ostomy nurses). At least half of patients are 65 years or older to understand the unique needs of older adults recovering from fecal ostomy surgery that might impact intervention acceptability. Questionnaires will be administered at two time-points for patient participants: upon study start and 4 weeks after exposure to the intervention.
Randomized, Interventional ,Open labeled, Parallel Assignment and Superiority trial.
The goal of this interventional study is to learn about the digestibility of different plant-based proteins in adults (age 18-75) with an ileostomy. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. How does the digestibility of proteins in the small intestine differ between different plant-based proteins? 2. Which proteins and amino acids are not digested or absorbed in the small intestine and are available for further metabolic processes in the large intestine? 3. How do metabolites in the collected content of the ileostomy bag differ after consuming different plant-based proteins? 4. Can the in vivo results be compared to results from existing in vitro models? Participants will consume five different protein meals (oat protein - high bioavailable, oat protein - low bioavailable, pea protein - high bioavailable, pea protein low bioavailable, protein-free meal) on five different study days in a random order. Five hours after consuming the test meals ileostomy bags will be collected and the content will be analysed to answer the above mentioned research questions.
1 study: A pilot study of 8 adults with ileostomy was included in this trial of "first in human" with InterPoc™, an absorbent intestinal tampon safety and feasibility in humans with ileostomies. Study 2: A study in total with 24 participants, evaluating both the safety but also the functionality of InterPoc in humans with ileostomies.
This study focused on the alterations of gut microbiome and function during defunctioning ileostomy, and observed the effects of probiotic intervention on intestinal microbiome and function. The investigators looked forward to find the specific intestinal maladjusted flora from this work, which could provide a new scheme for the subsequent treatment of the damaged intestinal function and the reduction of the incidence of postoperative complication.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare early feeding vs conventional feeding after stoma reversal. The main question it aims to answer are: • whether it is beneficial to start oral feeding within 12hrs after stoma reversal Participants will be randomly assigned two groups either early feeding or conventional group
Background There are no prospective trials comparing the two main reconstructive options after colectomy for Ulcerative colitis, ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis. An attempt on a randomized controlled trial has been made but after receiving standardized information patients insisted on choosing operation themselves. Methods Adult Ulcerative colitis patients subjected to colectomy eligible for both ileal pouch anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis are asked to participate and after receiving standardized information the get to choose reconstructive method. Patients not declining reconstruction or not considered eligible for both methods will be followed as controls. The CRUISE study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, controlled trial on satisfaction, QoL, function, and complications between ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis. Discussion Reconstruction after colectomy is a morbidity-associated as well as a resource-intensive activity with the sole purpose of enhancing function, Quality of Life and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to provide the best possible information on the risks and benefits of each reconstructive treatment.
The loop ileostomy is an effective method used to bypass faecal contents and reduce the sequelae of possible anastomotic leakage. I t is most often performed after a low anterior resection indicated for lower-middle rectal cancer. A second operation is required for closure, with a morbidity of about 25%. Many studies have been completed in order to detect possible risk factors - both patient-related and surgery-related - for complications in ileostomy closure surgery. Currently, there is a lack of research studies focused on the preoperative management of these patients. Our purpose is to reduce the complication rate by optimizing the preoperative status of the distal ileum and to analyze its impact on the reduction of postoperative ileus. Main objective: To assess whether efferent loop stimulation two weeks before ileostomy closure decreases the incidence of postoperative paralytic ileus.