Clinical Trials Logo

Hysteroscopic Surgery clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hysteroscopic Surgery.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05801172 Completed - Pain Clinical Trials

Managing Outpatient Hysteroscopy-associated Pain

Start date: July 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Hysteroscopy is a reference diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in intrauterine pathologies, increasingly performed without general anesthesia. Pain is the most common reason for discontinuation of outpatient hysteroscopy (OH). There is no consensus on pain alleviation during OH. The aim was to compare the effectiveness of pain relief options during OH.

NCT ID: NCT05520645 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Hysteroscopic Surgery

Etomidate Induction in Hysteroscopic Surgery

Start date: August 25, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study intends to study the optimal dose induced by etomidate in outpatients undergoing painless hysteroscopic surgery. At present, the dosage in the user manual is 0.1-0.3mg/kg. In clinical use, it is found that 0.1mg/kg often fails to achieve sedative effect, and 0.3mg/kg is prone to muscle twitching. Therefore, three groups of doses of 0.15mg/kg, 0.2mg/kg and 0.25mg/kg are set. It is hoped that this study will provide a basis for clinical evaluation of etomidate in anesthesia induction of hysteroscopic surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04540952 Terminated - Clinical trials for Hysteroscopic Surgery

Comparison of Fluid Capture Efficiency of the Total Capture Drape Versus a Standard Drape for Hysteroscopy

Start date: January 9, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Safety during operative hysteroscopy requires a fluid management system to assist in gauging patient fluid absorption of media used for visualizing the uterine cavity. Serious patient complications, including hyponatremia (low serum sodium), heart failure, and pulmonary and cerebral edema, can result from over absorption of this distending medium. Failure of surgical drapes to collect unabsorbed fluid causes inaccurate determination of the hysteroscopic fluid deficit (HD) thus preventing proper risk evaluation for patient fluid overload, could prompt premature procedure terminatio, and result in hazards for the OR team. Specific Aims: 1. To perform a comparative trial of the "Total Capture" hysteroscopy drape (TCD) versus the standard drape during patient surgeries to document improved, real-time determination of patient fluid absorption. Pilot testing of a prototype design of the "Total Capture drape" versus the conventional hysteroscopy drape indicated remarkable improvement in fluid capture and accurate fluid deficit determination in a plastic pelvic model experiment. 2. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the TCD compared to the Standard drape for hysteroscopy with the standardized metrics of: 1) the Technology Acceptance Model, and 2) The System Usability Scale. These metrics will allow us to quantitate clinical usefulness and usability of both the operating surgeons and operating room staff. The investigators hypothesize the "Total Capture" Drape design provides an accurate recorded hysteroscopic fluid deficit in real-time so that patient safety and surgical parameters are optimized. The simple design of the TCD would add a very significant improvement for patient safety and care with minimal cost for the estimated 200,000 hysteroscopies performed per year in the U.S.

NCT ID: NCT03359655 Completed - Pain, Postoperative Clinical Trials

A Trial for Peroperative Procedure and Postoperative Pain After Rectal Misoprostol or Rectal Hyoscine Administration

Start date: June 11, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Dilatation of the cervix is necessary before operative hysteroscopic procedures. This dilatation with Hegar dilators has certain difficulties and is associated with pain. Cervical priming with various substances soften the cervix, ease the entry for the operation and decrease complications such as uterine perforation. The investigators aimed to compare rectally administered "misoprostol" and" hyoscine butyl bromide" with sham protocol.

NCT ID: NCT02101827 Completed - Clinical trials for Hysteroscopic Surgery

Safety and Efficacy of Distending Media Infusion by Manual Syringe Method for Hysteroscopic Procedures

Start date: March 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of manual syringe-infusion method in hysteroscopic procedures.

NCT ID: NCT01084200 Completed - Clinical trials for Laparoscopic Surgery

Comparison of Sevoflurane, Propofol, and Sevoflurane Plus Propofol for Maintenance of Anaesthesia

Start date: September 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Postoperative pain may be affected by general anaesthetics. The effect of propofol and sevoflurane on postoperative pain in chinese female patients has not been demonstrated before. This study compared the postoperative pain score in patients under general anaesthesia maintained with propofol,sevoflurane, or sevoflurane+propofol.

NCT ID: NCT00763789 Recruiting - Conscious Sedation Clinical Trials

Local Anaesthesia and Remifentanil Sedation Versus Total Intravenous Anaesthesia for Hysteroscopic Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Department.

Start date: August 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare a new method: the combination of conscious sedation with remifentanil (a shortlasting opioid drug) and local anaesthesia, with the traditional general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic surgery. The primary outcomes are: the time spent in the operation room, the time to full mobilisation postoperatively and the time to complete recovery postoperatively and the time to discharge. Secondary outcome: patient satisfaction.