Hypertension Intracranial Clinical Trial
— RANDECPEDOfficial title:
Evaluation of the Benefits of Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children With Refractory Intracranial Hypertension
NCT number | NCT03766087 |
Other study ID # | 18-HPNCL-01 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Withdrawn |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | November 2019 |
Est. completion date | June 2025 |
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Fondation Lenval |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of mortality and severe disability in the pediatric population. The prognosis of these patients depends on the severity of the initial lesions but also on the effectiveness of the therapies used to prevent or at least limit secondary lesions mainly intracranial hypertension (HTIC). The medical therapeutic strategy for the control of HTIC in children with TBI is well codified: starting with hyperosmolar therapy, then hyperventilation and ultimately the use of barbiturates to deepen sedation. However, these therapies are not devoid of adverse effects (hypernatremia, cerebral hypoxemia, systemic vasodilation) and, for some, their efficacy is diminished over time. When these treatments are insufficient to lower intracranial pressure (ICP), decompressive craniectomy is proposed. Decompressive craniectomy is used in a well-coded manner in malignant ischemic stroke in adults. In TBI, to date, there are two randomized studies in adults and one in children but with a small number of patients, evaluating the benefit of decompressive craniectomy. None of them showed significantly superiority of the surgery compared to the maximal medication treatment on the functional prognosis in the medium term. However, these studies have many biases, including a significant cross-over from the conservative treatment group to the surgery arm. Nevertheless, the pediatric literature on the subject seems to yield better results on neurological prognosis in the long term. There are guidelines on the medical management of childhood TBI published by the National Institute of Health in 2012, which emphasize the need for controlled and randomized studies to define the place of decompressive craniectomy in children. That is why the investigators are proposing this national multicentre study.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | June 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A to 17 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Less than 18 years of age - Severe traumatic brain injury (initial Glasgow coma scale < 9) - Accidental trauma - Refractory intracranial hypertension: ICP > 20 mmHg over 30 minutes for children more than one year of age and ICP > 15 mmHg over 30 minutes for children of less than one year of age. - The patient must receive optimal medical management - Affiliation with a social security scheme - Signed informed consent is to be provided by the two holders of parental authority Exclusion Criteria: - Inflicted cranial trauma (e.g. shaken baby syndrome) - Patients having an initial surgery for removal of an intracranial hemorrhagic collection of blood (e.g. a subdural hematoma, extradural hematoma, and intraparenchymal hematoma) for which the flap was not replaced. - Pregnant patient |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHU Bordeaux | Bordeaux |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fondation Lenval |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | functional neurological status of the patients at 2 years | Functional neurological status (equating with success of the treatment) will be measure by the Glasgow Outcomes Scale-Extended Pediatric version.
Extended GOS (GOSE) provides detailed categorization into eight categories by subdividing the categories of severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery into a lower and upper category. the GOSE range from 1 to 8 (Upper Good Recovery to Death). A score from 3 defines satisfactory functional neurological status. This threshold is selected as it equates to a moderate level of disability, that is to say a child that is autonomous in regard to daily activities and that is able to attend school |
two years after surgery | |
Secondary | Progression of the IntraCranial Pressure at 24 hours | the difference between the value of the ICP at 24 hours after inclusion and the value of the ICP at inclusion time | 24 hours after inclusion | |
Secondary | functional neurological status of the patients at 1 years | Functional neurological status (equating with success of the treatment) will be measure by the Glasgow Outcomes Scale-Extended Pediatric version.
A score from 3 defines satisfactory functional neurological status. SCORES: 8 - Death 7 - Vegetative State 6 - Lower Severe Disability 5 - Upper Severe Disability 4 - Lower Moderate Disability 3 - Upper Moderate Disability 2 - Lower Good Recovery 1 - Upper Good Recovery |
1 year after inclusion | |
Secondary | Evaluation of the overall cognitive functioning | neuropsychological assessment at one year and at two years using the Wechsler intelligence scales. the Wechsler intelligence scales are a Intelligence Quotient tests.
Five standard tests are done to evaluate: the verbal comprehension index, the fluid reasoning index, the working memory index, and the processing speed index, as well as a total Intelligence Quotient. Classification of performance for scaled index scores are as follows: Below Average - scaled score 1 to 5 Low Average - scaled score 6 to 7 Average - scaled score 8 to 11 High Average - scaled score 12 to 13 Superior - 14 to 15 Very Superior - 16 to 20 Descriptors of performance for standard WISC score ranges are as follows: Below Average - standard score below 79 Low Average - standard score 80 to 89 Average - 90 to 109 High Average - 110 to 119 Superior - 120 to 129 Very Superior - above 130 |
at 1 year and 2 years after inclusion | |
Secondary | description of surgical parameters patients with successful craniectomy | Collection of surgical parameters of the patient with successful surgery upon admission to resuscitation.
The objective is to describe the predictive factors of successful craniectomy. |
at 2 years after craniectomy | |
Secondary | description of clinical parameters patients with successful craniectomy | Collection of clinical parameters of the patient with successful surgery upon admission to resuscitation.
The objective is to describe the predictive factors of successful craniectomy. |
at 2 years after craniectomy | |
Secondary | description of radiological parameters patients with successful craniectomy | Collection of radiological parameters of the patient with successful surgery upon admission to resuscitation.
The objective is to describe the predictive factors of successful craniectomy. |
at 2 years after craniectomy | |
Secondary | number of adverse events linked to surgery | collection of adverse events linked to decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty (infectious, hemorrhagic,cerebrospinal fluid ) | from inclusion time to the end of patient participation, for about 2 years | |
Secondary | Overall survival | The survival time will be defined as the time between the date of the Crania Trauma and when death occurs from all causes combined. | at 3 months and 2 years post cranial trauma | |
Secondary | Evaluation of quality of life | measure of quality of life by Lansky scale, is a observational scoring system, in a range of 0-100. 0 represents unresponsive, and 100 represents full active, normal. | at 3 months, 1 years and 2 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06057155 -
Intracranial Pressure and Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter With CLOSED Bundle
|