Hypercholesterolemia Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dosing with mipomersen for 26 weeks in treating severely hypercholesterolemic patients who are on a maximally tolerated lipid-lowering regimen and who are not on apheresis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 58 |
Est. completion date | October 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Fasting LDL-C =200 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) at screening and the presence of at least 1 of the following criteria: - Myocardial infarction (MI) - Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) - Coronary artery disease documented by angiography or any other accepted imaging technique - Positive exercise test (=1 mm ST-depression at maximal exercise or test terminated because of angina) or a perfusion defect (e.g., thallium or single photon emission computed tomography) - Other clinical atherosclerotic diseases: peripheral artery disease, symptomatic carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm - Or, if alternative above were not met, fasting LDL-C =300 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) - On stable, maximally tolerated statin therapy for 8 weeks - On stable, medication from an additional class of hypolipidemic agents for 8 weeks. - On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks - Stable weight for 6 weeks Exclusion Criteria: - Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes - Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company | Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
United States, Canada, Czech Republic, Germany, South Africa, United Kingdom,
McGowan MP, Tardif JC, Ceska R, Burgess LJ, Soran H, Gouni-Berthold I, Wagener G, Chasan-Taber S. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of mipomersen in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. PLoS On — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | Triglycerides were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Triglycerides at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | Lipoprotein(a) was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Lipoprotein(a) at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Percentage Change From Baseline in Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | VLDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | VLDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Change From Baseline in Ratio of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | LDL-C and HDL-C were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | Apo-A1 was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Apo-A1 at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | Percentage Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Other | HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Primary | Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point | LDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. For patients with triglycerides <400 mg/dL, LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's calculation; and for patients with triglycerides >=400 mg/dL, LDL-C was directly measured by the central laboratory using ultracentrifugation. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Primary | LDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Primary Efficacy Time Point | Apo-B was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Secondary | Apo-B at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | Total cholesterol was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Secondary | Total Cholesterol at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | Non-HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Secondary | Non-HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) | The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. | Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04998695 -
Health Effects of Consuming Olive Pomace Oil
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03947866 -
Ezetimibe-Rosuvastatin Evaluation Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT01709513 -
Study of Alirocumab (REGN727/SAR236553) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Moderate, High, or Very High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk, Who Are Intolerant to Statins (ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01212900 -
Randomized Trial of Imaging Versus Risk Factor-Based Therapy for Plaque Regression
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00001154 -
Lipoprotein Metabolism in Normal Volunteers and Patients With High Levels of Lipoproteins
|
||
Completed |
NCT02550288 -
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MK-0653C in Japanese Participants With Hypercholesterolemia (MK-0653C-383)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03929198 -
Translation of Pritikin Program to the Community
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04485793 -
Effect of a Dietary Supplement on Lipid Pattern and Liver Parameters in Hypercholesterolemia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02341924 -
Validating the "Foods for Health" Portfolio of Functional Food Products
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02223793 -
Vascular Lifestyle-Intervention and Screening in Pharmacy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01941836 -
Evaluation of ETC-1002, Ezetimibe, and the Combination in Hypercholesterolemic Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01934608 -
The Effect of Synching Prescription Refills on Adherence
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01705873 -
Analysis on the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in HIV- Infected Subjects Treated With LPV/r Based HAART Regimen vs. an EFV Based Regimen
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01678521 -
Effect of LDL-apheresis on PTX3 Plasma Levels in Hypercholesterolemic Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01670734 -
Pharmacokinetic and Tolerability of Alirocumab SAR236553 (REGN727) in Patients With Hepatic Impairment and in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01370603 -
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin 10 mg/40 mg Combination Tablet Compared to Marketed Ezetimibe 10 mg and Atorvastatin 40 mg Tablets in Participants With High Cholesterol (MK-0653C-190 AM1)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01370590 -
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin 10 mg/20 mg Combination Tablet Compared to Marketed Ezetimibe 10 mg and Atorvastatin 20 mg Tablets in Participants With High Cholesterol (MK-0653C-185 AM1)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01446679 -
Special Drug Use-Results Survey of Lipitor Tablets
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01478789 -
Efficacy of Plant Sterol-Fortified Dairy Product on Plasma Lipid and Plant Sterol Concentrations in Humans
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01575171 -
Using Nudges to Implement Comparative Effectiveness
|
N/A |